Abstract

Science, technology, engineering, mathematics (STEM) education, the current engine for this technological generation, has made its way into Ghana's education system and is progressively becoming autonomous, particularly at the senior high level. It depends extensively on student mathematics performance to progress into their various dream STEM career programs. It is worthwhile to study the relationships between STEM students' mathematics (perception, self-efficacy, and connection) and mathematics achievement with their study interest mediating between them. The researchers purposively and conveniently sampled 385 general science respondents from eight selected senior high schools in the Kumasi metropolis for this study. The study produces results by quantifying and analyzing the collected data by investigating the six distinct hypotheses with structural equation model (SEM) using SPSS (26) and AMOS (24) software to confirm or refute fundamental assumptions. The study suggests that general science students' mathematics self-efficacy and connection directly impact their mathematics performance and, at the same time, somewhat mediate their ability to perform well in mathematics through their study interest. Moreover, there was no relationship between mathematical perception and student interest or achievement. Students must continue to evaluate the efficacy of their learning tactics to achieve academic excellence, and they must make reliable and self-efficacious evaluations of their mathematical learning as well as their mathematics connections to other STEM subjects to improve their study interest and mathematics achievement. The study recommends that stakeholders, curriculum developers, and implementers of the new STEM curriculum try to connect mathematics to all aspects of STEM as much as possible to either directly improve their performance or increase their interest in improving their mathematics education.

Keywords

References

• Adetunde, I. (2009). Improving the teaching and learning of mathematics in second circle institutions in Ghana: Paper II. New York Science Journal, 21(2), 9–11.
• Aguilar, M. S., Rosas, A., Zavaleta, J. G. M., & Romo-Vázquez, A. (2016). Exploring high-achieving students’ images of mathematicians. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14(3), 527–548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9586-1
• Aida, S. Md. Y., & Ali, W. Z. W. (2009). Motivation in the Learning of Mathematics. European Journal of Social Sciences, 7(4), 93–101.
• Appiah, J. B., Korkor, S., Arthur, Y. D., & Obeng, B. A. (2022). Mathematics achievement in high schools, the role of the teacher-student relationship, students’ self-efficacy, and students’ perception of mathematics. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 17(3), em0688. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/12056
• Arthur, Y., Asiedu-Addo, S., & Assuah, C. (2017). Students’ Perception and Its Impact on Ghanaian Students’ Interest in Mathematics: Multivariate Statistical Analytical Approach. Asian Research Journal of Mathematics, 4(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.9734/ARJOM/2017/33023
• Arthur, Y. D., Dogbe, C. S. K., & Asiedu-Addo, S. K. (2022). Enhancing Performance in Mathematics Through Motivation, Peer Assisted Learning, And Teaching Quality: The Mediating Role of Student Interest. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(2), em2072. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11509
• Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Prentice Hall.
• Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Prentice Hall.
• Bandura, A., Freeman, W. H., & Lightsey, R. (1999). Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.1891/0889-8391.13.2.158
• Bandura, A., & Locke, E. A. (2003). Negative self-efficacy and goal effects revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(1), 87–99. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.1.87
• Bernard, H. R. (2006). Research methods in anthropology: qualitative and quantitative approaches. Altamira Press.
• Blackmore, C., Vitali, J., Ainscough, L., Langfield, T., & Colthorpe, K. (2021). A review of self-regulated learning and self-efficacy: the key to tertiary transition in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM). International Journal of Higher Education, 10(3), 169–177. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v10n3p169
• Boateng, K. O. (2020, November 9). Ghana Wins 2020 International Robotics Championship with CSUC- GRAF Collaboration. CSUC. Retrieved June 25, 2023 from https://www.csuc.edu.gh/2020/11/09/ghana-wins-2020-international-robotics-championship-with-csuc-graf-collaboration/
• Brown, P. L., Concannon, J. P., Marx, D., Donaldson, C., & Black, A. (2016). An Examination of Middle School Students’ STEM Self-Efficacy, Interests and Perceptions. Journal of STEM Education Innovations and Research, 17(3), 1937.
• Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
• Callaman, A. R., & Estela, C. I. (2020). Students’ mathematics achievement in Mindanao context: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education, 5(2), 148–159. https://doi.org/10.23917/jramathedu.v5i2.10282
• Cangur, S., & Ercan, I. (2015). Comparison of model fit indices used in structural equation modeling under multivariate normality. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 14(1), Article 14. https://doi.org/10.22237/jmasm/1430453580
• Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of Goodness of Fit Indexes to Lack of Measurement Invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(3), 464–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834
• Denteh, M., Anamuah-Mensah, P. A., & Issaka, I. (2017). Examining the students’ and teachers’ perceptions about factors contributing to the decline in performance in mathematics in (SHS) in Manyakrobo District (Upper). International Journal of Advanced Education and Research, 2(1), 30–36.
• Ding, L., Velicer, W. F., & Harlow, L. L. (1995). Effects of estimation methods, number of indicators per factor, and improper solutions on structural equation modeling fit indices. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2(2), 119–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519509540000
• Dowker, A., Sarkar, A., & Looi, C. Y. (2016). Mathematics anxiety: what have we learned in 60 years? Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 508. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00508
• European Commission. (2015). Does the EU need more STEM graduates? Final Report. EC Publications Office.
• Ferrini-Mundy, J. (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics: A Guide for Mathematicians. Notices of the American Mathematical Society, 47(8), 868-876.
• Flowers, A. M., & Banda, R. (2016). Cultivating science identity through sources of self-efficacy. Journal for Multicultural Education, 10(3), 405–417. https://doi.org/10.1108/JME-01-2016-0014
• Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 382–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800313
• Gadanidis, G. (2012). Why can’t i be a mathematician? For the Learning of Mathematics, 32, 20–26.
• García-García, J., & Dolores-Flores, C. (2018). Intra-mathematical connections made by high school students in performing Calculus tasks. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 49(2), 227–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2017.1355994
• Hair, J. F., Black, W., Babin, B., & Anderson, R. (2009). Multivariate data analysis. Prentice Hall.
• Hair, J. F., Gabriel, M., & Patel, V. (2014). AMOS Covariance-based structural equation modeling (CB-SEM): Guidelines on its application as a marketing research tool. Brazilian Journal of Marketing, 13(2), 44-55. https://doi.org/10.5585/remark.v13i2.2718
• Hatcher, L., & Stepanski, E. J. (1994). A step-by-step approach to using the SAS system for univariate and multivariate statistics. SAS Institute.
• Henry, L. (2012). The Development of Working Memory in Children. Sage.
• Jurdak, M., Vithal, R., de Freitas, E., Gates, P., & Kollosche, D. (2016). Social and political dimensions of mathematics education. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29655-5
• Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39, 31–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291575
• Kanbolat, O., Bekdemir, M., & Bas, F. (2011). The examination of the attitudes of students enrolled from the 3rd to 8th year towards mathematics. The International Journal of Education Researchers, 3(8), 132–138.
• Kelley, T. R., & Knowles, J. G. (2016). A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), Article11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0046-z
• Kimberlin, C. L., & Winterstein, A. G. (2008). Validity and reliability of measurement instruments used in research. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, 65(23), 2276–2284. https://doi.org/10.2146/ajhp070364
• Lahey, B. B., McNealy, K., Knodt, A., Zald, D. H., Sporns, O., Manuck, S. B., Flory, J. D., Applegate, B., Rathouz, P. J., & Hariri, A. R. (2012). Using confirmatory factor analysis to measure contemporaneous activation of defined neuronal networks in functional magnetic resonance imaging. NeuroImage, 60(4), 1982–1991. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.02.002
• Lent, R. W., Lopez, F. G., & Bieschke, K. J. (1991). Mathematics self-efficacy: Sources and relation to science-based career choice. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38, 424–430. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.38.4.424
• Li, L., Peng, Z., Lu, L., Liao, H., & Li, H. (2020). Peer relationships, self-efficacy, academic motivation, and mathematics achievement in Zhuang adolescents: A moderated mediation model. Children and Youth Services Review, 118, 105358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105358
• Liu, X., & Koirala, H. (2009). The Effect of Mathematics Self-Efficacy on Mathematics Achievement of High School Students. NERA Conference Proceedings, 30, 1-13.
• Marsh, H. W., Hau, K.-T., & Wen, Z. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler’s (1999) Findings. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 11(3), 320–341. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1103_2
• McConnell, D. A., Stempien, J. A., Perkins, D., van der Hoeven Kraft, K. J., Vislova, T., Wirth, K. R., Budd, D. A., Bykerk-Kauffman, A., Gilbert, L. A., & Matheney, R. K. (2010). The little engine that could—Less prior knowledge but high self-efficacy is equivalent to greater prior knowledge and low self-efficacy. Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, 42(5), 191-196.
• Menanti, H., Sinaga, B., & Hasratuddin. (2018). Improve Mathematical Connections Skills with Realistic Mathematics Education Based Learning, 200, 29–35. https://doi.org/10.2991/aisteel-18.2018.7
• Middleton, J. A., & Spanias, P. A. (1999). Motivation for Achievement in Mathematics: Findings, Generalizations, and Criticisms of the Research. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30(1), 65–88. https://doi.org/10.2307/749630
• Olu, L. E. F., Adi, D., Caitoe, C., & Arthur, Y. D. (2021). Assessing the mediating role of perceived behavioural control and subjective norm in the relationship between perceived food quality and students’ attitude towards food waste. International Tourism and Hospitality Journal, 4(8), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.37227/ITHJ-2021-08-1108
• Oluwafunmilayo, O. D. (2013). Factors affecting students’ academic performance in mathematical sciences department in tertiary institutions in Nigeria. Us-China Education Review, 3(12), 905–913.
• Pantziara, M., & Philippou, G. N. (2015). Students’ motivation in the mathematics classroom: Revealing causes and consequences. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(2), 385–411. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-013-9502-0
• Pietsch, J., Walker, R., & Chapman, E. (2003). The relationship among self-concept, self-efficacy, and performance in mathematics during secondary school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 589–603. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.3.589
• Popa, R.-A., & Ciascai, L. (2017). Students’ attitude towards STEM education. Acta Didactica Napocensia, 10(4), 55–62.
• Reardon, S. F., Cheadle, J. E., & Robinson, J. P. (2009). The effect of Catholic schooling on math and reading development in kindergarten through fifth grade. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2(1), 45–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345740802539267
• Rogan, J. I., & Schmidt, H. G. (2017). Interest development: Arousing situational interest affects the growth trajectory of individual interest. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 49, 175–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2017.02.003
• Sari, E. P. & Karyati. (2020). CORE (Connecting, Organizing, Reflecting & Extending) learning model to improve the ability of mathematical connections. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1581, 012028. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1581/1/012028
• Schöber, C., Schütte, K., Köller, O., McElvany, N., & Gebauer, M. M. (2018). Reciprocal effects between self-efficacy and achievement in mathematics and reading. Learning and Individual Differences, 63, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2018.01.008
• Siegle, D., Rubenstein, L. D., & Mitchell, M. S. (2014). Honors students’ perceptions of their high school experiences: the influence of teachers on student motivation. Gifted Child Quarterly, 58(1), 35–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986213513496
• Skaalvik, E. M., Federici, R. A., & Klassen, R. M. (2015). Mathematics achievement and self-efficacy: Relations with motivation for mathematics. International Journal of Educational Research, 72, 129–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2015.06.008
• Stinson, D. W. (2004). Mathematics as “Gate-Keeper” (?): Three theoretical perspectives that aim toward empowering all children with a key to the gate. The Mathematics Educator, 14(1), 8–18.
• Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Post-examination analysis of objective tests. Medical Teacher, 33(6), 447–458. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2011.564682
• Trujillo, G., & Tanner, K. D. (2014). Considering the role of affect in learning: monitoring students’ self-efficacy, sense of belonging, and science identity. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 13(1), 6–15. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.13-12-0241
• Tucker, L. R. (1955). The objective definition of simple structure in linear factor analysis. Psychometrika, 20(3), 209–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289018
• Uakarn, C., Chaokromthong, K., & Sintao, N. (2021). Sample Size Estimation using Yamane and Cochran and Krejcie and Morgan and Green Formulas and Cohen Statistical Power Analysis by G*Power and Comparisons. International Journal, 10(2), 13-17.
• Usher, E. L., & Pajares, F. (2008). Sources of self-efficacy in school: Critical review of the literature and future directions. Review of Educational Research, 78(4), 751–796. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308321456
• Vukovic, R. K., Kieffer, M. J., Bailey, S. P., & Harari, R. R. (2013). Mathematics anxiety in young children: Concurrent and longitudinal associations with mathematical performance. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2012.09.001
• Wen, R., & Dube, A. K. (2022). A systematic review of secondary students’ attitudes towards mathematics and its relations with mathematics achievement| journal of numerical cognition. Journal for Numerical Cognition, 8(2), 295-325. https://doi.org/10.5964/jnc.7937
• Williams, C. (2007). Research methods. Journal of Business in Economics Research, 5(1), 65–72.
• Winheller, S., Hattie, J. A., & Brown, G. T. L. (2013). (PDF) Factors influencing early adolescents’ maths achievement: high quality teaching rather than relationships. Learning Environments Research, 16(1), 49–69. https://doi.org/10984-012-9106-6
• Wolf, E. J., Harrington, K. M., Clark, S. L., & Miller, M. W. (2013). Sample size requirements for structural equation models: an evaluation of power, bias, and solution propriety. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 73(6), 913–934. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164413495237
• Wong, S. L., & Wong, S. L. (2019). Relationship between interest and mathematics performance in a technology-enhanced learning context in Malaysia. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 14(1), 21-26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-019-0114-3
• Xiao, B., & Song, G. (2022). The impact of family socioeconomic status on learning conformity among chinese university students: Self-efficacy as mediating factor. Sustainability, 14(16), Article 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14169845
• Zhang, D., & Wang, C. (2020). The relationship between mathematics interest and mathematics achievement: Mediating roles of self-efficacy and mathematics anxiety. International Journal of Educational Research, 104, 101648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101648
• Zhang, Y., Liu, S., Yang, L., Feng, T., & Yang, X. (2022). Coparenting matters: The mediating effect of implicit theories of intelligence and depression on the relation between co-parental conflict and STEM self-efficacy among Chinese adolescents. Current Psychology, 41,6687–6699. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03118-7
• Zhou, D., Liu, J., & Liu, J. (2020). The effect of problematic Internet use on mathematics achievement: The mediating role of self-efficacy and the moderating role of teacher-student relationships. Children and Youth Services Review, 118, 105372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105372
• Zimmerman, B. J. (1995). Self-efficacy and educational development. In A. Bandura (Ed.), Self-efficacy in changing societies (pp. 202–231). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511527692.009

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.