Abstract

This study aims to explore trends and recent developments in socioscientific issues [SSI] within the context of sustainable science education. Using bibliometric analysis with the PRISMA methodology, the study evaluates 157 articles from the Scopus and ERIC databases published between 2014 and 2024. The findings show a significant increase in the integration of SSI in science education, particularly through interdisciplinary approaches and digital technologies for real-world problem solving. The study identifies key themes science education, scientific literacy, climate change, and sustainability have become key focuses in SSI research. With an average of 15.04 citations per document, this study indicates growing academic interest and influence in this field. The findings emphasize the need for relevant curricula, teacher training, and international collaboration to advance sustainable science education.

Keywords

References

• Abrori, F. M., Prodromou, T., Alagic, M., Livits, R., Kasti, H., Lavicza, Z., & Anđić, B. (2024). Integrating mathematics and science to explain socioscientific issues in educational comics for elementary school students. Journal of Graphic Novels and Comics, 15(4), 508–524. https://doi.org/10.1080/21504857.2023.2292734
• Agbo, F. J., Sanusi, I. T., Oyelere, S. S., & Suhonen, J. (2021). Application of virtual reality in computer science education: A systemic review based on bibliometric and content analysis methods. Education Sciences, 11(3), 142. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11030142
• Albe, V., & Pedretti, E. (2013). Introduction to the special issue on courting controversy: socioscientific issues and school science and technology. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 13(4), 303–312. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926156.2013.847219
• Alcaraz-Dominguez, S., & Barajas, M. (2021a). Conceiving socioscientific issues in Stem lessons from science education research and practice. Education Sciences, 11(5), 238. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11050238
• Alcaraz-Dominguez, S., & Barajas, M. (2021b). Conceptualization of socioscientific issues in educational practice from a review of research in science education. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 11(6), 297–302. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2021.11.6.1526
• Araiza-Alba, P., Keane, T., Chen, W. S., & Kaufman, J. (2021). Immersive virtual reality as a tool to learn problem-solving skills. Computers & Education, 164, 104121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104121
• Arici, F., Yildirim, P., Caliklar, Ş., & Yilmaz, R. M. (2019). Research trends in the use of augmented reality in science education: Content and bibliometric mapping analysis. Computers & Education, 142, 103647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103647
• Bader, J. D., Ahearn, K. A., Allen, B. A., Anand, D. M., Coppens, A. D., & Aikens, M. L. (2023). The decision is in the details: Justifying decisions about socioscientific issues. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 60(10), 2147–2179. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21854
• Ban, S., & Mahmud, S. N. D. (2023). Research and trends in socio-scientific issues education: a content analysis of journal publications from 2004 to 2022. Sustainability, 15(15), 11841. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151511841
• Ban, S., & Mahmud, S. N. D. (2024). A systematic review of the top-50 most-cited articles on socio-scientific issues in K-12 education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(4), em2425. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14379
• Bay, J. L., Vickers, M. H., Mora, H. A., Sloboda, D. M., & Morton, S. M. (2017). Adolescents as agents of healthful change through scientific literacy development: A school-university partnership program in New Zealand. International Journal of STEM Education, 4(1), Article 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-017-0077-0
• Baytelman, A., Iordanou, K., & Constantinou, C. P. (2020). Epistemic beliefs and prior knowledge as predictors of the construction of different types of arguments on socioscientific issues. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(8), 1199–1227. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21627
• Bencze, L., Pouliot, C., Pedretti, E., Simonneaux, L., Simonneaux, J., & Zeidler, D. (2020). SAQ, SSI and STSE education: defending and extending “science-in-context.” Cultural Studies of Science Education, 15(3), 825–851. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-019-09962-7
• Bossér, U. (2024). Transformation of School Science Practices to Promote Functional Scientific Literacy. Research in Science Education, 54(2), 265–281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-023-10138-1
• Bossér, U., & Lindahl, M. (2019). Students’ Positioning in the Classroom: a Study of Teacher-Student Interactions in a Socioscientific Issue Context. Research in Science Education, 49(2), 371–390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9627-1
• Büssing, A. G., Dupont, J., & Menzel, S. (2020). Topic Specificity and Antecedents for Preservice Biology Teachers’ Anticipated Enjoyment for Teaching About Socioscientific Issues: Investigating Universal Values and Psychological Distance. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1536. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01536
• Cabello, V. M., Zúñiga, C. G., Valbuena, C. A., Manrique, F., Albarrán, M. J., & Moncada-Arce, A. (2024). “We are not being taught sustainable citizenship!”: Podcasts for critical science literacy in teacher education. LUMAT, 12(2), 18–49. https://doi.org/10.31129/LUMAT.12.2.2135
• Calik, M., & Karatas, F. (2019). Does a “science, technology and social change” course improve scientific habits of mind and attitudes towards socioscientific issues? Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 44(6), 35–52. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2018v44n6.3
• Capkinoglu, E., Yilmaz, S., & Leblebicioglu, G. (2020). Quality of argumentation by seventh‐graders in local socioscientific issues. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(6), 827–855. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21609
• Cebesoy, U. B. (2021). Pre-service science teachers’ informal reasoning patterns and risk perceptions in ssi: case of gene therapy. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9(4), 211–229. https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/11237
• Chadwick, R., & McLoughlin, E. (2022). Irish secondary school science teachers’ perspectives on addressing the COVID-19 crisis as socioscientific issues. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 4(1), Article 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-022-00056-z
• Chen, L., & Xiao, S. (2021). Perceptions, challenges and coping strategies of science teachers in teaching socioscientific issues: A systematic review. Educational Research Review, 32, 100377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100377
• Chowdhury, T., Holbrook, J., & Rannikmäe, M. (2020). Socioscientific issues within science education and their role in promoting the desired citizenry. Science Education International, 31(2), 203–208. https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v31.i2.10
• Christenson, N., Gericke, N., & Rundgren, S.-N. C. (2017). Science and language teachers’ assessment of upper secondary students’ socioscientific argumentation. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(8), 1403–1422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-016-9746-6
• Dawson, V., & Carson, K. (2020). Introducing argumentation about climate change socioscientific issues in a disadvantaged school. Research in Science Education, 50(3), 863–883. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9715-x
• Dawson, V., & Venville, G. (2022). Testing a methodology for the development of socioscientific issues to enhance middle school students’ argumentation and reasoning. Research in Science & Technological Education, 40(4), 499–514. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2020.1830267
• de Freitas, A. C., do Nascimento, L. A., de Castro, R. G., Motokane, M. T., & Reis, P. (2023). Biodiversity and Citizenship in an Argumentative Socioscientific Process. Sustainability, 15(4), 2987. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15042987
• Eggert, S., Nitsch, A., Boone, W. J., Nückles, M., & Bögeholz, S. (2017). Supporting students’ learning and socioscientific reasoning about climate change—the effect of computer-based concept mapping scaffolds. Research in Science Education, 47(1), 137–159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-015-9493-7
• Fadzil, H. M. (2017). Exploring early childhood preservice teachers’ problem-solving skills through socioscientific inquiry approach. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 18(1), Article 9.
• Fages, V., & Albe, V. (2015). Social issues in nanoscience and nanotechnology master’s degrees: the socio-political stakes of curricular choices. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 10(2), 419–435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-014-9593-0
• Fayzullina, A. R., Zakirova, C. S., Dobrokhotov, D. A., Erkiada, G., Muratova, O. A., & Grishnova, E. E. (2023). Bibliometric review of articles related to context-based learning in science education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(9), em2330. https://doi.org/10.29333/EJMSTE/13534
• Forsythe, M. E., & Chan, Y.-W. (2021). Justice-centered education amid the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Environmental Education, 52(5), 347–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2021.1981208
• Gandolfi, H. E. (2024). (Re)considering nature of science education in the face of socio-scientific challenges and injustices. Science & Education. Advance Online Publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-024-00536-w
• Garrecht, C., Czinczel, B., Kretschmann, M., & Reiss, M. J. (2023). Should we be doing it, should we not be doing it, who could be harmed?: addressing ethical issues in science education. Science and Education, 32(6), 1761-1793. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-022-00342-2
• Genel, A., & Topçu, M. S. (2016). Turkish preservice science teachers’ socioscientific issues-based teaching practices in middle school science classrooms. Research in Science & Technological Education, 34(1), 105–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2015.1124847
• Grace, M., Lee, Y. C., Asshoff, R., & Wallin, A. (2015). Student Decision-Making about a Globally Familiar Socioscientific Issue: The value of sharing and comparing views with international counterparts. International Journal of Science Education, 37(11), 1855–1874. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1054000
• Grosseck, G., Tîru, L. G., & Bran, R. A. (2019). Education for sustainable development: Evolution and perspectives: A bibliometric review of research, 1992-2018. Sustainability, 11(21), 1992–2018. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11216136
• Herman, B. C. (2018). Students’ environmental NOS views, compassion, intent, and action: Impact of place‐based socioscientific issues instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(4), 600–638. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21433
• Herman, B. C., Clough, M. P., & Rao, A. (2022). Socioscientific issues thinking and action in the midst of science-in-the-making. Science & Education, 31(5), 1105–1139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00306-y
• Herman, B. C., Owens, D. C., Oertli, R. T., Zangori, L. A., & Newton, M. H. (2019). Exploring the complexity of students’ scientific explanations and associated nature of science views within a place-based socioscientific issue context. Science & Education, 28(3–5), 329–366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-019-00034-4
• Hodson, D. (2020). Going beyond sts education: building a curriculum for sociopolitical activism. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 20(4), 592–622. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-020-00114-6
• Hoeg, D., Lemelin, N., & Bencze, J. L. (2015). Sociopolitical development of private school children mobilising for disadvantaged others. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 10(4), 1155–1174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-014-9611-2
• Husamah, H., Suwono, H., Nur, H., & Dharmawan, A. (2022a). Action competencies for sustainability and its implications to environmental education for prospective science teachers: A systematic literature review. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(8), 12235. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12235
• Husamah, H., Suwono, H., Nur, H., & Dharmawan, A. (2022b). Sustainable development research in Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education: A systematic literature review. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(5), 11965. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11965
• Husamah, H., Suwono, H., Nur, H., Dharmawan, A., & Chang, C.-Y. (2023). The existence of environmental education in the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic literature review. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(11), 13668. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13668
• Ibragimov, G. I., Murkshtis, M., Zaitseva, N. A., Kosheleva, Y. P., Sadykova, A. R., & Shindryaeva, N. N. (2023). Research trends on learning environment in science education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(11), em2351. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13680
• Itzek-Greulich, H., & Vollmer, C. (2017). Emotional and motivational outcomes of lab work in the secondary intermediate track: The contribution of a science center outreach lab. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(1), 3–28. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21334
• Iversen, E., & Jónsdóttir, G. (2019). ‘We did see the lapwing’–practising environmental citizenship in upper-secondary science education. Environmental Education Research, 25(3), 411–421. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2018.1455075
• Jackson, W. M., Binding, M. K., Grindstaff, K., Hariani, M., & Koo, B. W. (2023). Addressing sustainability in the high school biology classroom through socioscientific Issues. Sustainability, 15(7), 5766. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15075766
• Jafari, M., & Meisert, A. (2021). Activating students’ argumentative resources on socioscientific issues by indirectly instructed reasoning and negotiation processes. Research in Science Education, 51(S2), 913–934. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-09869-x
• Johnson, J. A., Batkie, R., Macalalag, A., Dunphy, J., & Titus, S. (2023). Socioscientific issues and STEM learning. International Encyclopedia of Education, 2023, 143–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818630-5.13051-9
• Karahan, E. (2022). The lived experiences of pre-service science teachers designing and teaching socioscientific issues-based units. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 4(1), 24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-022-00064-z
• Karakaş, H. (2022). The Effect of Socioscientific Issues-Based Discussion Activities on the Attitudes of Primary School Teacher Candidates to the Life Science Teaching. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 19(1), 17–36. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2022.107
• Karakaya, E., & Irez, O. S. (2022). The relationship between understanding the nature of scientific knowledge and reasoning and decision making in socioscientific issues. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 37(4), 1329–1358. https://doi.org/10.16986/HUJE.2022.452
• Khishfe, R. (2014). A reconstructed vision of environmental science literacy: the case of Qatar. International Journal of Science Education, 36(18), 3067–3100. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.951980
• Kinskey, M., & Callahan, B. E. (2022). The influences of socioscientific issues on general science teaching self-efficacy. Research in Science Education, 52(5), 1451–1465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-021-09991-9
• Kinskey, M., & Newton, M. (2024). Teacher candidates’ views of future SSI instruction: a multiple case study. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 6(1), Article 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-024-00098-5
• Klaver, L. T., Walma van der Molen, J. H., Sins, P. H. M., & Guérin, L. J. F. (2023). Students’ engagement with Socioscientific issues: Use of sources of knowledge and attitudes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 60(5), 1125–1161. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21828
• Klopfer, L. E., & Aikenhead, G. S. (2022). Humanistic science education: The history of science and other relevant contexts. Science Education, 106(3), 490–504. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21700
• Klosterman, M. (2010). Multi-level assessment of scientific content knowledge gains associated with socioscientific issues-based instruction. International Journal of Science Education, 32(8), 1017–1043. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690902894512
• Kong, Z., Zhang, S., Zhu, F., & Zhang, J. (2022). The development and prospects of socioscientific issues teaching in the context of immersive media technology. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 877311. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.877311
• Lawson, H., & Lawson, M. (2020). Student engagement and disengagement as a collective action problem. Education Sciences, 10(8), 212. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10080212
• Le Thi Tuyet, T., Nguyen Thi, K., Tran Duc, H., Tran Thi Giao, X., Vo Thi, N., Huynh Kim Tuong, V., Do Thi Nhu, U., & Le Thi Mai, A. (2024). STEM education in primary schools of Southeast Asian countries: An analysis of scientific publications in the Scopus database from 2000 to 2022. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(4), em2433. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14432
• Lee, H. (2022). Pedagogical and epistemological challenges of pre-service science teachers teaching socioscientific issues. Asia-Pacific Science Education, 8(2), 301–330. https://doi.org/10.1163/23641177-bja10050
• Leicht, A., Heiss, J., & Byun, W. J. (2018). Issues and trends in education for sustainable development. UNESCO. https://doi.org/10.54675/YELO2332
• Lenhart, C., & Bouwma-Gearhart, J. (2022). Engaging students around the complex socioscientific issue of sustainability: affordances and tensions of faculty working across disciplines to develop transdisciplinary curricula. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 21(2), ar21. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.21-03-0075
• Lesnefsky, R. R., Kirk, E. A., Yeldell, J., Sadler, T. D., & Ke, L. (2023). Socioscientific modelling as an approach towards justice-centred science pedagogy. London Review of Education, 21(1), 30. https://doi.org/10.14324/LRE.21.1.30
• Lestari, N., & Suyanto, S. (2024). A systematic literature review about local wisdom and sustainability: Contribution and recommendation to science education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(2), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14152
• Leung, J. S. C. (2020). Promoting students’ use of epistemic understanding in the evaluation of socioscientific issues through a practice-based approach. Instructional Science, 48(5), 591–622. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-020-09522-5
• Leung, J. S. C. (2022a). A practice-based approach to learning nature of science through socioscientific issues. Research in Science Education, 52(1), 259–285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-020-09942-w
• Leung, J. S. C. (2022b). Shifting the teaching beliefs of preservice science teachers about socioscientific issues in a teacher education course. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 20(4), 659–682. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-021-10177-y
• Levy, B. L. M., Oliveira, A. W., & Harris, C. B. (2021). The potential of “civic science education”: Theory, research, practice, and uncertainties. Science Education, 105(6), 1053–1075. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21678
• Lombard, F., Schneider, D. K., Merminod, M., & Weiss, L. (2020). Balancing emotion and reason to develop critical thinking about popularized neurosciences. Science & Education, 29(5), 1139–1176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-020-00154-2
• Maia, P., Justi, R., & Santos, M. (2021). Aspects about science in the context of production and communication of knowledge of COVID-19. Science and Education, 30(5), 1075–1098. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00229-8
• Masalimova, A. R., Kabardov, M. K., Kosheleva, Y. P., Omarova, L. B., Zamaraeva, E. I., Dobrokhotov, D. A., & Fattakhova, S. F. (2024). Research on mentoring in science education: A bibliometric analysis. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(1), em2391. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14122
• Mystakidis, S., & Christopoulos, A. (2022). teacher perceptions on virtual reality escape rooms for stem education. Information, 13(3), 136. https://doi.org/10.3390/info13030136
• Namdar, B., & Namdar, A. O. (2022). Role reversal to facilitate social & moral compassion: a case for climate change as an ethics dilemma. American Biology Teacher, 84(4), 242–245. https://doi.org/10.1525/abt.2022.84.4.242
• Namdar, B., & Shen, J. (2018). Knowledge organization through multiple representations in a computer-supported collaborative learning environment. Interactive Learning Environments, 26(5), 638–653. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2017.1376337
• Navas Iannini, A. M. (2023). Socioscientific issues in science exhibitions: examining contributions of the informal science education sector. Journal of Science Communication, 22(02), 202. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.22020202
• Nida, S., Mustikasari, V. R., & Eilks, I. (2021). Indonesian Pre-Service Science Teachers’ Views on Socio-Scientific Issues-Based Science Learning. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9573
• Nielsen, J. A. (2020). Teachers and socioscientific issues – an overview of recent empirical research. In M. Evagorou, J. A. Nielsen, & J. Dillon (Eds.), Contemporary trends and issues in science education (Vol. 52, pp. 13–20). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40229-7_2
• Nielsen, J. A., Evagorou, M., & Dillon, J. (2020). New perspectives for addressing socioscientific issues in teacher education. In M. Evagorou, J. A. Nielsen, & J. Dillon (Eds.), Contemporary Trends and Issues in Science Education (Vol. 52, pp. 193–199). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40229-7_12
• Ottander, K., & Simon, S. (2021). Learning democratic participation? Meaning-making in discussion of socioscientific issues in science education. International Journal of Science Education, 43(12), 1895–1925. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.1946200
• Owens, D. C., Herman, B. C., Oertli, R. T., Lannin, A. A., & Sadler, T. D. (2019). Secondary Science and Mathematics Teachers’ Environmental Issues Engagement through Socioscientific Reasoning. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(6), 103561. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/103561
• Ozcan-Ermis, G., & Hervé, N. (2023). Identifying pre- and in-service teachers’ stances on teaching socioscientific issues: a systematic review of empirical studies. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 23(4), 741–764. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-023-00306-w
• Pham-Duc, B., Nguyen, H., Le Minh, C., Khanh, L. H., & Trung, T. (2020). A bibliometric and content analysis of articles in remote sensing from Vietnam indexed in Scopus for the 2000–2019 period. Serials Review, 46(4), 275–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/00987913.2020.1854155
• Powell, W. (2023). A socioscientific issues approach to ninth-graders’ understanding of COVID-19 on health, wealth, and educational attainments. PLOS ONE, 18(3), e0280509. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0280509
• Purwani, L. D., Sudargo, F., & Surakusumah, W. (2018). Analysis of student’s scientific literacy skills through socioscientific issue’s test on biodiversity topics. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1013(1), 012019. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1013/1/012019
• Rahayu, S., & Rosawati, E. E. (2023). The development of higher-order thinking skills (HOTS) assessment instrument in chemistry using socioscientific issues context: A preliminary trial. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2572, 030009. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0118624
• Ram, R. (2020). Engaging young people in science education through socioscientific issues of biosecurity. Kōtuitui: New Zealand Journal of Social Sciences Online, 15(1), 22–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/1177083X.2019.1637908
• Rasa, T. (2024). Futurising science education: Technology, agency and scientific literacy. Nordic Studies in Science Education, 20(1), 119. https://doi.org/10.5617/nordina.11429
• Rojas-Sánchez, M. A., Palos-Sánchez, P. R., & Folgado-Fernández, J. A. (2023). Systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis on virtual reality and education. Education and Information Technologies, 28(1), 155–192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11167-5
• Schenk, L., Hamza, K., Arvanitis, L., Lundegård, I., Wojcik, A., & Haglund, K. (2021). Socioscientific issues in science education: an opportunity to incorporate education about risk and risk analysis? Risk Analysis, 41(12), 2209–2219. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13737
• Solli, A. (2021). Appeals to science: recirculation of online claims in socioscientific reasoning. Research in Science Education, 51(S2), 983–1013. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-09878-w
• Stoeffler, K., Rosen, Y., Bolsinova, M., & von Davier, A. A. (2020). Gamified performance assessment of collaborative problem solving skills. Computers in Human Behavior, 104, 106036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.05.033
• Tidemand, S., & Nielsen, J. A. (2017). The role of socioscientific issues in biology teaching: from the perspective of teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 39(1), 44–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1264644
• Topçu, M. S., Foulk, J. A., Sadler, T. D., Pitiporntapin, S., & Atabey, N. (2018). The classroom observation protocol for socioscientific issue-based instruction: development and implementation of a new research tool. Research in Science & Technological Education, 36(3), 302–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2017.1399353
• Tosun, C. (2024). Analysis of the last 40 years of science education research via bibliometric methods. Science & Education, 33(2), 451–480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-022-00400-9
• UNESCO. (2017). Education for Sustainable Development Goals: learning objectives. UNESCO. https://doi.org/10.54675/CGBA9153
• Valdez, V. E., & Bianchini, J. A. (2023). “People need to speak up”: preservice secondary science teachers’ movement toward a justice-centered science education. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 34(5), 497–521. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2023.2193304
• van Lieshout, E., & Dawson, V. (2016). Knowledge of, and attitudes towards health-related biotechnology applications amongst Australian year 10 high school students. Journal of Biological Education, 50(3), 329–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2015.1117511
• Vesterinen, V.-M., Tolppanen, S., & Aksela, M. (2016). Toward citizenship science education: what students do to make the world a better place? International Journal of Science Education, 38(1), 30–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1125035
• Yacoubian, H. A., & Khishfe, R. (2018). Argumentation, critical thinking, nature of science and socioscientific issues: a dialogue between two researchers. International Journal of Science Education, 40(7), 796–807. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1449986
• Yapıcıoğlu, A. E. (2020). Covid 19 pandemic as a socioscientific issue in science education and suggestions for sample applications. Journal of National Education, 49(1), 1121–1141. https://doi.org/10.37669/milliegitim.787170
• Zeidler, D. L., Herman, B. C., & Sadler, T. D. (2019). New directions in socioscientific issues research. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 1(1), Article 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-019-0008-7
• Zhdanov, S. P., Akhmedova, M. G., Sokolova, N. L., Grishnova, E. E., Efimushkina, S. V, & Smirnova, L. M. (2023). Exploring preservice science teachers’ attitudes toward environmental technologies. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(1), 12825. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12825
• Zhu, Y., & He, A. (2022). The effects of a collaborative argumentation intervention on Chinese students’ socioscientific issues decision-making. The Journal of Educational Research, 115(6), 317–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2022.2150996
• Zidny, R., Solfarina, S., Aisyah, R. S. S., & Eilks, I. (2021). Exploring indigenous science to identify contents and contexts for science learning in order to promote education for sustainable development. Education Sciences, 11(3), 114. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11030114
• Zulfugarzade, T. E., Chirkina, S. E., Kondrashev, S. V, Chernega, T., Luzin, A., & Tararina, L. I. (2024). A comprehensive bibliographic analysis of environmental education research in Russia. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(4), 14425. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14425

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.