Abstract

This mixed-method study examines problems, practices, and suggestions associated with writing education in Turkish language courses. The study involved 96 Turkish teachers working in secondary schools. Using the responses from teachers, the results of the survey were presented on the basis of dimensions such as teachers' competencies in teaching writing, students' habits and competencies in writing, and teacher education programs' adequacy. Additionally, the study examined the additional support teachers provide to students with writing difficulties and the evidence-based practices they employ. This study found Turkish teachers participating in the study to have poor writing practices. The teaching of writing was problematic on several levels, including teacher training and student and teacher competence. Furthermore, teachers reported that secondary school writing instruction was unrelated to teacher training. It was also reported that students often lacked writing habits and had below-average writing skills. Despite the importance of evidence-based practices in effective writing instruction, teachers were deficient in providing additional support to students with writing difficulties. Last but not least, teachers' self-efficacy in evidence-based writing was not influenced by gender, educational background, school location, age, or years of teaching experience. The results point to the necessity of continuous improvement in writing education.

Keywords

References

• Applebee, A. N., & Langer, J. A. (2011). A snapshot of writing instruction in middle schools and high schools. English Journal, 100(6), 14–27.
• Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority. (2022). Literacy and numeracy: Achievement in reading, writing and numeracy: National report for 2022. NAPLAN.
• Aydın, E. (2022). Problems encountered by Turkish teachers in writing education practices and solutions suggestions. Journal of Social Sciences of Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University, 19(1), 12–26. https://doi.org/10.33437/ksusbd.947657
• Ball, A. F., & Ellis, P. (2008). Identity and the writing of culturally and linguistically diverse students. In C. Bazerman (Ed.), Handbook of research on writing: History, society, school, individual, text (pp. 614–6319). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Bañales, G., Ahumada, S., Graham, S., Puente, A., Guajardo, M., & Muñoz, I. (2020). Teaching writing in grades 4–6 in urban schools in Chile: A national survey. Reading and Writing, 33, 2661–2696. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-020-10055-z
• Baştuğ, M., & Demirgüneş, S. (2016). Türkçe öğretiminde ders işleme süreci [Coursework process in Turkish teaching]. In F. S. Kırmızı (Ed.), İlk ve ortaokullarda Türkçe öğretimi: 2015 programına uygun [Teaching Turkish in primary and secondary schools: In line with the 2015 curriculum] (pp. 17–60). Anı.
• Bilgin, S. (2018). The situations of application of writing methods and techniques of Turkish teachers in Turkish education program (6th-8th grades) [Unpublished master's thesis]. Mersin University, Mersin.
• Bouwer, R., van Ockenburg, L., van der Loo, J., & van Weijen, D. (2022). Literatuurstudie naar de kenmerken van effectief schrijfonderwijs in het voortgezet onderwijs [Literature study into the characteristics of effective writing education in secondary education]. Universiteit Utrecht.
• Brindle, M., Graham, S., Harris, K. R., & Hebert, M. (2016). Third and fourth-grade teacher’s classroom practices in writing: A national survey. Reading and Writing, 29, 929–954. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9604-x
• Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. The Guilford Press.
• Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Sage.
• Bryman, A., & Cramer, D. (2004). Quantitative data analysis with SPSS 12 and 13: A guide for social scientists. Routledge.
• Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2014). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı [Manual of data analysis for social sciences]. Pegem.
• Cheung, Y. L., & Jang, H. (2019). Teaching writing to elementary school students: An activity theory perspective. Irish Educational Studies, 38(4), 451–466. https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2019.1645720
• Coelho, R. (2020). Teaching writing in Brazilian public high schools. Reading and Writing, 33, 1477-1529. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-019-10008-1
• Creswell, J. W. (2021). Karma yöntem araştırmalarına giriş [A concise introduction to mixed methods research] (M. Sözbilir, Trans.). Pegem. https://doi.org/10.14527/9786053184720
• Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2015). Karma yöntem araştırmaları: Tasarımı ve yürütülmesi [Designing and conducting mixed methods research] (Y. Dede & S. B. Demir, Trans.). Anı.
• Cutler, L., & Graham, S. (2008). Primary grade writing instruction: A national survey. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(4), 907–919. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012656
• Çalışkan, G., & Sur, E. (2022). Evaluation of Turkish teachers' views on speaking and writing activities in the classroom. Journal of Mother Tongue Education, 10(2), 401–417. https://doi.org/10.16916/aded.1061889
• Çelikdemir, K. (2019). Uygun adayların mesleğe seçilmesi ve etkili bir hazırlık sürecine tabi tutulması [Selecting suitable candidates for the profession and subjecting them to an effective preparation process]. In E. Karip (Ed.), TALIS 2018 sonuçları ve Türkiye üzerine değerlendirmeler [TALIS 2018 results and evaluations on Türkiye] (pp. 35–44). TEDMEM.
• Damar, G. (2016). Evaluation of the assessment and evaluation methods of the secondary school Turkish language teachers in writing lessons [Unpublished master's thesis]. Erciyes University, Kayseri.
• Demirci-Celep, N. (2019). Öğretme ve öğrenme [Teaching and learning]. In E. Karip (Ed.), TALIS 2018 sonuçları ve Türkiye üzerine değerlendirmeler [TALIS 2018 results and evaluations on Türkiye] (pp. 11–21). TEDMEM.
• De Smedt, F., Van Keer, H., & Merchie, E. (2016). Student, teacher and class-level correlates of Flemish late elementary school children's writing performance. Reading and Writing, 29(5), 833-868. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9590-z
• De Smedt, F., & Van Keer, H. (2017). Writing and writing instruction in Flemish primary schools: Unraveling the black box. Pedagogische Studiën, 94(4), 254–282.
• Dockrell, J. E., Marshall, C. R., & Wyse, D. (2016). Teachers' reported practices for teaching writing in England. Reading and Writing, 29(3), 409–434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9605-9
• Esendemir, N. (2019). Awareness and opinions of Turkish language teachers on writing strategies [Unpublished master's thesis]. Hacettepe University, Ankara.
• Eurydice. (2013). Key data on teachers and school leaders in Europe: 2013 edition. European Commission Publications Office. https://doi.org/10.2797/91785
• Eurydice, (2019). Digital education at school in Europe. European Commission Publications Office. https://doi.org/10.2797/763
• Fidalgo, R., Harris, K. R., & Braaksma, M. (2017). Design principles for teaching effective writing: An introduction. In R. Fidalgo & T. Olive (Series Eds.) & R. Fidalgo, K. R. Harris, & M. Braaksma (Vol. Eds.), Studies in Writing Series, 34. Design principles for teaching effective writing (pp. 3–12). Brill.
• Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS. Sage.
• Fisher, H. M. (2017). Using activity theory to understand effective writing instruction with high-poverty middle school students [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Montana State University, Bozeman.
• Gadd, M., & Parr, J. M. (2017). Practices of effective writing teachers. Reading and Writing, 30(7), 1551–1574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-017-9737-1
• George, D., & Mallery, M. (2010). SPSS for windows step by step: A simple guide and reference, 17.0 update (10th ed.). Pearson.
• Gilbert, J., & Graham, S. (2010). Teaching writing to elementary students in grades 4–6: A national survey. The Elementary School Journal, 110(4), 494–518. https://doi.org/10.1086/651193
• Graham, S., Capizzi, A., Harris, K. R., Hebert, M., & Morphy, P. (2014). Teaching writing to middle school students: A national survey. Reading and Writing, 27(6), 1015–1042. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-013-9495-7
• Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (2017). Evidence-based writing practices: A meta-analysis of existing meta-analyses. In R. Fidalgo & T. Olive (Series Eds.) & R. Fidalgo, K. R. Harris, & M. Braaksma (Vol. Eds.), Studies in Writing Series, 34. Design principles for teaching effective writing (pp. 13–37). Brill.
• Graham, S., Harris, K. R., & Santangelo, T. (2015). Research-based writing practices and the common core: Meta-analysis and meta-synthesis. The Elementary School Journal, 115(4), 498 522. https://doi.org/10.1086/681964
• Graham, S., McKeown, D., Kiuhara, S., & Harris, K. R. (2012). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for students in the elementary grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(4), 879–896. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029185
• Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for adolescent students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(3), 445–476. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.445
• Graham, S., Skar, G. B., & Falk, D. Y. (2021). Teaching writing in the primary grades in Norway: A national survey. Reading and Writing, 34(2), 529–563. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-020 10080-y
• Gündüz, O., & Şimşek, T. (2011). Anlatma teknikleri 2: Uygulamalı yazma eğitimi el kitabı [Lecture techniques 2: Practical writing training handbook]. Grafiker Pub.
• Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2013). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson.
• Hamzadayı, E. (2019). Yazmaya ilişkin yanılgılar ve yaygın hatalar [Misconceptions and common mistakes about typing.]. In N. Bayat (Ed.), Yazma ve eğitimi [Writing and writing education] (pp. 223–248). Anı.
• Harris, K. R., & McKeown, D. (2022). Overcoming barriers and paradigm wars: Powerful evidence based writing instruction. Theory Into Practice, 61(4), 429–442, https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2022.2107334
• Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
• Henkens, L. S. J. M. (2010). Het onderwijs in het schrijven van teksten [Education in text writing]. Inspectorate of Education.
• Hertzberg, F., & Roe, A. (2016). Writing in the content areas: A Norwegian case study. Reading and Writing, 29(3), 555–576. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9607-7
• Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. R. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53–60.
• Hsiang, T. P., & Graham, S. (2016). Teaching writing in grades 4–6 in urban schools in the Greater China Region. Reading and Writing, 29(5), 869–902. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9597 5
• Hyland, K. (2010). Teaching and researching writing. Pearson.
• Inspectie van Het Onderwijs. (2021). Peil schrijfvaardigheid einde (speciaal) basisonderwijs 2018 2019 [Level of writing skills at the end of (special) primary education 2018 2019]. Author.
• Karadüz, A. (2014). Türkçe dersinin işlenişinde genel ağda (internet) çoklu ve iş birlikli öğrenme ortamları: Wiki blog ve podcasting programları [Multiple and collaborative learning environments on the internet in the teaching of Turkish language: Wiki blog and podcasting programs.]. In A. Baytak (Ed.), Eğitimde web teknolojilerinin kullanımı [Use of web technologies in education] (s. 43–70). Pegem.
• Karatay, H. & Dilekçi, A. (2019). Competencies of Turkish teachers in measuring and evaluating language skills. National Education, 48(1), 685–716.
• Kitchen, H., Bethell, G., Fordham, E., Henderson, K., & Li, R. R. (2019). OECD reviews of evaluation and assessment in education: Student assessment in Turkey. OECD Reviews of Evaluation and Assessment in Education. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5edc0abe-en
• Kiuhara, S. A., Graham, S., & Hawken, L. S. (2009). Teaching writing to high school students: A national survey. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(1), 136–160. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013097
• Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford Press.
• Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2008). Introducing technological pedagogical content knowledge. In AACTE Committee on Innovation and Technology (Eds.), Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK) for educators (pp. 3-29). Routledge.
• Koh, K., & DePass, C. (2019). Developing teachers' assessment literacy: Multiple perspectives in action. In K. Koh, C. DePass, & S. Steel (Eds.), Developing teachers' assessment literacy: A tapestry of ideas and inquiries (pp. 1–6). Brill Sense. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004385672_001
• Kokkokoğlu, H. (2021). Opinions of Turkish teachers on writing education [Unpublished master's thesis]. Gazi University, Ankara.
• Kuhlemeier, H., van Til, A., Hemker, B., de Klijn, W., & Feenstra, H. (2013). Balans van de schrijfvaardigheid in het basis- en speciaal basisonderwijs 2. Uitkomsten van de peiling in 2009 in groep 5, groep 8 en de eindgroep van het SBO (PPON-reeks nummer 53) [Balance of writing skills in primary and special primary education 2. Results of the survey in 2009 in group 5, group 8 and the final group of SBO (PPON series number 53]. Stichting Cito Instituut voor Toetsontwikkeling.
• Lam, S. T. E. (2021). A web-based feedback platform for peer and teacher feedback on writing: An activity theory perspective. Computers & Composition, 62, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2021.102666 8755-4615
• Landis, D. (2003). Reading and writing as social, cultural practices: Implications for literacy education. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 19(3), 281–307. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573560308213
• Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563–575.
• Ministry of National Education [MoNE]. (2017). Öğretmenlik mesleği genel yeterlikleri [General competencies of the teaching profession]. Author. Retrieved June 27, 2022 from https://oygm.meb.gov.tr/dosyalar/StPrg/Ogretmenlik_Meslegi_Genel_Yeterlikleri.pdf
• Ministry of National Education [MoNE]. (2020). Dört beceride Türkçe dil sınavı: Pilot çalışma sonuçları [Turkish language test in four skills: Results of the pilot study] (Report No. 11). Author.
• Ministry of National Education [MoNE]. (2019). T.C. Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı 2019-2023 stratejik planı [T.R. Ministry of National Education 2019-2023 strategic plan]. Retrieved June 27, 2022 from http://sgb.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2019_12/31105532_Milli_EYitim_BakanlYYY_2019-2023_ Stratejik_PlanY__31.12.pdf
• Mo, Y., Kopke, R. A., Hawkins, L. K., Troia, G. A., & Olinghouse, N. G. (2014). The neglected "R" in a time of common core. The Reading Teacher, 67(6), 445–453. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1227
• Molloy, E., Boud, D., & Henderson, M. (2020). Developing a learning-centered framework for feedback literacy. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(4), 527–540. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1667955
• Myers, J., Scales, R. Q., Grisham, D. L., Wolsey, T. D., Dismuke, S., Smetana, L., Yoder, K. K., Ikpeze, C., Ganske, K. & Martin, S. (2016). What about writing? A national exploratory study of writing instruction in teacher preparation programs. Literacy Research and Instruction, 55(4), 309–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388071.2016.1198442
• OECD. (2005). Teacher matters: Attracting, developing, and retaining effective teachers. Author.
• OECD. (2019). TALIS 2018 results (Volume I): Teachers and school leaders as lifelong learners. Author. https://doi.org/10.1787/1d0bc92a-en
• OECD. (2021). Education at a glance 2021: OECD indicators. Author. https://doi.org/10.1787/b35a14e5-en
• Parr, J. M., & Jesson, R. (2016). Mapping the landscape of writing instruction in New Zealand primary school classrooms. Reading and Writing, 29(5), 981–1011. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9589-5
• Parr, J. M., & Limbrick, L. (2010). Contextualising practice: Hallmarks of effective teachers of writing. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(3), 583–590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.09.004
• Peterson, S. S., & McClay, J. (2014). A national study of teaching and assessing writing in Canadian
• middle grades classrooms. McGill Journal of Education, 49(1), 17–39. https://doi.org/10.7202/1025770ar
• Picou, A. (2020). Are schools making writing a priority? New study shows students are not spending enough time writing. Learning Lab Agency.
• Ralli, A. M., Dimakos, I. C., Dockrell, J. E., & Papoulidi, A. (2022). Teacher practices for teaching writing in Greek primary schools. Reading and Writing, 35, 1599–1626. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-022-10258-6
• Rietdijk, S., Janssen, T., Van Weijen, D., Van den Bergh, H., & Rijlaarsdam, G. (2017). Improving writing in primary schools through a comprehensive writing program. Journal of Writing Research, 9(2), 173–225. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2017.09.02.04
• Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 23–74.
• Seçer, İ. (2015). Psikolojik test geliştirme ve uyarlama süreci [Psychological test development and adaptation process]. Anı.
• Smidt, J., Solheim, R., & Aasen, A. J. (2011). On the traces of good writing education: A book for teachers in all subjects. Tapir.
• Streiner, D. L. (1994). Figuring out factors: the use and misuse of factor analysis. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 39(3), 135–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/070674379403900303
• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Pearson.
• Tağa, T., & Ünlü, S. (2013). A review on the problems faced in the writing instruction. Electronic Turkish Studies, 8(8), 1285–1299. https://doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.5175
• Tan, O. S., Liu, W. C., & Low, E. L. (2021). Teacher education futures: Innovating policy, curriculum, and practices. In O. S. Tan, W. C. Liu, & E. L. Low (Eds.), Teacher education in the 21st century: Singapore's evolution and innovation (pp. 1–9). Springer.
• Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2015). Foundations of mixed methods research (Y. Dede & S. B. Demir, Trans.). Anı.
• The United Kingdom Department of Education. (2012). The research evidence on writing. Author.
• Tok, M., & Ünlü, S. (2014). Evaluation of the writing skill problems in accordance with elemantary, middle and high school teachers' opinion comperatively. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences, 13(50), 73–95. https://doi.org/10.17755/esosder.04506
• Troia, G. (2014). Evidence-based practices for writing instruction (Document No. IC-5). University of Florida.
• Troia, G. A., & Olinghouse, N. G. (2013). The common core state standards and evidence-based educational practices: The case of writing. School Psychology Review, 42(3), 343–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2013.12087478
• U. S. National Center for Education Statistics. (2012). The nation's report card: Writing 2011. U.S. Department of Education.
• VERBI Software. (2021). MAXQDA 2022 [Computer software]. Author.
• Wyatt-Smith, C., & Jackson, C. (2020). Australian writing survey: Building an evidence base (Research Brief: Part On). Institute for Learning Sciences and Teacher Education.
• Yamaç, A., & Öztürk, E. (2018). An evaluation of Turkish primary school teachers' practices and perceptions of teaching writing: A mixed method study. HU Journal of Education, 33(4), 846–867. https://doi.org/10.16986/HUJE.2018037559

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.