Abstract

One characteristic of Physical Education [PE] is its body-relatedness.  A binary gender logic is pervasive in PE, shaping the perceptions, thoughts, and behaviours of both students and teachers. From a cis- and heteronormative perspective, this binarity goes along with inequality and discrimination. PE can be an especially sensitive context for trans* persons, whose gender and body identity differs from the sex assigned at birth. The body is seen as a medium, in which the consequences of a gender binary and heteronormative system is visible, represented and produced through performativity. Simultaneously, socially constructed bodies influence subjective experiences and practices. This interview study provides insight into trans* students’ perspectives regarding their embodied experiences and their construction of their (gendered) body in PE. Semi-structured interviews with five trans* women and seven trans* men were conducted. The interviews included topics related to their gender biography and their experiences in school, PE and extracurricular sports. The data analysis is based on Grounded Theory. The inseparable interplay of gender and body, which affects the trans* students’ gender identity, was highlighted in the perception and construction of PE and the body. The trans* body in PE is construed in a functional, symbolic and aesthetic dimension. These bodily experiences and constructions cannot be separated from incorporated gender and body norms which are actualised through performativity. The intersection of gender, body and identity paints a complex picture of trans* students’ bodily experiences in PE, where affirmation, but also self-doubt and degradation of one’s gender identity occur. Based on the results, pedagogical and didactic considerations for more trans* inclusive PE can be derived.

Keywords

References

• Armour, K. (1999). The case for a body-focus in education and physical education. Sport, Education and Society, 4(1), 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/1357332990040101
• Åsebø, E.-K. S., Løvoll, H. S., & Krumsvik, R. J. (2022). Students’ perceptions of visibility in physical education. European Physical Education Review, 28(1), 151–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X211025874
• Azzarito, L. (2009). The Panopticon of physical education: Pretty, active and ideally white. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 14(1), 19–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408980701712106
• Baumeister, R., & Leary, M. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497–529. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497
• Berg, P., & Kokkonen, M. (2022). Heteronormativity meets queering in physical education: The views of PE teachers and LGBTIQ+ students. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 27(2), 368–381. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2021.1891213
• Boskey, E. R. (2014). Understanding transgender identity development in childhood and adolescence. American Journal of Sexuality Education, 9(4), 445–463. https://doi.org/10.1080/15546128.2014.973131
• Burrows, L. (2000). Old games in new rompers? Gender issues in New Zealand physical education. Journal of Physical Education New Zealand, 33(2), 30–41.
• Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. Routledge.
• Butler, J. (1993). Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of "sex". Routledge.
• Caudwell, J. (2014). Transgender young men: Gendered subjectivities and the physically active body. Sport, Education and Society, 19(4), 398–414. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2012.672320
• Coffey, J. (2013). Bodies, body work and gender: Exploring a Deleuzian approach. Journal of Gender Studies, 22(1), 3-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2012.714076
• Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research. Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Sage.
• Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design. choosing among five approaches. Sage.
• Devís-Devís, J., Pereira-García, S., Fuentes-Miguel, J., López-Cañada, E., & Perez-Samaniego, V. (2018). Opening up to trans persons in physical education–sport tertiary education: Two case studies of recognition in queer pedagogy. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 23(6), 623–635. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2018.1485142
• Devís-Devís, J., Pereira-García, S., López-Cañada, E., Pérez-Samaniego, V., & Fuentes-Miguel, J. (2018). Looking back into trans persons’ experiences in heteronormative secondary physical education contexts. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 23(1), 103–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2017.1341477
• Drury, S., Stride, A., Firth, O., & Fitzgerald, H. (2022). The transformative potential of trans*-inclusive PE: the experiences of PE teachers. Sport, Education and Society, 28(9), 1118–1131. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2022.2034142
• Drury, S., Stride, A., Flintoff, A., & Williams, S. (2017). Lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender young people’s experiences of PE and the implications for youth sport participation and engagement. In J. Long, T. Fletcher & R. Watson (Eds.), Sport, leisure and social justice (pp. 84–97). Routledge.
• Fuentes-Miguel, J., Pérez-Samaniego, V., López-Cañada, E., Pereira-García, S., & Devís-Devís, J. (2023). From inclusion to queer-trans pedagogy in school and physical education: a narrative ethnography of trans generosity, Sport, Education and Society, 28(9), 1132–1145.https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2022.2073437
• Garrett, R. (2004). Negotiating a physical identity: Girls, bodies and physical education. Sport, Education and Society, 9(2), 223–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/1357332042000233958
• Glaser, B. & Strauss, A. (2006). The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Aldine Transaction.
• Hargie, O. D- W., Mitchell, D. H., & Somerville, I. J. A. (2017). ‘People have a knack of making you feel excluded if they catch on to your difference’: transgender experiences of exclusion in sport. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 52(2), 223–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/1012690215583283
• Herrick, S. S. C., & Duncan, L. R. (2022). A systematic scoping review of physical education experiences from the perspective of LGBTQ+ students. Sport, Education and Society, 28(9), 1099–1117. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2022.2071253
• Hortigüela-Alcala, D., Chiva-Bartoll, O., Hernando-Garijo, A., & Sánchez-Miguel, P. A. (2022). Everything is more difficult when you are different: analysis of the experiences of homosexual students in Physical Education. Sport, Education and Society, 28(9), 1068–1081. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2022.2074385
• James, J. (2021). Refusing abjection: transphobia and trans youth survivance. Feminist Theory, 22(1), 109–128. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700120974896
• Johnson, J. L., & Repta, R. (2012). Sex and gender: Beyond the binaries. In G. Oliffe (Ed.), Designing and conducting gender, sex & health research (pp. 17–38). Sage. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452230610.n2
• Kirk, D. (2002). Social construction of the body in physical education and sport. In A. Laker (Ed.), The sociology of sport and physical education: An introductory reader (pp. 79–90). Routledge.
• Landi, D. (2018). Toward a queer inclusive physical education. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 23(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2017.1341478
• Landi, D. (2019). LGBTQ Youth, Physical Education, and Sexuality Education: Affect, Curriculum and (New) Materialism [Doctoral dissertation, University of Auckland]. University of Auckland Research Repository. http://hdl.handle.net/2292/47621
• Landi, D., Flory, S. B., Safron, C., & Marttinen, R. (2020). LGBTQ research in physical education: A rising tide? Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 25(3), 259–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2020.1741534
• Larsson, H., Redelius, K., & Fagrell, B. (2011). Moving (in) the heterosexual matrix. On heteronormativity in secondary school physical education. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 16(1), 67–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2010.491819
• López-Cañada, E., Devís-Devís, J., Pereira-García, S., & Pérez-Samaniego, V. (2021). Socio-ecological analysis of trans people’s participation in physical activity and sport. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 56(1), 62–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/1012690219887174
• Marchia, J., & Sommer, J. (2019). (Re)defining heteronormativity. Sexualities, 22(3), 267–295. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460717741801
• Martino, W., Kassen, J., & Omercajic, K. (2022). Supporting transgender students in schools: beyond an individualist approach to trans inclusion in the education system. Educational Review, 74(4), 753–772. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2020.1829559
• Miller, S. (2016). Trans*⁺ing classrooms: The pedagogy of refusal as mediator for learning. Social Sciences, 5(34), 1–17.
• Möhwald, A. (2024). Aus den Erfahrungen von trans* Schüler*innen lernen – Anregungen für trans*inklusiven Sportunterricht [Learning from the experiences of trans* pupils - suggestions for trans*inclusive PE lessons]. Sportunterricht, 73(4), 154-159.
• Müller, J., & Böhlke, N. (2021). Physical education from LGBTQ+ students’ perspective. A systematic review of qualitative studies. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 28(6), 601–616. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2021.2014434
• Neary, A., & McBride, R.-S. (2021). Beyond inclusion: trans and gender diverse young people’s experiences of PE and school sport. Sport, Education and Society, 29(5), 593–606. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2021.2017272
• Pérez-Samaniego, V., Fuentes-Miguel, J., Pereira-García, S., & Devís-Devís, J. (2016). Abjection and alterity in the imagining of transgender in physical education and sport: A pedagogical approach in higher education. Sport, Education and Society, 21(7), 985–1002. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2014.981253
• Phipps, C., & Blackall, C. J. (2021). ‘I wasn’t allowed to join the boys’: The ideology of cultural cisgenderism in a UK school. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 31(5), 1097–1114. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2021.2000012
• Preece, S., & Bullingham, R. (2022). Gender stereotypes: the impact upon perceived roles and practice of in-service teachers in physical education. Sport, Education and Society, 27(39), 259–271. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2020.1848813
• Risman, B. J. (2018). Gender as a social structure. In B. J. Risman, C. M. Froyum & W. J. Scarborough (Eds.), Handbook of the sociology of gender (pp. 19–44). Springer.
• Safron, C., & Landi, D. (2022). Beyond the BEEPs: affect, FitnessGram®, and diverse youth. Sport, Education and Society, 27(9), 1020–1034. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2021.1953978
• Shelton, J., & Dodd, S.J. (2020) Teaching note – beyond the binary: addressing cisnormativity in the social work classroom. Journal of Social Work Education, 56(1), 179–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2019.1648222
• Shilling, C. (1993). The body and social theory. Sage.
• Shilling, C. (2010). Exploring the society-body-school nexus: theoretical and methodology issue in the study of body pedagogies. Sport, Education and Society, 15(2), 151–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573321003683786
• Sykes, H. (2011) Queer bodies: sexualities, genders & fatness in physical education. Peter Lang.
• Walsh, R., & Einstein, G. (2020). Transgender embodiment: a feminist, situated neuroscience perspective, INSEP – Journal of the International Network for Sexual Ethics & Politics, 8, 56–70. https://doi.org/10.3224/insep.si2020.04
• Warner, M. (1991). Introduction: Fear of a queer planet. Social Text, 29, 3–17.
• Williamson, R., & Sandford, R. (2018). "School is already difficult enough...": Examining transgender issues in physical education. Physical Education Matters, 13(3), 57–61.
• Wright, J. (1996). The construction of complementarity in physical education. Gender and Education, 8(1), 61–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/713668480

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.