Critical thinking, epistemological beliefs, and the science-pseudoscience distinction among teachers
Menşure Alkış Küçükaydın 1 * , Seher Esen 2, Hakan Çite 3, Sümeyra Geçer 3
More Detail
1 Necmettin Erbakan University, Eregli Faculty of Education, Konya, Türkiye
2 Selçuk University, Faculty of Education, Konya, Türkiye
3 Necmettin Erbakan University, Institute of Education Sciences, Konya, Türkiye
* Corresponding Author

Abstract

This study used the structural equation model to examine teachers' scientific epistemological beliefs, critical thinking skills, and beliefs about the distinction between science and pseudoscience. The study involved 730 teachers from 26 different subjects in different regions of Türkiye. Descriptive analyses showed a significant relationship between teachers' level of interest in scientific studies and their critical thinking skills. It was also concluded that critical thinking skills were high, but non-traditional understanding beliefs were low. Path analysis results showed that critical thinking skills were negatively related to traditional scientific beliefs. Furthermore, non-traditional understanding beliefs were found to be negatively correlated with pseudoscience beliefs. The results obtained were discussed in the light of the literature and suggestions were made considering the limitations.

Keywords

References

  • Adak, F., & Bakır, S. (2017). Science teachers and pre-service science teachers’ scientific epistemological beliefs and opinions on the nature of science. Çukurova University Faculty of Education Journal, 46(1), 134–164. https://doi.org/10.14812/cuefd.309443
  • Akın, A., Hamedoğlu, M. A., Arslan, S., Akın, Ü. Çelik, E., Kaya, Ç., & Arslan, N. (2015). The adaptation and validation of the Turkish version of the critical thinking disposition scale (CTDS). International Journal of Educational Researchers, 6(1), 31-35.
  • Alpaslan, M. M. (2017). The relationship between personal epistemology and self-regulation among Turkish elementary school students. The Journal of Educational Research, 110(4), 405–414. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2015.1108277
  • Alpaslan, M. M., Yalvac, B., Loving, C. C., & Willson, V. (2016). Exploring the relationship between high school students’ physics-related personal epistemologies and self-regulated learning in Turkey. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14(2), 297-317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-015-9685-7
  • Alkış Küçükaydın, M., & Gökbulut, Y. (2020).The impact of a research methods course on teacher candidates’ epistemological beliefs. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 45(3), 17–33.
  • Alkış Küçükaydın, M.(2020).Pedagogical formation students science-pseudoscience beliefs. Research on Education and Pschology, 4(2), 208–221.
  • Bahri, A., & Corebima A. D. (2015). The contribution of learning motivation and metacognitive skill on cognitive learning outcomes of students within different learning strategies. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 14, 487-500.
  • Banerjee, S., & Chua, A. Y. K. (2021). Calling out fake online reviews through robust epistemic belief. Information & Management, 58(3), 103445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2021.103445
  • Beyerstein, B. L. (1995). Distinguishing science from pseudoscience. The Centre for Curriculum and Professional Development.
  • Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. Wiley.
  • Boudry, M. (2021). Diagnosing pseudoscience - by getting rid of the demarcation problem. Journal for General Philosophy of Science, 35(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10838-021-09572-4
  • Buehl, M. M., & Alexander, P. A. (2006). Examining the dual nature of epistemological beliefs. International Journal of Educational Research, 45, 28-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2006.08.007
  • Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with EQS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed.). Routledge.
  • Chan, C. (2019). Using digital storytelling to facilitate critical thinking disposition in youth civic engagement: a randomized control trial. Children and Youth Services Review, 107, 104522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.104522
  • Chan, K. W., & Elliott, R. G. (2004). Relational analysis of personal epistemology and conceptions about teaching and learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(8), 817–831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2004.09.002
  • Chan, N.-M., Ho, I. T., & Ku, K. Y. L. (2011). Epistemic beliefs and critical thinking of Chinese students. Learning and Individual Differences, 21(1), 67-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2010.11.001
  • Chen, Q., Liu, D., Zhou, C., & Tang, S. (2020). Relationship between critical thinking disposition and research competence among clinical nurses: a cross-sectional study. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 29(7–8), 1332–1340. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15201
  • Cheng, M. H. M., & Wan, Z. H. (2017). Exploring the effects of classroom learning environment on critical thinking skills and disposition: A study of Hong Kong 12th graders in Liberal Studies. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 24,152-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.03.001
  • Chusni, M. M., Saputro, S., Suranto., & Rahardjo, S. B. (2022). Enhancing critical thinking skills of junior high school students through discovery-based multiple representations learning model. International Journal of Instruction, 15(1), 927-944. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15153a
  • Cofré, H., Núñez, P., Santibáñez, D., Pavez, J. M., Valencia, M., & Vergara, C. (2019). A critical review of students’ and teachers’ understandings of nature of science. Science & Education, 28(3-5), 205-248.
  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.) Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Comerford, A. S. (1999). The effects of a critical-thinking component in an English composition course on the epistemological beliefs of community-college students [Doctoral dissertation], University of San Francisco.
  • Conley, A. M. M., Pintrich, P. R., Vekiri, I., & Harrison, D. (2004). Changes in epistemological beliefs in elementary science students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29(2), 186–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2004.01.004
  • Cortinas-Rovira, S., Alonso-Marcos, F., Pont-Sorribes, C., & Escriba-Sales, E. (2015). Science journalists' perceptions and attitudes to pseudoscience in Spain. Public Understanding of Science, 24(4), 450-465. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662514558991
  • Dahl, T. I., Bals, M., & Turi, A. L. (2005). Are students' beliefs about knowledge and learning associated with their reported use of learning strategies? British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75(2), 257-273. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709905X25049
  • Deryakulu, D., & Hazır-Bıkmaz, F. (2003). The validity and reliability study of the scientific epistemological beliefs survey. Journal of Educational Sciences & Practices, 2(4), 243-257.
  • Duffy, M. C., Muis, K. R., Foy, M. J., Trevors, G., & Ranellucci, J. (2016). Exploring relations between teachers’ beliefs, instructional practices, and students’ beliefs in statistics. International Education Research, 4(1), 37-66.
  • Dyer, K. D., & Hall, R. E. (2019). Effect of critical thinking education on epistemically unwarranted beliefs in college students. Research in Higher Education, 60(3), 293-314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-018-9513-3
  • Ennis, R. H. (2009). Critical thinking assessment. Theory into Practice, 32, 179-186. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849309543594
  • Ennis, R. H. (2015). Critical thinking: a streamlined conception. In B. R. Davies M. (Ed.), The Palgrave handbook of critical thinking in higher education (pp.31-47). Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Eray Çelik, H. E., & Yılmaz, V. (2013). Structural equation modeling with LISREL 9.1: Basic concepts, applications, programming. (2nd ed.). Anı Publishing.
  • Escolà-Gascón, Á., Dagnall, N., & Gallifa, J. (2021). Critical thinking predicts reductions in Spanish physicians' stress levels and promotes fake news detection. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 42, 100934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100934
  • Facione, P. A., Sanchez, C. A., Facione, N. C., & Gainen, J. (1995). The disposition toward critical thinking. The Journal of General Education, 44(1), 1–25.
  • Facione, P., & Facione, N. (1992). CCTDI: a disposition inventory. The California Academic Press.
  • Facione, P.A. (1990). Critical thinking: a statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction (The Delphi Report). California Academic Press.
  • Field A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (3th ed.). SAGE.
  • Franco, A., & Vieira, R. (2019). Promoting critical thinking in higher education in the context of teacher professional development. 5th International Conference on Higher Education Advances (HEAD'19), 1313-1320). https://doi.org/10.4995/HEAd19.2019.9077
  • Fuertes-Prieto, M. A., Andres-Sanchez, S., Corrochano-Fernandez, D., Urones-Jambrina, C., Delgado-Martin, M. L., Herrero-Teijon, P., & Ruiz, C. (2020). Pre-service teachers' false beliefs in superstitions and pseudoscience in relation to science and technology. Science & Education, 29(5), 1235-1254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-020-00140-8
  • George, D., & Mallery, M. (2010). SPSS for Windows step by step: a simple guide and reference (10th Ed.). Pearson.
  • Getahun, D. A., Saroyan, A., & Aulls, M. W. (2016). Examining undergraduate students' conceptions of inquiry in terms of epistemic belief differences. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 46(2), 181-205.
  • Hansson, S. O. (2013). Defining pseudoscience and science. In M. Pigliucci & M. Boudry (Eds.), Philosophy of pseudoscience: Reconsidering the demarcation problem (pp. 61-77). University of Chicago Press.
  • Hıdıroğlu Özkan, Y., & Hıdıroğlu, Ç. N. (2016). Examining epistemological beliefs in explaining mathematics teachers’ approaches in mathematical modelling. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education, 12(1), 344–268.
  • Hofer, B. K. (2001). Personal epistemology research: Implications for learning and teaching. Educational Psychology Review, 13(4), 353-383.
  • Hofer, B. K., & Pintrich, P. R. (1997). The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of Educational Research, 67(1), 88-140. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543067001088
  • Hsu, F., Lin, I., Yeh, H., & Chen, N. (2022). Effect of Socratic reflection prompts via video-based learning system on elementary school students’ critical thinking skills. Computer & Education, 183, 104497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104497
  • Huerta, A., P., Muela, A., & Larrea, İ. (2022). Disposition toward critical thinking and creative confidence beliefs in higher education students: the mediating role of openness to diversity and challenge. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 43, 101003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101003
  • Hyytinen, H., Holma, K., Toom, A., Shavelson, R. J., & Lindblom-Ylänne, S. (2014). The complex relationship between students' critical thinking and epistemological beliefs in the context of problem solving. Frontline Learning Research, 2(5), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v2i4.124
  • Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (2007). Family, self, and human development across cultures, theory and applications (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Karaman, A. (2023). Teachers' conceptions about science and pseudoscience. Science & Education, 32, 499–528. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00312-0
  • Karasar, N. (2005). Scientific research method: Concepts, principles and techniques. Nobel Publishing.
  • Kelly, M. (2021). Epistemology, epistemic belief, personal epistemology, and epistemic: a review of concepts as they impact information behavior research. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 72(4), 507-519. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24422
  • Kirman-Çetinkaya, E., Laçin Şimşek, C., & Çalışkan, H. (2013). The adaptation study of science and pseudoscience distinction. Trakya University Journal of Education, 3, 31- 43.
  • Kohut, M. (2019). Changing minds or rhetoric? How students use their many natures of science to talk about evolution. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 14(4), 839-862. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-018-9865-1
  • Koyunlu Unlu, Z., & Dokme, I. (2017). Science teacher candidates’ epistemological beliefs and critical thinking disposition. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 17(72), 203-220.
  • Kuhn, D., Iordanou, K., Pease, M., & Wirkala, C. (2008). Beyond control of variables: What needs to develop to achieve skilled scientific thinking? Cognitive Development, 23(4), 435–451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2008.09.006
  • Liang, J. C., & Tsai, C. C. (2010). Relational analysis of college science‐major students’ epistemological beliefs toward science and conceptions of learning science. International Journal of Science Education, 32(17), 2273-2289. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690903397796
  • Losh, S. C., & Nzekwe, B. (2011). Creatures in the classroom: Preservice teacher beliefs about fantastic beasts, magic, extraterrestrials, evolution and creationism. Science & Education, 20(5-6), 473-489. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-010-9268-5
  • Maggioni, L., & Parkinson, M. M. (2008). The role of teacher epistemic cognition, epistemic beliefs, and calibration in instruction. Educational Psychology Review, 20(4), 445-461. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-008-9081-8
  • Metin, D., Cakiroglu, J., & Leblebicioglu, G. (2020). Perceptions of eighth graders concerning the aim, effectiveness, and scientific basis of pseudoscience: the case of crystal healing. Research in Science Education, 50(1), 175-202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9685-4
  • Moore, R. (1992). Debunking the paranormal: We should teach critical thinking as a necessity for living, not just as a tool for science. The American Biology Teacher, 54(1), 4–9. https://doi.org/10.2307/4449386
  • Oothoudt, B. (2008). Development of an instrument to measure understanding of the nature of science as a process of inquiry in comparison to pseudoscience. [Unpublished master dissertation]. California State University.
  • Özbay, H. E., & Köksal, M. S. (2021). Middle school students’ scientific epistemological beliefs, achievements in science and intellectual risk-taking. Science & Education, 30(5), 1233-1252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00217-y
  • Pallant, J. (2007). SPSS Survival manual: a step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS for Windows (3 th ed.). Open University Press.
  • Palmer, B., & Marra, R. (2008). Individual domain-specific epistemologies: Implications for educational practice. In M.S. Khine (Ed.) Knowing, knowledge and beliefs: Epistemological studies across drive culture (pp.325-350). Springer.
  • Palmquist, B. C., & Finley, F. N. (1997). Preservice teachers' views of the nature of science during a postbaccalaureate science teaching program. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 34(6), 595-615. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199708)34:6%3C595::AID-TEA4%3E3.0.CO;2-I
  • Pamuk, S., Sungur, S., & Oztekin, C. (2017). A multilevel analysis of students’ science achievements in relation to their self-regulation, epistemological beliefs, learning environment perceptions, and teachers’ personal characteristics. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15, 1423-1440. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-016-9761-7
  • Perry, W. G. (1970). Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
  • Perry, W. G. (1981). Cognitive and ethical growth: the making of meaning. In A. Chickering (Ed.), The modern American College (pp. 76–116). The modern American College, Jossey-Bass.
  • Pomeroy, D. (1993). Implications of teachers’ beliefs about the nature of science: Comparison of the beliefs of scientists, secondary science teachers, and elementary teachers. Science Education, 77(3), 261-278.
  • Ricco, R., Pierce, S. S., & Medinilla, C. (2010). Epistemic beliefs and achievement motivation in early adolescence. Journal of Early Adolescence, 30(2), 305–340. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431609333299
  • Saavedra, B., J., & Blumen, S. (2022). Critical thinking, creativity, self-efficacy, and teaching practice in Peruvian teacher trainers. Revista de Psicología, 40(1), 603-633. https://doi.org/10.18800/psico.202201.020
  • Saleh, S. E. (2019). Critical thinking as a 21st century skill: Conceptions, implementation, and challenges in the EFL classroom. European Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 4(1), 1–16.
  • Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 23-74.
  • Schmaltz, R., & Lilienfeld, S. O. (2014). Hauntings, homeopathy, and the Hopkinsville goblins: Using pseudoscience to teach scientific thinking. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00336
  • Schommer-Aikins, M. (1990). Effects of beliefs about the nature of knowledge on comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(3), 498-504.
  • Schommer-Aikins, M. (1994). An emerging conceptualization of epistemological beliefs and their role in learning. In P. Garner, R., & Alexander (Ed.), Beliefs about text and about text instruction (pp. 25–39). Erlbaum.
  • Schommer-Aikins, M. (2004). Explaining the epistemological belief system: Introducing the embedded systemic model and coordinated research approach. Educational Psychologist, 39(1), 19-29. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3901_3
  • Shermer, M. (2013). Science and pseudoscience-the difference in practice and the difference it makes. In M. Pigliucci & M. Boudry (Eds.), Philosophy of pseudoscience: Reconsidering the demarcation problem (pp. 203-224). University of Chicago Press.
  • Sinatra, G. M., Kienhues, D., & Hofer, B. K. (2014). Addressing challenges to public understanding of science: Epistemic cognition, motivated reasoning, and conceptual change. Educational Psychologist, 49(2), 123–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.916216
  • Şıvgın, C. (2019). Examining the relationship between high school students' epistemological beliefs, critical thinking skills and scientific process skills [Unpublished master dissertation]. Marmara University.
  • Solbes, J., Palomar, R., & Dominguez, M. C. (2018). To what extend do pseudoscience affect teachers? A look at the mindset of science teachers in training. Metode Science Studies Journal, 8, 188-195. https://doi.org/10.7203/metode.8.9943
  • Sosu, E. M. (2013). The development and psychometric validation of a critical thinking disposition scale. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 9, 107-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2012.09.002
  • Sutiani, A., Situmorang, M., & Silalahi, A. (2021). Implementation of an inquiry learning model with science literacy to improve student critical thinking skills. International Journal of Instruction, 14(2), 117-138. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.1428a
  • Turgut, H., Akcay, H., & Irez, S. (2010). The impact of the issue of demarcation on pre-service teachers' beliefs on the nature of science. Educational Sciences-Theory & Practice, 10(4), 2653-2663.
  • Tvrdy, F. (2021). Vice epistemology of believers in pseudoscience. Filozofia, 76(10), 735-751. https://doi.org/10.31577/filozofia.2021.76.10.1
  • Vieira, R. M. & Tenreiro-Vieira, C. (2016). Fostering scientific literacy and critical thinking in elementary science education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14, 659–680. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9605-2
  • Wilson, J. A. (2018). Reducing pseudoscientific and paranormal beliefs in university students through a course in science and critical thinking. Science & Education, 27(1), 183-210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-018-9956-0
  • Zubaidah, S., Corebima, A. D., & Mahanal, S. (2018). Revealing the relationship between reading interest and critical thinking skills through Remap GI and Remap Jigsaw. International Journal of Instruction, 11(2), 41-56. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.1124a

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.