Effects of the theory of didactical situations’ application in mathematics education: A metasynthesis
Julius Ceasar Hortelano 1 * , Maricar Prudente 1
More Detail
1 Department of Science Education, De La Salle University- Manila, Philippines
* Corresponding Author

Abstract

Conceptualized in France during the sixties, the Theory of Didactical Situations [TDS] is a pivotal framework for developing mathematics teaching and learning processes. Despite the increasing qualitative studies over the last ten years, there remains a dearth of analysis of its effects on mathematics education. Through a Grounded Formal Theory approach, this paper presents the metasynthesis of 28 studies screened from four research databases— ProQuest, EBSCO, SCOPUS, and JSTOR. Data extraction was performed to enumerate the author/s, country, publication year, and connected theoretical approaches with TDS.  Subsequently, the studies were categorized into three axial codes based on the studies’ goals of applying TDS: lesson sequence, teacher development, and learning innovations. The synthesis underscores TDS’ capacity to improve the sequence of mathematics lessons, particularly geometry and number patterns; develop teachers’ pedagogical practices in teaching elementary, high school, and college students; and be a practical tool in innovating didactical resources for learning mathematics. TDS was also associated with other theoretical approaches, such as constructivism, realistic mathematics education, gamification, and technology-based instruction. Most of these effects were rooted in the challenges experienced during the COVID-19 pandemic and the adaptation of TDS to the digital era, including distance and online learning. While the European and Western Asian countries have been at the forefront of TDS integration, the paper advocates for broader global adoption of this theory to enrich mathematics education worldwide.  

Keywords

References

  • Abou-Hayt, I., Dahl, B., & Rump, C. (2019). Teaching the limits of functions using the theory of didactical situations and problem-based learning. In B. V. Nagy, M. Murphy, H-M. Järvinen, & A. Kálmán (Eds.), Proceedings of the 47th SEFI annual conference 2019 (pp. 58-69). European Association for Engineering Education.
  • Alves, F. R. V. (2019). Visualizing the Olympic didactical situation (ODS): teaching mathematics with support of the GeoGebra software. Acta Didactica Napocencia, 12(2), 97-116. https://doi.org/10.24193/adn.12.2.8
  • Alves, F. R. V., de Sousa, R. T., Fontenele, F. C. F. (2022). Three-dimensional geometric perceptions in ENEM: a contribution from Geogebra for mathematics teachers in Brazil. Acta Didactica Napocensia, 15(1), 114-123, https://doi.org/10.24193/adn.15.1.10
  • Anapi, S., Calixto, D.C., Peralta, R., Velasquez, Q., Zamora, A.M., Palanas, V., & Elipane, L. (2021). Concept construction on the area of oblique triangles: a lesson study. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 12(3), 3870-3880.
  • Arsac, G., Balacheff, N., & Mante, M. (1992). Teacher’s role and reproducibility of didactical situations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 23(1), 5-29. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00302312
  • Artigue, M. (2009). Didactical design in mathematics education. In C. Winslow (Eds.), Nordic research in mathematics education: Proceedings of Norma 08 (pp. 5-16). Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789087907839_003
  • Artigue, M. (2014). Potentialities and limitations of the theory of didactic situations for addressing the teaching and learning of mathematics at university level. Research in Mathematics Education, 16(2), 135-138. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2014.918348
  • Artigue, M., Haspekian, M., & Corblin-Lenfant, A. (2014). Introduction to the theory of didactical situations (TDS). In A. Bikner-Ahsbahs, & S. Prediger (Eds.), Networking of theories as a research practice in mathematics education. advances in mathematics education (pp. 47-65). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05389-9_4
  • Bessot, A. (2024). Introduction to the theory of situations: fundamental concepts of the didactics of mathematics. Hal Science. https://hal.science/hal-04500947
  • Bobis, J., Russo, J., Downton, A., Feng, M., Livy, S., McCormick, M., & Sullivan, P. (2021). Instructional moves that increase chances of engaging all students in learning mathematics. Mathematics, 9(6), 582. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9060582
  • Bos, R., Doorman, M., & Piroi, M. (2020). Emergent models in a reinvention activity for learning the slope of a curve. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 59, 100773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2020.100773
  • Brousseau, G. (2002). Theory of didactical situations in mathematics. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47211-2.
  • Clivaz, S. (2015). French didactique des mathématiques and lesson study: a profitable dialogue?. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 4(3), 245-260. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLLS-12-2014-0046
  • Clivaz, S. (2017). Teaching multidigit multiplication: combining multiple frameworks to analyse a class episode. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 96, 305–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-017-9770-7
  • Daher, W., Abo Mokh, A., Shayeb, S., Jaber, R., Saqer, K., Dawood, I., Bsharat, M., & Rabbaa, M. (2022). The design of tasks to suit distance learning in emergency education. Sustainability, 14(3), 1070. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031070
  • Daher, W., Baya’a, N., & Jaber, O. (2022). Understanding prospective teachers’ task design considerations through the lens of the theory of didactical situations. Mathematics, 10(3), 417. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10030417
  • Danisman, S., & Güler, M. (2019). A problem-solving process using the theory of didactical situations: 500 lockers problem. Teaching Innovations, 32(1), 105-116. https://doi.org/10.5937/inovacije1901105D
  • Eaves, Y. D. (2001). A synthesis technique for grounded theory data analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 35(5), 654–663. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01897.x
  • Finfgeld, D. L. (1999). Courage as a process of pushing beyond the struggle. Qualitative Health Research, 9(6), 803–814. https://doi.org/10.1177/104973299129122298
  • Finlayson, K., & Dixon, A. (2008). Qualitative meta-synthesis: a guide for novice. Nurse Researcher, 15(2), c6330. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr2008.01.15.2.59.c6330
  • Genc, M., & Ergan, S. (2022). Teaching geometry through didactical situations: the case of the triangle inequality. Acta Didactica Napocensia, 15(2), 123-141. https://doi.org/10.24193/adn.15.2.8
  • Gök, M., & İnan, M. (2021). Sixth-grade students’ experiences of a digital game-based learning environment: a didactic analysis. Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education, 6(2), 142-157. https://doi.org/10.23917/jramathedu.v6i2.13687
  • Gök, M., Inan, M., & Akbayir, K. (2020). Examining mobile game experiences of prospective primary school teachers and their game designs about teaching math. Elementary Education Online, 19(2), 641-666. https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2020.693115
  • González-Martín, A. S., Bloch, I., Durand-Guerrier, V., & Maschietto, M. (2014). Didactic situations and didactical engineering in university mathematics: cases from the study of calculus and proof. Research in Mathematics Education, 16(2), 117–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2014.918347
  • Hersant, M., & Perrin-Glorian, M. J. (2005). Characterization of an ordinary teaching practice with the help of the theory of didactic situations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 59, 113–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-005-2183-z
  • Hortelano, J. C., & Lapinid, M. R. (2024). Recontextualizing Kalinga’s batek and laga into an ethnomathematical teaching resource: an application of the second generation of didactical engineering. Journal on Mathematics Education, 15(2), 385-402. http://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v15i2.385-402
  • Hoyles, C., & Noss, R. (2003). What can digital technologies take from and bring to research in mathematics education?. In A.J. Bishop, M.A. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & F.K.S. Leung (Eds.), Second international handbook of mathematics education (pp. 323-349). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0273-8_11
  • Job, P., & Schneider, M. (2014). Empirical positivism, an epistemological obstacle in the learning of calculus. ZDM Mathematics Education, 46, 635-646. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-014-0604-0
  • Juandi, D., Kusumah, Y. S., & Tamur, M. (2022). A meta-analysis of the last two decades of realistic mathematics education approaches. International Journal of Instruction, 15(1), 381-400. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15122a
  • Kearney M. H. (2001). Enduring love: a grounded formal theory of women's experience of domestic violence. Research in Nursing & Health, 24(4), 270–282. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.1029
  • Kearney, M. H. (2007). From the sublime to the meticulous: the continuing evolution of grounded formal theory. In A. Bryant & K. Charmaz (Eds.), The Sage handbook of grounded theory (pp. 127-150). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848607941.n6
  • Kozikoğlu, İ. (2019). Analysis of the studies concerning flipped learning model: a comparative meta-synthesis study. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 851-868. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12155a
  • Laborde, C. (2005). The hidden role of diagrams in students’ construction of meaning in geometry. In J. Kilpatrick, C. Hoyles, O. Skovsmose, & P. Valero (Eds.), Meaning in mathematics education (pp. 159-179). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-24040-3_11
  • Lagrange, J. B., & Psycharis, G. (2014). Investigating the potential of computer environments for the teaching and learning of functions: a double analysis from two research traditions. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 19(3), 255-286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-013-9211-3
  • Liptak, J., & Scholtzova, I. (2021). Preparing junior school aged pupils for a circle definition: teaching mathematics within physical education class. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 10(2), 395-408. https://doi.org/10.13187/ejced.2021.2.395
  • Lupu, C. (2017). A historical research on the didactics of mathematics. Journal of Innovation in Psychology, Education and Didactics, 21(1), 69-82. https://jiped.ub.ro/archives/2351
  • Mangiante-Orsola, C., Perrin-Glorian, M. J., & Strømskag, H. (2018). Theory of didactical situations as a tool to understand and develop mathematics teaching practices. Annales de Didactique et de Sciences Cognitives, 23, 145-174. https://doi.org/10.4000/adsc.334
  • Maracci, M., Cazes, C., Vandebrouck, F., & Mariotti, M.A. (2013). Synergies between theoretical approaches to mathematics education with technology: a case study through a cross-analysis methodology. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 84, 461–485. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-013-9495-1
  • Margolinas, C., Coulange, L., & Bessot, A. (2005). What can the teacher learn in the classroom?. Educational Studies in Mathematics 59, 205–234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-005-3135-3
  • Nguyen, T. T., Trinh, P. P., & Tran T. (2019). Realistic mathematics education (RME) and didactical situations in mathematics (DSM) in the context of education reform in Vietnam. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1340, 012032. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1340/1/012032
  • Olmos-Noguera, J.M., Renard-Julián, E.J., & García-Cascales, M.S. (2022). Design of 3D metric geometry study and research activities within a BIM framework. Mathematics, 10(9), 1358. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10091358
  • Palatnik, A. (2022). Didactic situations in project-based learning: the case of numerical patterns and sequences. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 66, 100956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2022.100956
  • Palmas, S., Rojano, T., & Sutherland, R. (2020). Digital technologies as a means of accessing powerful mathematical ideas. A study of adults with low schooling in Mexico. Teaching Mathematics and its Application: An International Journal of the IMA, 40(1), 16-39. https://doi.org/10.1093/teamat/hraa004
  • Rahayu E. G. S., Juandi D., & Jupri, A. (2021). Didactical design for distance concept in solid geometry to develop mathematical representation ability in vocational high school. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1882, 012077. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1882/1/012077
  • Rasmussen, K., & Schmidt, M.C.S. (2022). Together in adidactic situations – student dialogue during reciprocal peer tutoring in mathematics. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 3, 100126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2022.100126
  • Rønning, F. (2021). Opportunities for language enhancement in a learning environment designed on the basis of the theory of didactical situations. ZDM Mathematics Education, 52, 305-316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01199-x
  • Sandelowski, M., & Barroso, J. (2007). Handbook for synthesizing qualitative research. Springer.
  • Sarrazy, B., & Novotná, J. (2013). Didactical contract and responsiveness to didactical contract: a theoretical framework for enquiry into students’ creativity in mathematics. ZDM Mathematics Education, 45, 281–293. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-013-0496-4
  • Sierpinska, A. (2004). Research in mathematics education through a keyhole: task problematization. For the Learning of Mathematics, 24(2), 7–15. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40248450
  • Strauss A., & Corbin J. (1994). Grounded theory methodology: an overview. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 273–285). Sage.
  • Sunawan A., & Rosjanuardi R. (2019). The achievement analysis of Indonesian TIMSS 2011 in mathematics towards didactical situation. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1188, 012041. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1188/1/012041
  • Thunder, K., & Berry III, R. (2016). The promise of qualitative metasynthesis for mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 47(4), 318–337. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.47.4.0318
  • Trouche, L. (2005). An instrumental approach to mathematics learning in symbolic calculator environments. In D. Guin, K. Ruthven, & L. Trouche (Eds.), The didactical challenge of symbolic calculators (pp. 137-162). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-23435-7_7
  • Vollstedt, M., & Rezat, S. (2019). An introduction to grounded theory with a special focus on axial coding and the coding paradigm. In G. Kaiser & N. Presmeg (Eds.), Compendium for early career researchers in mathematics education (pp. 81-100). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15636-7_4
  • Yuliani R. E., Suryadi, D. & Dahlan, J. A. (2018). Hypothetical learning trajectory to anticipate mathematics anxiety in algebra learning based on the perspective of didactical situation theory. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1013, 012137. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1013/1/012137

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.