Abstract

Differentiated instruction is an important teaching approach that adapts educational experiences to fit the varied needs and learning styles of students in the classroom. This study examines the trend of research on differentiated instruction, using a bibliometric analysis to understand the current state of research in this area. The analysis was performed using online databases such as Scopus to locate relevant research articles from 1961 to 2023. The results of the analysis revealed that 746 articles were examined, focusing on factors such as publication year, language, journal, authors, and keywords. The findings indicate a gradual increase in research on differentiated instruction, with a significant rise in the number of articles published in recent years. The majority of the research articles were written in English and authored by scholars from universities in the USA and Europe. The keywords used most frequently in the articles included differentiated instruction, inclusive education and differentiation. This study provides a comprehensive view of the research trends in differentiated instruction, underscoring the need for further research to enhance our understanding of the approach's effectiveness and its impact on student learning outcomes. Recommendations for future research in the field of differentiated instruction include the need for research on themes and concepts that are less studied in the field, such as the application of differentiated learning in online learning, and the use of technology in differentiated instruction.

Keywords

References

• Abouzid, M., Główka, A. K., & Karaźniewicz-Łada, M. (2021). Trend research of vitamin D receptor: Bibliometric analysis. Health Informatics Journal, 27(4), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/14604582211043158
• Aldaej, A. (2016). Designing early literacy programs. Differentiated instruction in preschool & kindergarten. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 16(2), 282–285. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468798415622610
• Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
• *Boelens, R., Voet, M., & De Wever, B. (2018). The design of blended learning in response to student diversity in higher education: Instructors’ views and use of differentiated instruction in blended learning. Computers & Education, 120, 197-212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.02.009
• Brigandi, C. B., Gilson, C. M., & Miller, M. (2019). Professional development and differentiated instruction in an elementary school pullout program: A gifted education case study. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 42(4), 362-395. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353219874418
• Darrow, A.-A. (2015). Differentiated instruction for students with disabilities. General Music Today, 28(2), 29–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/1048371314554279
• *Davies, R. S., Dean, D. L., & Ball, N. (2013). Flipping the classroom and instructional technology integration in a college-level information systems spreadsheet course. Educational Technology Research and Development, 61, 563-580. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-013-9305-6
• *De Neve, D., Devos, G., & Tuytens, M. (2015). The importance of job resources and self-efficacy for beginning teachers' professional learning in differentiated instruction. Teaching and Teacher Education, 47, 30-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.12.003
• *Dixon, F. A., Yssel, N., McConnell, J. M., & Hardin, T. (2014). Differentiated instruction, professional development, and teacher efficacy. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 37(2), 111-127. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353214529042
• Goddard, Y. L., & Kim, M. (2018). Examining connections between teacher perceptions of collaboration, differentiated instruction, and teacher efficacy. Teachers College Record, 120(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811812000102
• Hernandez, A. M., Daoud, A., Woodcock, A., & Landin, K. (2021). Examining field experiences of teacher candidates during covid-19: Systemic inequities unveiled for underserved english learners in K-12 grades. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/15381927211057764
• Kalia, P., Mladenović, D., & Acevedo-Duque, Á. (2022). Decoding the trends and the emerging research directions of digital tourism in the last three decades: a bibliometric analysis. SAGE Open, 44(2), 190–202. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221128179
• Kholidah, H., Hijriah, H. Y., Mawardi, I., Huda, N., Herianingrum, S., & Alkausar, B. (2022). A bibliometric mapping of peer-to-peer lending research based on economic and business perspective. Heliyon, 20(22), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11512
• Kohnke, L. (2022). A pedagogical chatbot: A supplemental language learning tool. RELC Journal. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882211067054
• Lavrijsen, J., Dockx, J., Struyf, E., & Verschueren, K. (2021). Class composition, student achievement, and the role of the learning environment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 114(3), 498–512. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000709
• Li, P., Tong, X., Wang, T., Wang, X., Zhang, W., Qian, L., Liao, J., Diao, W., Zhou, J., & Wu, W. (2022). Biofilms in wound healing: A bibliometric and visualised study. International Wound Journal, 20(2), 313–327. https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13878
• Lin, P.-Y., Wu, W.-C., & Yang, J.-H. (2021). A QR code-based approach to differentiating the display of augmented reality content. Applied Sciences, 11, 11801. https://doi.org/10.3390/app112411801
• López-Duarte, C., Vidal-Suárez, M. M., & González-Díaz, B. (2020). Expatriate management and national culture: a bibliometric study of prolific, productive, and most cited authors and institutions. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 31(6), 805–833. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2017.1383287
• Man, D. W. K., Tsang, W. S. F., Lu, E. Y., & Tsang, H. W. H. (2019). Bibliometric study of research productivity in occupational therapy and physical therapy/physiotherapy in four Western countries and five Asian countries/regions. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 66(6), 690–699. https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1630.12608
• Markoulli, M. P., Lee, C. I. S. G., Byington, E., & Felps, W. A. (2017). Mapping human resource management: Reviewing the field and charting future directions. Human Resource Management Review, 27(3), 367–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.10.001
• Mukherjee, D., Lim, W. M., Kumar, S., & Donthu, N. (2022). Guidelines for advancing theory and practice through bibliometric research. Journal of Business Research, 148, 101–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.04.042
• Pham-Duc, B., Tran, T., Le, H. T. T., Nguyen, N. T., Cao, H. T., & Nguyen, T. T. (2021). Research on industry 4.0 and on key related technologies in Vietnam: A bibliometric analysis using Scopus. Learned Publishing, 34(3), 414–428. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1381
• Phoong, S. Y., Khek, S. L., & Phoong, S. W. (2022). The bibliometric analysis on finite mixture model. SAGE Open, 12(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221101039
• *Reis, S. M., McCoach, D. B., Little, C. A., Muller, L. M., & Kaniskan, R. B. (2011). The effects of differentiated instruction and enrichment pedagogy on reading achievement in five elementary schools. American Educational Research Journal, 48(2), 462-501. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831210382891
• Rejeb, A., Rejeb, K., Abdollahi, A., & Treiblmaier, H. (2022). The big picture on instagram research: Insights from a bibliometric analysis. Telematics and Informatics, 73, 101876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2022.101876
• Seetharam, A., Ali, M. T., Wang, C. Y., Schultz, K. E., Fischer, J. P., Lunsford, S., Whipple, E. C., Loder, R. T., & Kacena, M. A. (2018). Authorship trends in the journal of orthopaedic research: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Orthopaedic Research, 36(11), 3071–3080. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.24054
• Smets, W., & Struyven, K. (2020). A teachers’ professional development programme to implement differentiated instruction in secondary education: How far do teachers reach? Cogent Education, 7(1), 1742273. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2020.1742273
• Stollman, S., Meirink, J., Westenberg, M., & van Driel, J. (2021). Teachers’ interactive cognitions of differentiated instruction: An exploration in regular and talent development lessons. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 44(2), 201–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/01623532211001440
• *Suprayogi, M. N., Valcke, M., & Godwin, R. (2017). Teachers and their implementation of differentiated instruction in the classroom. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 291-301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.06.020
• Tomlinson, C. A. (2001). How to differentiate instruction in mixed-ability classrooms. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
• Tomlinson, C. A., & Imbeau, M. B. (2010). Leading and managing a differentiated classroom. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
• Tomlinson, C. A., & Mctighe, J. (2006). Integrating differentiated instruction and understanding by design. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
• Tomlinson, C. A., & Moon, T. R. (2013). Assessment and student success in a differentiated classroom. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
• Uysal, İ., & Doğan, N. (2021). Automated essay scoring effect on test equating errors in mixed-format test. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 8(2), 222–238. https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.815961
• *Valli, L., & Buese, D. (2007). The changing roles of teachers in an era of high-stakes accountability. American educational research journal, 44(3), 519-558. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831207306859
• *Vaughn, S., Moody, S. W., & Schumm, J. S. (1998). Broken promises: Reading instruction in the resource room. Exceptional Children, 64(2), 211-225. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440299806400205
• *Wertheim, C., & Leyser, Y. (2002). Efficacy beliefs, background variables, and differentiated instruction of Israeli prospective teachers. The Journal of Educational Research, 96(1), 54-63. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670209598791
• Wu, E. H. (2017). Paving the way for differentiated instruction in rural classrooms under common core state standards: An interview with carolyn callahan. Journal of Advanced Academics, 28(1), 51–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X16683646
• Yang, L., Liu, F., Liu, C., Yu, C., & Chang, Y. (2022). Bibliometric analysis of top-cited articles in Journal of Dental Sciences. Journal of Dental Sciences, 9(17), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2022.09.017
• Zhang, B., Rahmatullah, B., Wang, S. L., Zhang, G., Wang, H., & Ebrahim, N. A. (2021). A bibliometric of publication trends in medical image segmentation: Quantitative and qualitative analysis. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, 22(10), 45–65. https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13394
• *Zhu, Z. T., Yu, M. H., & Riezebos, P. (2016). A research framework of smart education. Smart learning environments, 3, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-016-0026-2
• Ziernwald, L., Hillmayr, D., & Holzberger, D. (2022). Promoting high-achieving students through differentiated instruction in mixed-ability classrooms: A systematic review. Journal of Advanced Academics, 33(4), 540–573. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X221112931
• Zólyomi, A. (2022). Exploring hungarian secondary school english teachers’ beliefs about differentiated instruction. Language Teaching Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688221114780

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.