Abstract

Self-regulated learning (SRL) and culturally responsive teaching (CRT) research, although from different viewpoints, both show instructional practices that enhance student engagement. This study examined the integration of self-regulated learning promoting practices (SRLPPs) and culturally responsive pedagogical practices (CRPPs) in the classroom context especially during a complex task. Using mixed-methods case study design, it explored how an elementary classroom teacher at a multicultural public school in the West Coast of Canada combined SRLPPs and CRPPs to support culturally diverse students’ engagement. Data were collected through:(a) classroom observations, (b) practice records and documents, (c) students’ work samples, (d) teacher interview, (e) student interviews, and (f) student surveys. Findings indicated that the teacher enacted integrated practices categorized as: (a) classroom foundational practices; (b) designed instructional practices; and (c) dynamic support practices. Also, students’ engagements related to their perceptions of teacher practices. Culturally diverse students were highly engaged in contexts with rich combinations of SRLPPs and CRPPs. Finally, this paper discussed the implications for theory (e.g., CRT, SRL), practice (e.g., an integrated pedagogy), and research (e.g., how to support culturally diverse learners’ engagement in contexts).

Keywords

References

• Aceves, T. C., & Orosco, M. J. (2014). Innovation configuration culturally responsive teaching. Ceedar Center, 2(IC), 1–37. http://ceedar.education.ufl.edu/tools/innovation-configurations
• Ainley, M. (2012). Students’ interest and engagement in classroom activities. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & W. Cathy (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 283–302). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_13
• Anyichie, A. C. (2018). Supporting all learners’ engagement in a multicultural classroom using a culturally responsive self-regulated learning framework [Doctoral dissertation, University of British Columbia]. https://open.library.ubc.ca/collections/ubctheses/24/items/1.0375773
• Anyichie, A. C., & Butler, D. L. (2015, May 30–June 3). Implications of supporting the development of self-regulated learning through modelling and scaffolding [Poster presentation]. 42nd Annual Conference of the Canadian Society for the Study, Ottawa, ON, Canada. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/336810681
• Anyichie, A. C., & Butler, D. L. (2017, April 27–May 1). A culturally responsive self-regulated learning framework [Paper presentation]. American Educational Research Association 98th Annual Meeting, San Antonio, TX, United States. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/324605557
• Anyichie, A. C., & Butler, D. L. (2018, April 13–17). Culturally responsive teaching and self-regulated learning: An integrated approach to supporting engagement in inquiry-based learning [Paper presentation]. American Educational Research Association 99th Annual Meeting, New York, NY, United States. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/324605557
• Anyichie, A. C., & Butler, D. L. (2019, June 1–5). Understanding culturally diverse learners’ motivation and engagement processes as situated in an inquiry-based learning context [Paper presentation]. 47th Annual Conference of the Canadian Society for the Study of Education, Vancouver, BC, Canada. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/336768995
• Anyichie, A. C., & Butler, D. L. (2023a). Examining culturally diverse learner’s motivation and engagement processes as situated in a context of a complex task. Frontier in Education, 8, 1041946. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1041946
• Anyichie, A. C., & Butler, D. L. (2023b). A pedagogical approach to fostering culturally diverse learners' engagement in self-regulated learning. British Journal of Teacher Education and Pedagogy 2(2), 1- 16. https://doi.org/10.32996/bjtep.2023.2.2.1
• Anyichie, A. C., Butler, D. L., & Nashon, S. M. (2018, May 26 - 30). Using culturally responsive teaching and self-regulated learning to support students in a multicultural classroom context [Paper presentation]. 46th Annual Conference of the of Canadian Society for the Study of Education, Regina, SK.
• https://www.researchgate.net/publication/348974807
• Anyichie, A. C., Butler, D. L., Perry, N. E., & Nashon, S. M. (2023). Examining classroom contexts in support of culturally diverse learners’ engagement: An integration of self-regulated learning and culturally responsive pedagogical practices. Frontline Learning Research, 11(1), 1–39. https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v11i1.1115
• Anyichie, A. C., & Onyedike, C. C. (2012). Effects of self-instructional learning strategy on secondary school students’ academic achievement in solving mathematical word problems in Nigeria. African Research Review: An International Multidisciplinary Journal, Ethiopia, 6(27), 302–323. https://doi.org/10.4314/afrrev.v6i4.21
• Anyichie, A. C., Yee, N., Perry, N. E., & Hutchinson, L. R. (2016, May 28–June 1). Supporting culturally diverse students with self-regulated learning [Paper Presentation]. 43rd Annual Conference of the Canadian Society for the Study of Education, Calgary, AB, Canada. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321807336
• Banks, J., Cochran-Smith, M., Moll, L., Richert, A., Zeichner, K., LePage, P., Darling-Hammond, L., Duffy, H., & McDonald, M. (2005). Teaching diverse learners. In L. Darling-Hammond & J. Bransford (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do (pp. 232–274). Jossey-Bass.
• Baroutsis, A., & Woods, A. (2018). Children resisting deficit: What can children tell us about literate lives? Global Studies of Childhood, 8(4), 325–338. https://doi.org/10.1177/2043610618814842
• Butler, D. L. (2011). Investigating self-regulated learning using in-depth case studies. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 346–360). Routledge.
• Butler, D. L., & Cartier, S. C. (2018). Advancing research and practice about self-regulated learning: The promise of in-depth case study methodologies. In D. H. Schunk & J. A. Greene (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (2^nd ed., pp. 352–369). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315697048-23
• Butler, D. L., & Schnellert, L. (2012). Collaborative inquiry in teacher professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(8), 1206–1220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2012.07.009
• Butler, D. L., Schnellert, L., & Cartier, S. C. (2013). Layers of self- and co-regulation: Teachers working collaboratively to support adolescents’ self-regulated learning through reading. Education Research International, 2013, Article 845694. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/845694
• Butler, D. L., Schnellert, L., & Perry, N. E. (2017). Developing self-regulating learners. Pearson.
• Cleary, T. J., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2012). A cyclical self-regulatory account of student engagement. In S. L. Christenson & A. L. Reschly (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 237–258). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_11
• Efklides, A. (2011). Interactions of metacognition with motivation and affect in self-regulated learning: The MASRL model. Educational Psychologist, 46(1), 6–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2011.538645
• Egbo, B. (2019). Teaching for diversity in Canadian schools (2nd ed.). Pearson.
• Fredricks, J. A., & Mccolskey, W. (2012). The measurement of student engagement: A comparative analysis of various methods and student-report instruments. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 763–782). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_37
• Fredricks, J., Blumenfeld, P., & Paris, A. (2004). School engagement: Potential of ehte concept, state of evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
• Fredricks, J. A., Parr, A. K., Amemiya, J. L., Wang, M.-T., & Brauer, S. (2019). What matters for urban adolescents’ engagement and disengagement in school: A mixed-methods study. Journal of Adolescent Research, 34(5), 491–527. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558419830638
• Gay, G. (2010). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research and practice. Teachers College Press.
• Gay, G. (2013). Teaching to and through cultural diversity. Curriculum Inquiry, 43(1), 48–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/curi.12002
• Gay, G. (2018). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice (3rd ed.). Teachers College Press.
• Ginsberg, M. B., & Wlodkowski, R. J. (2015). Motivation and culture. In J. M. Bennett (Ed.), The Sage encyclopedia of intercultural competence. Sage. https://philpapers.org/rec/BENTSE-2
• Gray, D. L., McElveen, T. L., Green, B. P., & Btyant, L. H. (2020). Engaging black and Latinx students through communal learning opportunities: A relevance intervention for middle schoolers in STEM elective classroom. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 60, Article 101833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101833
• Howard, T. C., & Rodriguez-Minkoff, A. C. (2017). Culturally relevant pedagogy 20 years later: Progress or pontificating? What have we learned, and where do we go? Teachers College Record, 119(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811711900104
• Hockings, C., Cooke, S., Yamashita, H., McGinty, S., & Bowl, M. (2008). Switched off? A study of disengagement among computing students at two universities. Research Papers in Education, 23(2), 191–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671520802048729
• Jang, H., Kim, E. J., & Reeve, J. (2016). Why students become more engaged or more disengaged during the semester: A self-determination theory dual-process model. Learning and Instruction, 43, 27–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.01.002
• Järvenoja, H., Järvelä, S., & Malmberg, J. (2015). Understanding regulated learning in situative and contextual frameworks. Educational Psychologist, 50(3), 204–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2015.1075400
• Jones, B. D., Krost, K., & Jones, M. W. (2021). Relationships between students' course perceptions, effort, and achievement in an online course. Computers and Education Open, 2, Article 100051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2021.100051
• Klem, A. M., & Connell, J. P. (2004). Relationship matter: Linking teacher support to student engagement and achievement. Journal of School Health, 74(7), 262–273. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1561.2004.tb08283.x
• Khalifa, Khalil, D., Marsh, T. E. J., & Halloran, C. (2019). Toward an indigenous, decolonizing school leadership: A literature review. Educational Administration Quarterly, 55(4), 571–614. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X18809348
• Kumar, R., Akane, Z., & Rhonda, B. (2018). Weaving cultural relevance and achievement motivation into inclusive classroom cultures. Educational Psychologist, 53(2), 78–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2018.1432361
• Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 465–491. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312032003465
• Ladson-Billings, G. (2021). I’m here for the hard re-set: Post pandemic pedagogy to preserve our culture. Equity & Excellence in Education, 54(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2020.1863883
• Larson, R., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2014). The experience sampling method. In M. Csikszentmihalyi (Ed.), Flow and the foundations of positive psychology (pp21–34). Springer.
• Lucas, T., Villegas, A. M., & Freedson-Gonzalez, M. (2008). Linguistically responsive teacher education: Preparing classroom teachers to teach English Language Learners. Journal of Teacher Education, 59(4), 361–373. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108322110
• McGregor, Latulippe, N., Whitlow, R., Gansworth, K. L., McGregor, L., & Allen, S. (2023). Towards meaningful research and engagement: Indigenous knowledge systems and Great Lakes governance. Journal of Great Lakes Research, 49, 22–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jglr.2023.02.009
• Mclnerney, D. M., & King, R. B. (2018). Culture and self-regulation in educational contexts. In D. H. Schunk & J. A. Greene (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 485–502). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315697048-31
• Merriam, Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. Jossey-Bass.
• Miles, M. B., Huberman, M. A., & Saldaña, J. (2013). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
• Montenegro, E., & Jankowski, N. A. (2017, January). Equity and assessment: Moving towards culturally responsive assessment (Occasional Paper No. 29). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois and Indiana University, National Institute for Learning Outcomes Assessment (NILOA). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED574461
• Mor, Y., & Mogilevsky, O. (2013). The learning design studio: Collaborative design inquiry as teachers’ professional development. Research in Learning Technology, 21, Article 22054. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v21i0.22054
• Nolen, S. B., Horn, I. S., & Ward, C. J. (2015). Situating motivation. Educational Psychologist, 50(3), 234–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2015.1075399
• Okoye, R., & Anyichie, A. C. (2008). Location and average class size as factors in achievement in JSC Mathematics examinations. Sokoto Educational Review, 10(2),175–185. https://doi.org/10.35386/ser.v10i2.403
• Orosco, M. J., & O’Connor, R. (2014). Culturally responsive instruction for English language learners with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 47(6), 515–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219413476553
• Paris, D. (2012). Culturally sustaining pedagogy: A needed change in stance, terminology, and practice. Educational Researcher, 41(3), 93–97. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X12441244
• Paris, D. (2021). Culturally sustaining pedagogies and our futures. The Educational Forum, 85(4), 364–376. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131725.2021.1957634
• Patall, E. A., Vasquez, A. C., Steingut, R. R., Trimble, S. S., & Pituch, K. A. (2016). Daily interest, engagement, and autonomy support in the high school science classroom. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 46, 180–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2016.06.002
• Pekrun, R., & Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (2012). Academic emotions and students engagement. In S. L. Christenson & A. L. Reschly (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 259–282). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_12
• Perry, N. E. (2013). Classroom processes that support self-regulation in young children. British Journal of Educational Psychology. Monograph series II: Psychological aspects of education-current trends (Vol.10, pp. 45–68).
• Perry, N. E., Hutchinson, L., & Thauberger, C. (2008). Talking about teaching self-regulated learning: Scaffolding student teachers’ development and use of practices that promote self-regulated learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 47(2), 97–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2007.11.010
• Perry, N.E., Lisaingo, S., Yee, N., Parent, N., Wan, X., & Muis, K. (2020) Collaborating with teachers to design and implement assessments for self-regulated learning in the context of authentic classroom writing tasks, Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 27(4), 416-443. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2020.1801576
• Perry, N. E, Phillips, L., & Hutchinson, L. (2006). Mentoring student teachers to support self-regulated learning. Elementary School Journal, 106(3), 237–254. https://doi.org/10.1086/501485
• Perry, N.E., Yee, N., Mazabel, S., Lisaingo, S., & Määttä, E. (2017). Using self-regulated learning as a framework for creating inclusive classrooms for ethnically and linguistically diverse learners in Canada. In N. J. Cabrera & B. Leyendecker (Eds.), Handbook on Positive Development of Minority Children and Youth (pp. 361–377). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43645-6_22
• Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of Self-Regulation (pp. 452–502). Academic Press.
• Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33–40. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33
• Rahman, F. A., Scaife, J., Yahya, N. A., & Jalil, H. A. (2010). Knowledge of diverse learners: Implications for the practice of teaching. International Journal of Instruction, 3(2), 83–96.
• Reeve, J. (2013). How students create motivationally supportive learning environments for themselves: The concept of agentic engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 579–595. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032690
• Schunk, D. H., Meece, J. R., & Pintrich, P. R. (2013). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications. (4th ed.). Springer.
• Sinatra, G. M., Heddy, B. C., & Lombardi, D. (2015). The challenges of defining and measuring student engagement in science. Educational Psychologist, 50(1), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.1002924
• Sleetter, C. E. (2012). Confronting the marginalization of culturally responsive pedagogy. Urban Education. 47 (3), 562- 584.
• Statistics Canada (2022). Statistics Canada, Census of Population, 2021. Increasing diversity of languages, other than English or French, spoken at home. Issue number: 2022051. Ottawa. Released August 17, 2022. https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/11-627-m/11-627-m2022051-eng.htm
• Strati, A. D., Schmidt, J. A., & Maier, K. S. (2017). Perceived challenge, teacher support, and teacher obstruction as predictors of student engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(1), 131–147. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000108
• Villegas, A. M., & Lucas, T. (2002). Preparing culturally responsive teachers: Rethinking the curriculum. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(1), 20–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487102053001003
• Wang, M., Willett, J. B., & Eccles, J. S. (2011). The assessment of school engagement: Examining dimensionality and measurement invariance by gender and race/ethnicity. Journal of School Psychology, 49(4), 465–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2011.04.001
• Weber-Pillwax. (2021). It's in the blood: theory and praxis of lifelong Indigenous education. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 40(4), 395–414. https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370.2021.1966528
• Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F. (1998). Studying as self-regulated engagement in learning. In D. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 277–304). Lawrence Erlbaum.
• Wolters, C. A., & Taylor, D. J. (2012). A self-regulated learning perspective on students engagement. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 635–651). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7
• Xie, K., Hensley, L. C., Law, V., & Sun, Z. (2019). Self-regulation as a function of perceived leadership and cohesion in small group online collaborative learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(1), 456–468. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12594
• Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research design and methods (5th ed.). Sage.
• Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: a social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of Self-Regulation (pp. 13–40). Academic Press.
• Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2
• Zusho, A., & Clayton, K. (2011). Culturalizing achievement goal theory and research. Educational Psychologist, 46(4), 239–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2011.614526

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.