Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of computer-assisted instruction [CAI], incorporating virtual reality [VR], on the academic achievement of 6th-grade students in Science courses. The research employed a quasi-experimental design with a pre-test and post-test control group. Lessons in both experimental and control groups were conducted according to the 5E instructional model. While the experimental group utilized CAI, including VR, the control group followed traditional teaching methods. The study involved 52 students at a public school in the eastern region of Türkiye. A researcher-developed achievement test on the Respiratory System was used as the primary data collection tool. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, dependent and independent t-tests, and the Mann-Whitney U test. Findings revealed that CAI significantly improved students’ academic achievement in Science, whereas gender did not affect performance outcomes. In the experimental group, there was no significant difference in achievement between students with or without personal computers. However, unexpectedly, students in the control group with personal computers outperformed those without. The study highlights the effectiveness of CAI, including VR, in enhancing academic performance and underscores the importance of equitable access to technological resources. These findings have implications for education policymakers, teachers, and parents aiming to improve Science education quality and promote equal learning opportunities through technological integration.  

Keywords

References

• Ainsworth, S., & VanLabeke, N. (2004). Multiple forms of dynamic representation. Learning and Instruction, 14(3), 241–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2004.06.002
• Akanbi, A. O., Omosewo, E. O., & Ilorin, B. O. N. (2018). Teachers’ characteristics and availability of laboratory as predictors of senior school students’ performance in physics in Ilorin, Nigeria. Journal of Teacher Education and Educators, 7(1), 43–55.
• Alegre, C. C. (2012). Computer-aided instructional tool in linear equation in two variables [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Notre Dame of Marbel University, Koronadal City.
• Ballone Duran, L., & Duran, E. (2004). The 5E instructional model: A learning cycle approach for inquiry-based science teaching. Science Education Review, 3(2), 49–58.
• Bunce, D. M., & Gabel, D. (2002). Differential effects on the achievement of males and females of teaching the particulate nature of chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(10), 911–927. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10056
• Busari, O. O., Ernest, S. B., & Ugwuanyi, P. N. (2016). Effect of computer-assisted instruction (CAI) on senior secondary students’ achievement in chemical reaction and equilibrium in Egbeda Local Government Area of Oyo State. International Journal of Secondary Education, 4(4), 39–43. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsedu.20160404.11
• Bybee, R. W., Taylor, J. A., Gardner, A., Scotter, P., Van Powell, J. C., Westbrook, A., & Landes, N. (2006). The BSCS 5E instructional model: Origins, effectiveness, and applications. Colorado Springs.
• Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (2015). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Ravenio Books.
• Carvalho, G. S., Silva, R., & Clément, P. (2007). Historical analysis of Portuguese primary school textbooks (1920–2005) on the topic of digestion. International Journal of Science Education, 29, 173–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600739340
• Christmann, E. P., & Badgett, J. L. (2000). The comparative effectiveness of CAI on collegiate academic performance. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 11, 91–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02940892
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203771587
• Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2002). Research methods in education. Routledge.
• Daşdemir, İ. (2016). The effect of the 5E instructional model enriched with cooperative learning and animations on seventh-grade students’ academic achievement and scientific attitudes. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 9(1), 21–38.
• Demircioğlu, H., & Geban, Ö. (1996). Comparison of computer-aided instruction and traditional problem-solving activities in terms of course success in science education. Hacettepe University Faculty of Education Journal, 12(12), 183–185.
• Demirer, A. (2006). A research on the effects of students' success computer assisted to science teaching six to eight grades of primary schools (in Sehit Namik Tumer Primary School sample) (Publication no. 206630) [Master’s thesis, Dicle University]. Council of Higher Education Thesis Center.
• Dönmez-Usta, N., & Ültay, N. (2022). Augmented reality and animation supported-STEM activities in grades K-12: Water treatment. Journal of Science Learning, 5, 439–451. https://doi.org/10.17509/jsl.v5i3.43546
• Ekundayo, S. K. (2022). Effects of computer-assisted instruction (CAI) on students’ academic achievement in chemistry among boys and girls in public secondary schools in Ondo State, Nigeria. British Journal of Education, 10(2), 31–41. https://doi.org/10.37745/bje/vol10.no1.pp31-41
• Güven, G., & Sülün, Y. (2012). The effects of computer-aided instruction on academic success and students' attitudes towards the course in 8th grade science and technology course. Turkish Journal of Science Education, 9(1), 68–79.
• Güvercin, Z. (2010). Effects of using simulation-aided software in physics lessons on students? academic performance and attitudes and on permanence (Publication no. 292849) [Master’s thesis, Çukurova University]. Council of Higher Education Thesis Center.
• Harrison, A. G., & Treagust, D. F. (2006). The particulate nature of matter: Challenges in understanding the submicroscopic world. In J. K. Gilbert, O. De Jong, R. Justi, D. F. Treagust, & J. H. Van Driel (Eds.), Chemical education: Towards research-based practice (pp. 189–212). Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47977-x_9
• Ibáñez, M. B., Di Serio, Á., Villarán, D., & Kloos, C. D. (2014). Experimenting with electromagnetism using augmented reality: Impact on flow student experience and educational effectiveness. Computers & Education, 71, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.09.004
• Jacek, L. L. (1997). Gender differences in learning physical science concepts: Does computer animation help equalize them? [Unpublished master's thesis]. Oregon State University, Oregon.
• Kahraman, Ö. (2007). Effect of the computer assisted instruction on student’s attitude and achievement on thephysics topic of the 7th grade science lesson (Publication no. 179459) [Master’s thesis, Pamukkale University]. Council of Higher Education Thesis Center.
• Kılıç, Y., & Haşıloğlu, M. A. (2017). The effect of socioeconomic status on student success (7th grade Turkish and science courses sample). Van Yüzüncü Yıl University Faculty of Education Journal, 14(1), 1025–1049.
• King, B. M., Rosopa, P. J., & Minium, E. W. (2018). Statistical reasoning in the behavioral sciences. John Wiley & Sons.
• Makransky, G., Petersen, G. B., & Klingenberg, S. (2020). Can an immersive virtual reality simulation increase students’ interest and career aspirations in science? British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(6), 2079–2097. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12954
• Moore, T., & Harrison, A. (2004). Floating and sinking: Everyday science in middle school [Paper presentation]. Annual Conference of the Australian Association for Research in Education, Melbourne.
• Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory. McGraw-Hill.
• Parker, J., & Heywood, D. (1998). The earth and beyond: Developing primary teachers’ understanding of basic astronomical events. International Journal of Science Education, 20(5), 503–520. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069980200502
• Pettersson, A. J., Danielsson, K., & Rundgren, C. J. (2020). ‘Traveling nutrients’: How students use metaphorical language to describe digestion and nutritional uptake. International Journal of Science Education, 42(8), 1281–1301. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1767231
• Rieber, L. P. (1990). Using computer animated graphics in science instruction with children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 135–140. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.135
• Rosali, L. J. D. (2020). Effect of computer-assisted instruction (CAI) on the academic achievement in secondary physics. Open Access Library Journal, 7, e6319. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1106319
• Rossoni, M., Spadoni, E., Carulli, M., Barone, C., Colombo, G., & Bordegoni, M. (2024). Virtual reality in education to enable active learning and hands-on experience. Computer-Aided Design and Applications, 21(2), 258-269. https://doi.org/10.14733/cadaps.2024.258-269
• Sawilowsky, S. S. (2009). New effect size rules of thumb. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 8, 597-599. https://doi.org/10.22237/jmasm/1257035100
• Shen, C. H. (1997). The effects of gender and cooperative learning with CAI on college students’ computer science achievement and attitudes toward computers. Florida Institute of Technology.
• Suleman, Q., Hussain, I., Din, M. N. U., & Iqbal, K. (2017). Effects of computer-assisted instruction (CAI) on students’ academic achievement in physics at secondary level. Computer Engineering and Intelligent Systems, 8(7), 9-17.
• Şeker, R., & Kartal, T. (2017). The effect of computer-aided instruction on student achievement in science education. Turkish Journal of Education, 6(1), 17-29. https://doi.org/10.19128/turje.279699
• Tabassum, R., & Farooq, R. A. (2011). Effect of computer assisted instruction (CAI) on secondary school students' achievement in science. Language in India, 11(6), 271–278.
• Tekkaya, C. (2003). Remediating high school students’ misconceptions concerning diffusion and osmosis through concept mapping and conceptual change text. Research in Science Technological Education, 21(1), 165-171. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635140308340
• Teplá, M., Teplý, P., & Šmejkal, P. (2022). Influence of 3D models and animations on students in natural subjects. International Journal of STEM Education, 9(1), 65. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-022-00382-8
• Ugwuanyi, C. S., Nduji, C. C., Gana, C. S., Nwajiuba, C. A., Ene, C. U., Okeke, A. O., Eseadi, C., Okeke, C. F. (2019). Effectiveness of flipped classroom instructional technology model in enhancing students’ achievement in physics. International Journal of u- and e- Service, Science and Technology, 12(4), 37-46.
• Wong, M., Castro-Alonso, J. C., Ayres, P., & Paas, F. (2018). Investigating gender and spatial measurements in instructional animation research. Computers in Human Behavior, 89, 446–456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.02.017
• Yalçın, M., & Çelikler, D. (2011). The effect of computer-assisted applications in the teaching of matter and heat subject. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 11(42), 273–293.
• Yavuz, S., & Akçay, M. (2017). Investigation of the effects of computer-aided instruction and laboratory-aided instruction on students' course achievement and attitudes towards the course. Karaelmas Journal of Educational Sciences, 5, 39–48.
• Zhang, W., & Wang, Z. (2021). Theory and practice of VR/AR in K-12 science education—a systematic review. Sustainability, 13(22), 12646. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212646
• Akbulut, Y., Saykılı, A., Öztürk, A., & Bozkurt, A. (2023). What if it’s all an illusion? To what extent can we rely on self-reported data in open, online, and distance education systems?. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 24(3), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v24i3.7321

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.