Abstract

The article focuses the use and reflection of explanatory videos in pedagogical contexts from an interdisciplinary perspective and with regard to teacher reflection and production processes in a joint primary school pedagogical study (with a focus on mathematical learning processes) and Catholic religion education study (with a focus on secondary school teacher education). With an explorative research question and an interpretative qualitative research design, teachers’ reflections of explanatory videos produced by learners as well as teachers are analyzed abductively to gain in-depth insights into potentials and obstacles of the usage of explanatory videos in the context of learning processes. In the primary school pedagogical study, students produce multilingual explanatory videos (n = 18) of the ‘Auxiliary task’, a mental calculation strategy, which the multilingual teachers reflect (n = 6), and in the Catholic religion education study, teachers produce explanatory videos for making ‘encountering‘ processes possible (n = 17) and both studies are linked with a joint research question. The main insights into potentials and obstacles are that explanatory videos can be used didactically for a) identifying student’s subject-and-language-related needs, b) ‘decelerated’ valuation processes and c) iterative revisions of non-viable video productions as well as biases and beliefs of teachers.

Keywords

References

• Abendroth-Timmer, D. (2017). Reflexive Lehrerbildung und Lehrerforschung in der Fremdsprachendidaktik: ein Modell zur Definition und Rahmung von Reflexion [Reflective Teacher Education and Teacher Research in Foreign Language Didactics: A Model for Defining and Framing Reflection]. Zeitschrift für Fremdsprachenforschung, 28(1), 101–126.
• Aeppli, J., & Lötscher, H. (2016). EDAMA–Ein Rahmenmodell für Reflexion [EDAMA – A Framework Model for Reflection]. Beiträge zur Lehrerinnen-und Lehrerbildung, 34(1), 78–97.
• Alkın, Ö., Ceylan, R. & Bayrak, M. (2021). Moscheen in Bewegung. Interdisziplinäre Perspektiven auf muslimische Kultstätten im Migrationskontext [Mosques in Motion: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Muslim Places of Worship in the Context of Migration]. Klaus Schwarz Verlag (De Gruyter).
• Arnold, S., & Zech, J. (2019). Kleine Didaktik des Erklärvideos: Erklärvideos für und mit Lerngruppen erstellen und nutzen [Compact Didactics of Explainer Videos: Creating and Using Explainer Videos for and with Learning Groups]. Westermann.
• Backus, A. (2013). Turkish as an Immigrant Language in Europe. In T.K. Bhatia & C.R. William (Eds.), The Handbook of Bilingualism and Multilingualism (pp. 770-790). Blackwell Handbooks in Linguistics.
• Barzel, B., Leuders, T., Prediger, S. & Hußmann, S. (2013). Designing tasks for engaging students in active knowledge organization. In A. Watson et al. (Eds.), ICMI Study 22 on Task Design – Proceedings of Study Conference (pp. 285-294). ICMI.
• Bateman, J. & Schmidt-Borcherding, F. (2018). The communicative effectiveness of education videos: towards an empirically-motivated multimodal account. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 2(3), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti2030059
• Bateman, J., Thiele, L. & Akin, H. (2021). Explanation videos unravelled: Breaking the waves. Journal of Pragmatics, 175, 112–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.12.009
• Bauer, T. (2011). Die Kultur der Ambiguität: Eine andere Geschichte des Islams [The Culture of Ambiguity: Another History of Islam]. Suhrkamp.
• Bauersfeld, H. (1980). Hidden dimensions in the so-called reality of a mathematics classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 11, 23–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00369158
• Bauersfeld, H., Krummheuer, G. & Voigt, J. (1988). Interactional theory of learning and teaching mathematics and related microethnographical studies. In H.-G. Steiner & A. Vermandel (Eds.), Foundations and methodology of the discipline mathematics education (pp. 174-188). University of Antwerp.
• Beautemps, J. & Bresges, A. (2021). What comprises a successful educational science youtube video? a five-thousand user survey on viewing behaviors and self-perceived ımportance of various variables controlled by content creators. Frontiers in Communication, 5, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2020.600595
• Beautemps, J. & Bresges, A. (2022). The influence of the parasocial relationship on the learning motivation and learning growth with educational Youtube videos in self regulated learning. Frontiers in Education, 7, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.1021798
• Berthold, K. (2012). Explanatory support for learning. In N. M. Seel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the sciences of learning (pp. 1241–1244). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_1723
• Beswick, K. (2007). Influencing teachers' beliefs about teaching mathematics for numeracy to students with mathematics learning difficulties. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development 9, 3-20.
• Beyer, R. & Gerlach, R. (2011). Sprache und Denken. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-93135-7
• Bitzenbauer, P., Höfler, S., Veith, J.M., Winkler, B., Zenger, T. & Kulgemeyer, C. (2023). Exploring the relationship between surface features and explaining quality of Youtube explanatory videos. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-022-10351-w
• Boehme, K. (2023). Interreligiöses begegnungslernen: grundlegung einer fächerkooperierenden didaktik von weltsichten [Interreligious Encounter Learning: Foundation of an Interdisciplinary Didactic Approach to Worldviews]. Herder Verlag.
• Boschki, R. (2017). Art. Subjekt. Wissenschaftlich Religionspädagogisches Lexikon Im Internet [Art. Subject. Scientific Encyclopedia of Religious Education on the Internet]. Wirelex. https:www.wirelex.de
• Bosse, M. (2016). Mathematik fachfremd unterrichten. Zur Professionalität fachbezogener Lehrer-Identität [Teaching Mathematics by Non-Specialists: Towards the Professionalism of Subject-Specific Teacher Identity]. Springer.
• Brandt, B. & Krummheuer, G. (2000). The principle of comparation in interpretative classroom research in mathematics education. Journal für Mathematikdidaktik, 21 (3/4), 193-226. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03338919
• Bruner, J. (1974). Entwurf einer Unterrichtstheorie [Design of a Teaching Theory]. Berlin-Verlag.
• Brousseau, G., Sarrazy, B., & Novotná, J. (2014). Didactic contract in mathematics education. In Lerman, S. (Eds.) Encyclopedia of mathematics education (pp. 153-159). Springer https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4978-8_46
• Bruner, J. (1977). The process of education. Harvard University Press.
• Cendon, E. (2017). Reflexion in der Hochschulweiterbildung: Verbindungsglied zwischen unterschiedlichen Erfahrungswelten [Reflection in Higher Education Continuing Studies: A Link Between Different Worlds of Experience]. Zeitschrift Hochschule und Weiterbildung, 2017(2), 39–44. https://doi.org/10.4119/zhwb-212
• Clark, P., Holden, C., Russell, M. & Downs, H. (2022). The impostor phenomenon in mental health professionals: relationships among compassion fatigue, burnout, and compassion satisfaction. Contemporary Family Therapy, 44, 185-197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-021-09580-y
• Cobb, P., & Bauersfeld, H. (1995). The emergence of mathematical meaning. Interaction in classroom cultures. Routledge.
• Dewey, J. (2000). Demokratie und Erziehung: Eine Einleitung in die philosophische Pädagogik [Democracy and Education: An Introduction to Philosophical Pedagogy]. Julius Beltz.
• DiSessa, A.A. & Cobb, P. (2004). Ontological ınnovation and the role of theory in design experiments. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 77-103.
• Dorgerloh, S., & Wolf, K. D. (2020). Lernen und Lehren mit Tutorials und Erklärvideos [Learning and Teaching with Tutorials and Explainer Videos]. Julius Beltz.
• Döring, N., & Bortz, J. (2016). Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation in den Sozial- und Humanwissenschaften [Research Methods and Evaluation in the Social and Human Sciences]. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41089-5
• Eriksson, T., Mao, L. & Villeval, M.C (2017). Saving face and group identity. Experimental Economics 20, 622-647. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-016-9502-3
• Fischbein, E. (1989). Tacit models and mathematical reasoning. For the Learning of Mathematics, 9(2), 9–14.
• Garcia, O., & Wei, L. (2014). Translanguaging. Language, bilingualism, and education. Palgrave Macmillan.
• Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in Ethnomethodology. Prentice-Hall.
• Glaser, B. & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
• Gmoser, A., Mesanovic, M., Wenig, E., & Yagdi, S. (2023). Christlich-Islamischer Religionsunterricht im Teamteaching.: Empirische Einblicke in Perspektiven von Lernenden und Lehrenden [Christian-Islamic Religious Education in Team Teaching: Empirical Insights into Perspectives of Learners and Teachers]. In T. Krobath & A. Taschl-Erber (Eds.), Schriften der Kirchlichen Pädagogischen Hochschule Wien/Krems: Band 26. Konfessionell - kooperativ - interreligiös: Liegt die Zukunft des Religionsunterrichts im Miteinander? [Writings of the Church College of Education Vienna/Krems: Volume 26. Denominational - Cooperative - Interreligious: Does the Future of Religious Education Lie in Collaboration?] (pp. 301–323). LIT Verlag.
• Göbel, K., & Gösch, A. (2019). Die Nutzung kollegialer Reflexion von Unterrichtsvideos im Praxissemester [The Use of Collegial Reflection on Teaching Videos during the Practical Semester]. In M. Degeling, N. Franken, S. Freund, S. Greiten, D. Neuhaus & J. Schellenbach-Zell (Eds.), Herausforderung Kohärenz: Praxisphasen in der universitären Lehrerbildung. Bildungswissenschaftliche und fachdidaktische Perspektiven [Challenge of Coherence: Practical Phases in University Teacher Education. Educational and Subject-Didactic Perspectives] (pp. 277–288). Verlag Julius Klinkhardt.
• Goffman, E. (1967). On face-work: An analysis of ritual elements in social interaction. In E. Goffman (Ed.), Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behaviour (pp. 5–45). Doubleday.
• Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Harvard University Press.
• Gogus, A. (2012). Constructivist learning. In Seel, N.M. (Ed.) Encyclopedia of the sciences of learning (pp. 783-786). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_142
• Gravemeijer, K. & Cobb, P. (2006). Design research from a learning perspective. In P. Cobb, K. Gravemeijer, S. McKenney & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Educational design research (p. 45- 85). Routledge.
• Gray, E. & Tall, D. (1992). Success and failure in mathematics: procept and procedure. In E. Board (Eds.), Workshop on mathematics education and computers (pp. 209–215). Taipei National University.
• Grümme, B. (2007). Vom Anderen eröffnete Erfahrung: Zur Neubestimmung des Erfahrungsbegriffs in der Religionsdidaktik [Experience Opened by the Other: Redefining the Concept of Experience in Religious Education Didactics]. Herder.
• Grzega, J. & Schöner, M. (2008). The didactic model ldl (lernen durch lehren) as a way of preparing students for communication in a knowledge society. Journal of Education for Teaching, 34(3), 167-175.
• Harding, S. (1991). Whose science? Whose knowledge? Thinking from women's lives. Cornell University Press.
• Hassan, A., Gunied, H., Seyadi, A.Y., Alkhaja, A.M. (2023). The usage of digital media in society. In M. Al-Sartawi, A.M.A. Razzaque & A., Kamal (Eds.), From the internet of things to the internet of ideas: the role of artificial intelligence. EAMMIS 2022. Lecture notes in networks and systems (pp. 135-146). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17746-0_12
• Heil, S. (2018). Art. Habitus. Wissenschaftlich Religionspädagogisches Lexikon Im Internet [Art. Habitus. Scholarly Religious Education Lexicon Online]. Wirelex. https://www.wirelex.de
• Herzog, W. (1995). Reflexive Praktika in der Lehrerinnen- und Lehrerbildung [Reflective Practices in Teacher Education]. Beiträge zur Lehrerinnen- und Lehrerbildung, 13(3), 253–273. https://doi.org/10.25656/01:13309
• Huwer, J., Irion, T., Kuntze, S., Schaal, S., & Thyssen, C. (2019). From TPaCK to DPaCK - Digitalisation in education requires more than technical knowlege. In M. Shelley & S. A. Kiray (Eds.), Education research highlights in mathematics, science and technology 2019 (pp. 298-309). ISRES Publishing.
• Jungwirth, H. (2003). Interpretative research in mathematics education. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik, 35(5), 189- 201.
• Käpnick, F. (2014). Mathematiklernen in der Grundschule [Mathematics Learning in Primary School]. Springer.
• Kirkham, R. (1992). Theories of truth. MIT Press.
• Klein, J. (2009). Erklären-was, erklären-wie, erklären-warum. Typologie und Komplexität zentraler Akte der Welterschließung [Explaining-what, explaining-how, explaining-why. Typology and Complexity of Central Acts of Understanding the World]. In R. Vogt (Ed.), Erklären. Gesprächsanalytische und fachdidaktische Perspektiven [Explaining. Conversation Analytical and Subject Didactic Perspectives] (pp. 25-36). Stauffenburg-Verlag.
• Klinger, M & Walter, D (2022). How users review frequently used apps and videos containing mathematics. The International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education, 29(1), 25 - 35
• Knoblauch, C. (2022). Combining and Balancing Project-Based and Blended learning in Education. International Journal of Advanced Corporate Learning, 15(1), 35–44.
• Kommer, S., Wolf, K. D., Cwielong, I. A., & Klieme, K. (2021). Leistungsoptimierung von Schülerinnen und Schülern durch schulbezogene Erklärvideonutzung auf YouTube: Entschulungsstrategie oder Selbsthilfe? [Performance Optimization of Students through School-related Explainer Video Usage on YouTube: De-schooling Strategy or Self-Help?] MedienPädagogik Zeitschrift Für Theorie Und Praxis Der Medienbildung, 42, 380–408. https://doi.org/10.21240/mpaed/42/2021.12.31.X.
• Korntreff, S. & Prediger, S. (2022). Verstehensangebote von YouTube-Erklärvideos – Konzeptualisierung und Analyse am Beispiel algebraischer Konzepte [Understanding Opportunities of YouTube Explainer Videos – Conceptualization and Analysis Using Algebraic Concepts as an Example]. Journal für Mathematik Didaktik 43, 281–310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13138-021-00190-7
• Krämer, A. & Böhrs, S. (2016). How do consumers evaluate explainer videos? an empirical study on the effectiveness and efficiency of different explainer video formats. Journal of Education and Learning, 6(1), 254. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v6n1p254
• Krauthausen, G. (2012). Digitale Medien im Mathematikunterricht [Digital Media in Mathematics Education]. Springer Spektrum.
• Krauthausen, G. (2018). Einführung in die Mathematikdidaktik – Grundschule [Introduction to Mathematics Didactics – Primary School]. Springer Spektrum.
• Krummheuer, G. & Naujok, N. (1999). Fundaments and examples of interpretative classroom research. Leske + Budrich.
• Kulgemeyer, C. (2020a). A framework of effective science explanation videos ınformed by criteria for ınstructional explanations. Research in Science Education, 50(6), 2441– 2462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9787-7
• Kulgemeyer, C. (2020b). Didaktische Kriterien für gute Erklärvideos [Didactic Criteria for Good Explainer Videos]. In Dorgerloh, S. & Wolf, K. D. (Eds.), Lehren und lernen mit Tutorials und Erklärvideos [Teaching and Learning with Tutorials and Explainer Videos] (pp. 70-75). Julius Beltz.
• Kulgemeyer, C. & Peters, C. H. (2016). Exploring the explaining quality of physics online ex- planatory videos. European Journal of Physics, 37(6), 65705. https://doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/37/6/065705
• Kulgemeyer, C. & Wittwer, J. (2022). Misconceptions in physics explainer videos and the ıllusion of understanding: an experimental study. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-022-10265-7
• Kunsteller, J. (2021). Entdeckungs- und Erklärprozesse bei der Erstellung von Erklärvideos im Mathematikunterricht [Discovery and Explanation Processes in the Creation of Explainer Videos in Mathematics Education]. In C. Schreiber & R. Klose (Eds.), Mathematik, Sprache und Medien – Lernen, lehren und forschen mit Digitalen medien, Bd. 7 [Mathematics, Language, and Media – Learning, Teaching, and Researching with Digital Media, Vol. 7] (pp. 37–59). WTM Verlag.
• Kunsteller, J. (2022). Children’s norms of explanations in explanation videos. In CERME (Eds.), Twelfth congress of the european society for research in mathematics education (pp. 1-9). HAL open science.
• Kuzu, T. (2019). Multilingual conceptual development processes – Learning process study of German- Turkish learners understanding of the part-of-whole concept. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007 /978-3-658-25761-3
• Kuzu, T. (2022a). Pre-algebraic aspects in arithmetic strategies – The generalization and conceptual understanding of the ‘Auxiliary Task’. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 18(12), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12656
• Kuzu, T. (2022b). Understanding the ‘Auxiliary Task’ conceptually – Discrete versus continuous cardinal objects. In C. Fernández, S. Llinares, A. Gutiérrez, & N. Planas (Eds.), Proceedings of the 45th PME-Conference (Vol. 3, pp. 99-106). Alicante University Press (PME).
• Kuzu, T. (2023a). Mental Calculation Strategies as a ‘Missing Link’ between Arithmetic and Algebra – Insights into the 'Auxiliary Task' and its Role in the ‘Cognitive Gap’. Turkish Journal of Mathematics Education 4(1), 1-23.
• Kuzu, T. (2023b). Interactional forces in multilingual discourses – A teachers’ perspective on learners’ agency. In M. Ayalon, B. Koichu, R. Leikin, L. Rubel & M. Tabach (Eds.), Proceedings of the 46th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Vol. 3 (pp. 235-242). Haifa University Press (PME).
• Kuzu, T. (2023c). Multilingual explanation videos of the ‘Auxiliary Task’ – Insights into multilingual learners’ pre-algebraic generalizations. In J. Novotna & H. Moraova (Eds.), Proceedings of the 23rd International Symposium of Elementary Mathematics Teaching (pp. 190-201). Charles University Press.
• Kuzu, T. (2023d). Multilingual meaning making – an explorative study of German-Turkish learners’ translanguaging processes regarding the part-whole-concept. Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik, 44(4), 325-353.
• Kuzu, T. (2023e). Language in Mathematics Education – On the epistemic and reconstructivistic facet of languaging processes in linguistically heterogenous groups of learners. Beta: Jurnal Tadris Matematika, 16(2), 55-84. https://doi.org/10.20414/betajtm.v16i2
• Kuzu, T. (2024a). Mehrsprachige Erklärvideos zur ,Hilfsaufgabe’ – Gelingensbedingungen und Potentiale einer mehrsprachigen digitalen Lehr-Lernumgebung [English translation]. In E. Baschek, M. Fetzer, R. Klose, C. Schreiber & E. Söbbeke (Hrsg.), Sprachlich-kulturelle Ressourcen im Mathematikunterricht der Primarstufe [English translation] (pp. 39- 62). WTM. https://doi.org/10.37626/GA9783959872867.0.03
• Kuzu, T. (2024b). Activating multilingual learners’ resources in superdiverse classrooms – An action-research study on the usage of ‘multilingualism’ cards and ChatGPT for activating translanguaging processes in Primary School. In R. Grassinger et al. (Eds.), BildungsWelten Grundschule – Heterogenität gestalten: Bd. 2 [Educational Worlds Primary School – Shaping Heterogeneity: Vol. 2] (pp.1-17). Waxmann. Accepted.
• Lamnek, S., & Krell, C. (2016). Qualitative sozialforschung. Julius Beltz.
• Leinhardt, G. (2001). Instructional explanations: a commonplace for teaching and location for contrast. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 333–357). American Educational Research Association.
• Leinhardt, G. (2010). Introduction: explaining ınstructional explanations. In M. K. Stein & L. Kucan (Eds.), Instructional explanations in the disciplines (pp. 1–5). Springer.
• Leiningen, A. (2020). Kinder erklären für Kinder mathematische Sachverhalte mit Lehrfilmen [Children Explain Mathematical Concepts to Children with Educational Films]. In B. Brandt, L. Bröll & H. Dausend (Eds.), Digitales lernen in der Grundschule II: Aktuelle Trends in Forschung und Praxis [Digital Learning in Primary School II: Current Trends in Research and Practice] (pp. 204-220). Waxmann.
• Lin, C.-H. (2022). Developing mental number line games to improve young children’s number knowledge and basic arithmetic skills. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 222, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2022.105479
• Lingnau, A. & Hoppe, U. (1994). Modelling and supporting learning activities in a computer-integrated classroom. In G. Stahl (Ed.), Computer support for collaborative learning (pp. 589-590). Routledge.
• Ludes-Adamy, P. & Schütte, M. (2018). Cooperative learning in mathematics and computer science learning environments. In Cerme (Eds.), Proceedings of the IV ERME Topic Conference ‘Classroom-based research on mathematics and language’ (pp. 103-109). CERME.
• Maisano, M.-L. (2019). Beschreiben und Erklären beim Lernen von Mathematik. Rekonstruktion mündlicher Sprachhandlungen von mehrsprachigen Grundschulkindern [Describing and Explaining in Learning Mathematics. Reconstruction of Oral Language Practices by Multilingual Primary School Children]. Springer.
• Mayer, R. E. & Fiorella, L. (2022). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108894333
• Mediendienst Integration [MDI]. (2023). Zahlen und Fakten [Numbers and facts]. URL: https://mediendienst-integration.de/integration/schule.html
• Mesanovic, M. (2023). Entwicklung interreligiöser Kompetenzen bei islamischen Religionslehrkräften [Development of Interreligious Competencies Among Islamic Religious Education Teachers]. Kohlhammer.
• Meyer, M. (2009). Abduction, induction–confusion. Notes on the logic of interpretative social research. Journal of Educational Science, 12, 302-320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11618-009-0067-1
• Meyer, M. (2010). Abduction—A logical view for investigating and initiating processes of discovering mathematical coherences. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 74, 185–205.
• Moschkovich, J. (2010). Language and mathematics education: multiple perspectives and directions for research. Information Age Press.
• Myers-Scotton, C. (2006). Multiple voices: An introduction to bilingualism. Blackwell Publishing.
• Neuweg, H. G. (2005). Emergenzbedingungen pädagogischer Könnerschaft [Emergence Conditions of Pedagogical Expertise]. In H. Heid & C. Harteis (Eds.), Verwertbarkeit. ein Qualitätskriterium (erziehungs-)wissenschaftlichen Wissens? [Utility. A Quality Criterion for (Educational) Scientific Knowledge?] (pp. 205–228). VS-Verlag.
• Nitsche, M. (2020). Erklärvideos: aus der Praxis. für die Praxis [Explainer videos: from practice. for practice]. Tredition-Verlag.
• Nührenbörger, M., & Steinbring, H. (2009). Forms of mathematical interaction in different social settings: Examples from students’, teachers’ and teacher-students’ communication about mathematics. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 12, 111-132.
• Oser, F., Hascher, T. & Spychiger, M. (1999). Lernen aus Fehlern. Zur Psychologie des negativen Wissens [Learning from mistakes: On the psychology of negative knowledge]. In W. Althof (Ed.), Fehlerwelten [Worlds of Errors] (pp. 11-41). Leske & Budrich.
• Oser, F. & Blömeke, S. (2012). Überzeugungen von Lehrpersonen [Beliefs of teachers]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, (4)58. 415 – 421.
• Paavola, S. (2011). Lorenzo Magnani: Abductive cognition. The epistemological and eco-cognitive dimensions of hypothetical reasoning. Journal for General Philosophy of Science, 42, 201–205.
• Pavlenko, A. (2011). Thinking and speaking in two languages. Multilingual Matters.
• Peirce, C. S. (1903). Lectures on pragmatism [held from March, 26. to May, 14. at Harvard University]. MSS 300-316; EP II: 133–241; HLP; CP 5.14–212; in part in SEM I: 431–462.
• Prediger, S. (2019). Theorizing in Design Research: Methodological reflections on developing and connecting theory elements for language-responsive mathematics classrooms. Avances de Investigación en Educación Matemática, 15, 5-27. https://doi.org/10.35763/aiem.v0i15.265
• Prediger, S., & Rösike, K. (2019). Fortbildungsdidaktische Qualitätsentwicklung durch gegenstandsbezogene Design-research-prozesse – Einblicke am Beispielgegenstand der Potentialförderung [Professional Development Didactic Quality Development through Subject-related Design Research Processes – Insights Using the Example of Potential Fostering]. In B. Groot-Wilken & R. Koerber (Eds.), Nachhaltige Professionalisierung für Lehrerinnen und Lehrer [Sustainable Professionalization for Teachers] (pp. 147–170). Wbv-Verlag.
• Ratzke, C. (2021). Hochschuldidaktisches interreligiöses Begegnungslernen - eine empirisch-explorative Studie zum Potenzial interreligiöser Kompetenzentwicklung in der Ausbildung von Ethik- und Religionslehrer_innen [Higher Education Didactic Interreligious Encounter Learning - an Empirical-Exploratory Study on the Potential of Interreligious Competence Development in the Training of Ethics and Religious Education Teachers]. Waxmann.
• Ratzke, C., & Meyer, G. (2022). Interreligiöse Kompetenzentwicklungen durch Erklärvideos: Diskussion von Potenzialen und Herausforderungen eines digitalen Lernformats. Religionspädagogische Beiträge [Interreligious Competence Development through Explanatory Videos: Discussion of Potentials and Challenges of a Digital Learning Format. Contributions to Religious Education]. Journal for Religion in Education, 45(3), 45-59.
• Ratzke, C., & Meyer, G. (2024). Othering im Kontext religiöser und interreligiöser Bildung: Potenziale subjektorientierter Lernprozesse aus empirischer Perspektive. Religionspädagogische Beiträge [Othering in the Context of Religious and Interreligious Education: Potentials of Subject-oriented Learning Processes from an Empirical Perspective. Contributions to Religious Education]. Journal for Religion in Education, 46. Advance online publication.
• Ray, P. R. (2023). ChatGPT: A comprehensive review on background, applications, key challenges, bias, ethics, limitations and future scope. Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems, 3(23), 121–154.
• Redder, A., Guckelsberger, S. & Graßer, B. (2013). Mündliche Wissensprozessierung und Konnektierung. Sprachliche Handlungs­fähigkeiten in der Primarstufe [Oral Knowledge Processing and Connection. Linguistic Skills in Primary Education]. Waxmann.
• Römer, S. & Nührenbörger, M. (2018). Entdeckerfilme im Mathematikunterricht der Grundschule – Entwicklung und Erforschung von videobasierten Lernumgebungen [Discovery Films in Primary School Mathematics Education – Development and Research of Video-Based Learning Environments]. In Fachgruppe Didaktik der Mathematik der Universität Paderborn (Eds.), Beiträge zum Mathematikunterricht [Contributions to Mathematics Education] (pp. 1511-1514). WTM Verlag.
• Rosenthal, G. (2018). Interpretative social research: An introduction. Göttingen University press.
• Schacht, F., Barzel, B., Daum, S., Klinger, A., Klinger, M., Schröder, P., Schüler, A. & Wardemann, S. (2019). Das fachliche Lernen stärken. Zur Nutzung von Erklärvideos an Schulen in sozial herausfordernder Lage [Strengthening Subject-specific Learning: Utilizing Explainer Videos in Schools Facing Social Challenges]. DDS – Die Deutsche Schule, 111(4), 435–455.
• Scherer, P., Nührenbörger, M., & Ratte, L. (2020). Reflexionen von Multiplikatorinnen und Multiplikatoren zum Gestaltungsprinzip der Teilnehmendenorientierung – Fachspezifische Professionalisierung beim Design von Fortbildungen [Reflections of Multipliers on the Design Principle of Participant Orientation – Subject-specific Professionalization in the Design of Continuing Education]. Journal für Mathematikdidaktik, 42(2), 431–458.
• Schmidt, R. (2020). Post-digitale Bildung [Post-digital Education]. In M. Demantowsky (Ed.), Was macht die Digitalisierung mit den Hochschulen? Einwürfe und Provokationen [What does Digitalization do to Universities? Insights and Provocations] (pp. 57–70). Walter de Gruyter.
• Schmidt-Thieme, B. (2009). “Definition, Satz, Beweis” – Erklärgewohnheiten im Fach Mathematik ['Definition, Theorem, Proof' – Explanation Habits in the Field of Mathematics]. In Vogt, J. (Ed.), Erklären: Gesprächsanalytische und fachdidaktische Perspektiven [Explaining: Conversation Analytical and Subject Didactic Perspectives] (pp. 123-132). Stauffenburg.
• Schneider, M., Vamvakoussi, X., & Van Dooren, W. (2012). Conceptual change. In N. M. Seel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the sciences of learning (pp. 735–738). Springer.
• Schorn, A. (2022). Online explainer videos: features, benefits, and effects. Frontiers in Communication, 7, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2022.1034199
• Schreiber, C., & Klose, R. (2017). Mathematical audio-podcasts for teacher education and school. Teachers and Curriculum, 17(2), 41-46.
• Schulz, A., & Walter, D. (2019). Darstellungen im Mathematikunterricht – real, mental, digital [Representations in Mathematics Education – Real, Mental, Digital]. In A. S. Steinweg (Ed.), Darstellen und Kommunizieren [Representing and Communicating] (pp. 39–54). University of Bamberg Press.
• Schütte, M., Friesen, R. A., & Jung, J. (2019). Interactional analysis: A method for analyzing mathematical learning processes in interactions. In G. Kaiser, & N. Presmeg (Eds.), Compendium for early career researchers in mathematics education (pp. 101-129). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-1563 6-7_5
• Selter, C. & Walter, D. (2020). Supporting mathematical learning processes by means of mathematics conferences and mathematics language tools. In M. van den Heuvel-Panhuizen (Eds.), International reflections on the netherlands didactics of mathematics. icme-13 monographs (pp. 229-255). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20223-1_13
• Sherin, M.G., & Drake, C. (2009). Curriculum strategy framework: investigating patterns in teachers’ use of a reform-based elementary mathematics curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 41(4), 467–500.
• Siegler, R. Saffran, J., Gershoff, E. & Eisenberg, N. (2021). Entwicklungspsychologie im Kindes- und Jugendalter [Developmental Psychology in Childhood and Adolescence]. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-62772-3
• Sosa, E. (1980). The raft and the pyramid: coherence versus foundations in the theory of knowledge. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 5(1), 3-26.
• Steinbring, H. (2006). What makes a sign a mathematical sign? An epistemological perspective on mathematical interaction. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 61(1/2), 133-162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-006-5892-z
• Steinke, I. (2004). Quality criteria in qualitative research. In U. Flick, E. von Kardorff & I. Steinke (Eds.), A companion to qualitative research (pp. 184–190). Sage.
• Sterzing, F. (2022). Zur Lernwirksamkeit von Erklärvideos in der Physik [On the Learning Effectiveness of Explanatory Videos in Physics]. Logos Verlag.
• Strauss, A. & Corbin, J (1990). Basics of qualitative research. Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Sage.
• Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. M. Gass & C. G. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235-256). Newbury House.
• Tenberg, R. (2021). Didaktische Erklärvideos: ein Praxishandbuch [Didactic Explainer Videos: A Practical Handbook]. Franz Steiner Verlag.
• Thyssen, C., Huwer, J., Irion, T. & Schaal, S. (2023). From TPACK to DPACK: The “digitality-related pedagogical and content knowledge”-model in stem-education. Education sciences 13(769), 1-21.
• Tiedemann, K., & Fetzer, M. (2018). The interplay of language and objects in the process of abstracting. In J. Moschkovich, D. Wagner, J. Rodrigues Mendes, & M. Schütte (Eds.), Language and communication in mathematics education – international perspectives (pp. 139-155). Springer.
• Türling, J. (2014). Die professionelle Fehlerkompetenz von (angehenden) Lehrkräften. Eine empirische Untersuchung im Rechnungswesenunterricht [The Professional Error Competence of (Future) Teachers: An Empirical Study in Accounting Education]. Springer.
• Unser, A. (2018). Social inequality and interreligious learning. An empirical analysis of students' agency to cope with interreligious learning tasks. Lit-Verlag.
• Unser, A. (2022). Über Möglichkeiten und Grenzen des Abbaus von Vorurteilen und Stereotypen durch Interreligiöses Lernen [On the Possibilities and Limitations of Reducing Prejudices and Stereotypes through Interreligious Learning]. In M. Khorchide, K. Lindner, A. Roggenkamp, C. P. Sajak, & H. Simojoki (Eds.), Religiöse Bildung kooperativ: Band 1. Stereotype - Vorurteile - Ressentiments: Herausforderungen für das interreligiöse Lernen [Cooperative Religious Education: Volume 1. Stereotypes - Prejudices - Resentments: Challenges for Interreligious Learning] (pp. 147–164). V&R unipress.
• van den Bos, G. R. (2015). APA dictionary of psychology. American Psychological Association.
• von Aufschnaiter, C., Fraij, A., & Kost, D. (2019). Reflexion und Reflexivität in der Lehrerbildung. Herausforderung Lehrer*innenbildung [Reflection and Reflexivity in Teacher Education: Challenge Teacher Training]. Zeitschrift zur Konzeption, Gestaltung und Diskussion, 2(1), 144–159. https://doi.org/10.4119/hlz-2439
• Wagner, A. & Wörn, C. (2011). Erklären lernen –Mathematik verstehen: Ein Praxisbuch mit Lernangeboten [Learning to Explain – Understanding Mathematics: A Practical Handbook with Learning Activities]. Kallmeyer.
• Walter, D. & Dexel, T. (2020). Facing heterogeneity in mathematics education in primary schools with digital media? A didactical perspective on the potential of digital media supported mathematics education in primary schools. Zeitschrift für Grundschulforschung, 13, 65-80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42278-019-00071-6
• Waxer, M., & Morton, J. B. (2012). Cognitive conflict and learning. In N. M. Seel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the sciences of learning (pp. 585–587). Springer.
• Wilson, T. P. (1981). Theorien der Interaktion und Modelle soziologischer Erklärung [Theories of Interaction and Models of Sociological Explanation]. In A. B. Soziologen (Ed.), Alltagswissen, Interaktion und gesellschaftliche Wirklichkeit [Everyday Knowledge, Interaction, and Social Reality] (pp. 54- 79). Westdeutscher Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-14511-0_3
• Wittmann, E. C. (2021). Connecting mathematics and mathematics education. collected papers on mathematics education as a design science. Springer.
• Wolf, K. D. (2015). Bildungspotenziale von Erklärvideos und Tutorials auf YouTube. Audio-Visuelle Enzyklopädie, adressatengerechtes Bildungsfernsehen, Lehr-Lern-Strategie oder partizipative Peer Education? [Educational Potentials of Explanatory Videos and Tutorials on YouTube: Audio-Visual Encyclopedia, Audience-Adapted Educational Television, Teaching-Learning Strategy, or Participatory Peer Education?]. Merz, 1(59), 30-36.
• Wolf, K. D., & Kulgemeyer, C. (2021). Lehren und lernen mit Erklärvideos im Fachunterricht [Teaching and Learning with Explanatory Videos in Subject Instruction]. In G. Brägger & H.-G. Rolff (Eds.), Handbuch Lernen mit digitalen Medien [Handbook of Learning with Digital Media] (pp. 474–487). Julius Beltz.
• Zimring, J. (2019). Holistic coherence in thinking, or describing a system of how humans reason and think. In J. Zimring (Ed.), What science is and how it really works (pp. 66-102). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108569149.004

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.