Abstract

This study investigates the influence of inquiry-based laboratory activities on the understanding of heat concepts and the self-efficacy beliefs of pre-service primary teachers. Recognizing that both scientific literacy and teaching efficacy are critical for effective science education, this research aims to determine how inquiry-based laboratory tasks can enhance these attributes. The study involved 39 pre-service teachers participating in a sequence of eight three-hour courses. Assessments of conceptual understanding and self-efficacy beliefs were conducted before and after the intervention. The results indicate significant improvements in both areas, suggesting that hands-on, inquiry-based learning can effectively enhance scientific understanding and teaching confidence. These findings underscore the importance of integrating such methodologies into programs for teacher education to prepare future educators for fostering scientific literacy in their students.

Keywords

References

• Adadan, E., & Yavuzkaya, M. N. (2018). Examining the progression and consistency of thermal concepts: a cross-age study. International Journal of Science Education, 40(4), 371-396. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1423711
• Adam, G. C., Self, B. P., Widmann, J. M., Coburn, A., & Saoud, B. N. (2015, June). How misconceptions might be repaired through inquiry-based activities. In E. Board (Ed.), 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition (pp. 1-35). ASEE. https://doi.org/10.18260/p.24195
• Allen, M. J., & Yen, W. M. (2001). Introduction to measurement theory. Waveland Press.
• Andersen, A. M., Dragsted, S., Evans, R. H., & Sørensen, H. (2004). The relationship between changes in teachers' self-efficacy beliefs and the science teaching environment of Danish first-year elementary teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 15(1), 25-38. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JSTE.0000031461.68912.3d
• Appleton, K. (1995). Student teachers’ confidence to teach science: is more science knowledge necessary to improve self‐confidence? International Journal of Science Education, 17(3), 357-369. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069950170307
• Aydin, S., & Boz, Y. (2010). Pre-service elementary science teachers’ science teaching efficacy beliefs and their sources. Elementary Education Online, 9(2), 694-704.
• Azar, A. (2010). In-service and pre-service secondary science teachers' self-efficacy beliefs about science teaching. Educational Research and Reviews, 5(4), 175-188.
• Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
• Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In T. Urdan & F. Pajares (Eds.), Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (Vol. 5, pp. 307–337). Information Age Publishing.
• Bhattacharyya, S., Volk, T., & Lumpe, A. (2009). The influence of an extensive inquiry-based field experience on pre-service elementary student teachers’ science teaching beliefs. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 20, 199-218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-009-9129-8
• Bleicher, R. E. (2004). Revisiting the STEBI‐B: Measuring self‐efficacy in preservice elementary teachers. School Science and Mathematics, 104(8), 383-391. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594. 2004.tb18004.x
• Buck, L. B., Bretz, S. L., & Towns, M. H. (2008). Characterizing the level of inquiry in the undergraduate laboratory. Journal of college science teaching, 38, 52-58.
• Cakiroglu, J., Capa-Aydin, Y., & Hoy, A. W. (2012). Science teaching efficacy beliefs. In B. Fraser, K. Tobin, & C. McRobbie (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education (pp. 449-461). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9041-7_31
• Cantrell, P., Young, S., & Moore, A. (2003). Factors affecting science teaching efficacy of preservice elementary teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 14(3), 177-192. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025974417256
• Chiou, G. L., & Anderson, O. R. (2010). A study of undergraduate physics students' understanding of heat conduction based on mental model theory and an ontology–process analysis. Science Education, 94(5), 825-854. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20385
• Chu, H. E., Treagust, D. F., Yeo, S., & Zadnik, M. (2012). Evaluation of students’ understanding of thermal concepts in everyday contexts. International Journal of Science Education, 34(10), 1509-1534. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.657714
• Cone, T. P., Werner, P. H., & Cone, S. L. (2009). Interdisciplinary elementary physical education. Human kinetics.
• Deehan, J. (2017). A Review of the science teaching efficacy belief instrument B: pre-service teachers. In J. Deehan (Ed.), The science teaching efficacy belief instruments (STEBI A and B) (pp. 7-43). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42465-1_2
• Deehan, J., Danaia, L., & McKinnon, D. H. (2017). A longitudinal investigation of the science teaching efficacy beliefs and science experiences of a cohort of preservice elementary teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 39(18), 2548-2573. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693. 2017.1393706
• Demirel, M., & Caymaz, B. (2015). Prospective science and primary school teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs in scientific literacy. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191, 1903-1908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.500
• Dragoş, V., & Mih, V. (2015). Scientific literacy in school. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 209, 167-172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.273
• Eckhoff, A. (2017). Partners in inquiry: A collaborative life science investigation with preservice teachers and kindergarten students. Early Childhood Education Journal, 45, 219-227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-015-0769-3
• Enochs, L. G., & Riggs, I. M. (1990). Further development of an elementary science teaching efficacy belief instrument: A preservice elementary scale. School Science and Mathematics, 90(8), 694-706. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1990.tb12048.x
• Eshach, H. (2003). Inquiry-events as a tool for changing science teaching efficacy belief of kindergarten and elementary school teachers. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 12, 495-501. https://doi.org/10.1023/B: JOST.0000006309. 16842.c8
• Estrada, E., Ferrer, E., & Pardo, A. (2019). Statistics for evaluating pre-post change: Relation between change in the distribution center and change in the individual scores. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2696. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02696
• Evans, E. D., & Tribble, M. (1986). Perceived teaching problems, self-efficacy, and commitment to teaching among preservice teachers. The Journal of Educational Research, 80(2), 81-85. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1986.10885728
• Finney, S. J., & Schraw, G. (2003). Self-efficacy beliefs in college statistics courses. Contemporary educational psychology, 28(2), 161-186. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-476X(02)00015-2
• Flores, J. E. (2019, November). LNU pre-service secondary science teachers’ scientific literacy and science teaching self-efficacy. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1254(1), 012043. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 0739986303262605
• Gencer, A. S., & Cakiroglu, J. (2007). Turkish preservice science teachers’ efficacy beliefs regarding science teaching and their beliefs about classroom management. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(5), 664-675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2005.09.013
• Georgiou, H., & Sharma, M. D. (2012). University students’ understanding of thermal physics in everyday contexts. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10, 1119-1142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-011-9320-1
• Grandy, R. E., & Duschl, R. A. (2007). Reconsidering the character and role of inquiry in school science: analysis of a conference. Science & Education, 16(2), 141-166. https://doi.org//10.1007/s11191-005-2865-z
• Gray, K. (2017). Assessing gains in science teaching self-efficacy after completing an inquiry-based earth science course. Journal of Geoscience Education, 65(1), 60-71. https://doi.org/10.5408/14-022.1
• Guskey, T. R., & Passaro, P. D. (1994). Teacher efficacy: A study of construct dimensions. American Educational Research Journal, 31(3), 627-643. https://doi.org/10.2307/1163230
• Hasanah, D. S. (2021). The influence of inquiry-based learning model on self-efficacy and scientific literacy of high school students. Asian Journal of Science Education, 3(2), 113-119. https://doi.org/10.24815/ajse.v3i2.20308
• Hu, X., Jiang, Y., & Bi, H. (2022). Measuring science self-efficacy with a focus on the perceived competence dimension: using mixed methods to develop an instrument and explore changes through cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses in high school. International Journal of STEM Education, 9(1), 47. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-022-00363-x
• Kandil, S., & Işıksal Bostan, M. (2018, September). Prospective middle school mathematics teachers’ conceptions and affective dispositions toward mathematics [Paper presentation]. International Congress on Science and Education (ICSE2018), Afyon, Turkiye.
• Kesidou, S., & Duit, R. (1993). Students' conceptions of the second law of thermodynamics—an interpretive study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(1), 85-106. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660300107
• Kotsis, K. T. (2024). The significance of experiments in inquiry-based science teaching. European Journal of Education and Pedagogy, 5(2), 815. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejedu.2024.5.2.815
• Kotsis, K. Τ., Stylos, G., Houssou, P., & Kamaratos, M. (2023). Students' perceptions of the heat and temperature concepts: A comparative study between primary, secondary, and university levels. European Journal of Education and Pedagogy, 4(1), 136-144. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejedu.2023.4.1.577
• Latifah, S., Susilowati, N. E., Khoiriyah, K., & Rahayu, R. (2019, February). Self-efficacy: Its correlation to the scientific literacy of prospective physics teacher. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1155(1), 012015. https://doi.org/6596/1155/1/012015
• Manoli, C., Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L., De Jong, T., Van Riesen, S. A., Kamp, E. T., Manoli, C. C., Zacharia, Z. C. & Tsourlidaki, E. (2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning: definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educational Research Review, 14, 47-61.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.003
• Menon, D., & Sadler, T. D. (2017). Sources of science teaching self-efficacy for preservice elementary teachers in science content courses. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16(5), 835–855. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9813-7
• Mojavezi, A., & Tamiz, M. P. (2012). The impact of teacher self-efficacy on the students’ motivation and achievement. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(3), 483-491. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.2.3.483-491
• Muijs, D., & Reynolds, D. (2001, April). Being or doing: The role of teacher behaviors and beliefs in school and teacher effectiveness in mathematics, a SEM analysis. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 37, 3-15.
• Mulholland, J., & Wallace, J. (2001). Teacher induction and elementary science teaching: Enhancing self-efficacy. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(2), 243-261. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(00)00054-8
• Mulholland, J., Dorman, J. P., & Odgers, B. M. (2004). Assessment of science teaching efficacy of preservice teachers in an Australian university. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 15(4), 313-331. https://doi.org/10.1023/B: JSTE.0000048334.44537.86
• Narayan, R., & Lamp, D. (2010). " Me? Teach science?" Exploring EC-4 pre-service teachers' self-efficacy in an inquiry-based constructivist physics classroom. Educational Research and Reviews, 5(12), 748.
• Nottis, K. E., Prince, M. J., & Vigeant, M. A. (2017). Undergraduate engineering students’ understanding of heat, temperature, and energy: An examination by gender and major. US-China Education Review, 7(3), 125-143. https://doi.org/10.17265/2161-623X/2017.03.001
• Nussbaum, J., & Novick, S. (1982). Alternative frameworks, conceptual conflict and accommodation: Toward a principled teaching strategy. Instructional science, 183-200. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00414279
• Paik, S. H., Cho, B. K., & Go, Y. M. (2007). Korean 4‐to 11‐year‐old student conceptions of heat and temperature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(2), 284-302. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20174
• Palmer, D. H. (2006). Sources of self-efficacy in a science methods course for primary teacher education students. Research in Science Education, 36(4), 337-353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-005-9007-0
• Prince, M. J., Vigeant, M. A., & Nottis, K. (2009). A preliminary study on the effectiveness of inquiry-based activities for addressing misconceptions of undergraduate engineering students. Education for Chemical Engineers, 4(2), 29-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2009.07.002
• Prince, M., Vigeant, M., & Nottis, K. (2012). Development of the heat and energy concept inventory: Preliminary results on the prevalence and persistence of engineering students' misconceptions. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(3), 412-438. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb00056.x
• Razali, N., & Wah, Y. B. (2011). Power comparisons of Shapiro-Wilk, Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Lilliefors and Anderson-Darling tests. Journal of Statistical Modelling and Analytics, 2(1), 21–33.
• Riegle-Crumb, C., Morton, K., Moore, C., Chimonidou, A., Labake, C., & Kopp, S. (2015). Do inquiring minds have positive attitudes? The science education of preservice elementary teachers. Science Education, 99(5), 859–882. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21177
• Ritter, J. M., Boone, W. J., & Rubba, P. A. (2001). Development of an instrument to assess prospective elementary teacher self-efficacy beliefs about equitable science teaching and learning (SEBEST). Journal of Science Teacher Education, 12(3), 175-198. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016747713585
• Riyadi, T., Sunyono, S., & Efkar, T. (2018). Relation between the capability metacognition and self efficacy with chemical literacy student by using SiMaYang Model. Jurnal pendidikan dan pembelajaran kimia, 7(2), 251-263.
• Rubini, b., Ardianto, d., Pursitasari, i. d., & Permana, i. (2016). Identify scientific literacy from the science teachers’ perspective. Journal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 5(2), 299-303. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii. v5i2.7689
• Schoon, K. J., & Boone, W. J. (1998). Self‐efficacy and alternative conceptions of science of preservice elementary teachers. Science Education, 82(5), 553–568. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199810)
• Strat, T. T. S., Henriksen, E. K., & Jegstad, K. M. (2024). Inquiry-based science education in science teacher education: A systematic review. Studies in Science Education, 60(2), 191-249. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2023.2207148
• Stylos, G., & Kotsis, K.T. (2021a). Hands-on experiments to teach basic heat concepts. Primary Science, 167, 31-33.
• Stylos, G., & Kotsis, K.T. (2021b). Use of a simple home-made apparatus to teach basic thermal concepts – Six qualitative demonstrations/experiments. The Physics Teacher, 59(6), 477-479. https://doi.org/10.1119/10.0006134
• Stylos, G., Sargioti, A., Mavridis, D., & Kotsis, K. T. (2021). Validation of the thermal concept evaluation test for Greek university students’ misconceptions of thermal concepts. International Journal of Science Education, 43(2), 247–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1865587
• Stylos, G., Kamtsios, S., & Kotsis, K. T. (2022). Assessment of Greek Pre-service Primary Teachers’ Efficacy Beliefs in Physics Teaching. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 34(1), 44–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2021.2023959
• Stylos, G., & Kotsis, K. T. (2023). Undergraduate physics students' understanding of thermal phenomena in everyday life. Contemporary Mathematics and Science Education, 4(2), ep23023. https://doi.org/10.30935/conmaths/13406
• Stylos, G., Christonαsis, A., Georgopoulos, K., & Kotsis, K. T. (2023). The impact of an online physics lab on university students' self-efficacy and understanding of thermal concepts during COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Mathematics and Science Teacher, 3(2), em049. https://doi.org/10.29333/mathsciteacher/13701
• Thomaz, M. F., Malaquias, I. M., Valente, M. C., & Antunes, M. J. (1995). An attempt to overcome alternative conceptions related to heat and temperature. Physics Education, 3(1), 19-26. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/30/1/004
• Tournaki, N., & Podell, D. M. (2005). The impact of student characteristics and teacher efficacy on teachers’ predictions of student success. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(3), 299-314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2005.01.003
• Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and teacher education, 17(7), 783-805. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00036-1
• Tsoumanis, K.G., Stylos, G., & Kotsis, K. T. (2023). A comparative study between Greek pre-service teachers and primary school students’ scientific literacy levels. Science Education International, 34(2), 121-131. https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v34.i2.6
• Velthuis, C., Fisser, P., & Pieters, J. (2015). Collaborative curriculum design to increase science teaching self-efficacy: A case study. The Journal of Educational Research, 108(3), 217-225. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2013.878299
• Vosniadou, S. (2013). Conceptual change in learning and instruction: The framework theory approach. In In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 11-30). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-013-9640
• Walag, A. M. P., Fajardo, M. T. M., Bacarrisas, P. G., & Guimary, F. M. (2022). A canonical correlation analysis of filipino science teachers' scientific literacy and science teaching efficacy. International Journal of Instruction, 15(3), 249-266. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15314a
• Wiser, M., & Amin, T. (2001). “Is heat hot?” Inducing conceptual change by integrating everyday and scientific perspectives on thermal phenomena. Learning and Instruction, 11(4-5), 331-355. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(00)00036-0
• Yeo, S., & Zadnik, M. (2001). Introductory thermal concept evaluation: Assessing students' understanding. The Physics Teacher, 39(8), 496-504. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1424603

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.