Abstract

The Industrial Revolution 4.0 necessitates the integration of digital technology into education, which emphasizes the importance of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge [TPACK] for teachers. This research presents information related to trend analysis, which focuses on TPACK studies in science learning. Nevertheless, it also provides information on writer productivity based on Lotka Law and journal distribution patterns based on Bradford's Law, which has yet to be discussed in previous articles. This study uses bibliometric analysis to examine the research trends of TPACK in science education from 2013 to 2023, using data from Scopus and tools such as bibliometric packages R and VosViewer. Findings indicate a growing interest in TPACK, with increasing annual publications, significant contributions from authors such as Namdar and Huwer, and high-impact journals such as the Journal of Research in Science Teaching. In addition, this article presents the author's productivity based on Lotka's Law. Key themes include integrating technology in teaching practices and the role of TPACK in improving science education. This analysis highlights influential articles and authors, offers insights into the evolution and impact of TPACK research, and guides future studies in this critical area of education.

Keywords

References

• Agyei, D. D., & Voogt, J. M. (2015). Preservice teachers' TPACK competencies for spreadsheet integration: Insights from a mathematics-specific instructional technology course. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 24(5), 605–625. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2015.1096822
• Aktaş, İ., & Özmen, H. (2020). Investigating the impact of TPACK development course on preservice science teachers' performances. Asia Pacific Education Review, 21(4), 667–682. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-020-09653-x
• Akyuz, D. (2018). Measuring technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) through performance assessment. Computers & Education, 125, 212–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.012
• Amiruddin, M. Z. Bin, Prahani, B. K., Suprapto, N., Suliyanah, S., & Samsudin, A. (2023). Find out publications for decade in local wisdom: contribute to education and physics education. Berkala Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika, 11(3), 382–401. https://doi.org/10.20527/bipf.v11i3.16715
• Angeli, C., Valanides, N., & Christodoulou, A. (2016). Theoretical considerations of technological pedagogical content knowledge. In M. C. Herring, M. J. Koehler, & P. Mishra (Eds.), Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) for educators (pp. 11–32). Routledge.
• Appleton, K. (2013). Science pedagogical content knowledge and elementary school teachers. In K. Appleton (Ed.), Elementary science teacher education (pp. 31-54). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315045443
• Baas, J., Schotten, M., Plume, A., Côté, G., & Karimi, R. (2020). Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(1), 377–386. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00019
• Bada, S. O., & Olusegun, S. (2015). Constructivism learning theory: A paradigm for teaching and learning. Journal of Research & Method in Education, 5(6), 66-70.
• Ball, R., & Tunger, D. (2006). Science indicators revisited–Science Citation Index versus SCOPUS: A bibliometric comparison of both citation databases. Information Services & Use, 26(4), 293–301. https://doi.org/10.3233/ISU-2006-26404
• Baran, E., & Uygun, E. (2016). Putting technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge (TPACK) in action: An integrated TPACK-design-based learning (DBL) approach. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 32(2), 2551. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.2551
• Bayram‐Jacobs, D., Henze, I., Evagorou, M., Shwartz, Y., Aschim, E. L., Alcaraz‐Dominguez, S., & Dagan, E. (2019). Science teachers' pedagogical content knowledge development during enactment of socioscientific curriculum materials. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 56(9), 1207-1233. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21550
• Bornmann, L., & Daniel, H. (2008). What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior. Journal of Documentation, 64(1), 45–80. https://doi.org/10.1108/00220410810844150
• Bornmann, L., Schier, H., Marx, W., & Daniel, H.-D. (2012). What factors determine citation counts of publications in chemistry besides their quality? Journal of Informetrics, 6(1), 11–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2011.08.004
• Bradford, S. C. (1934). Sources of information on specific subjects. Engineering, 137, 85-86.
• Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H. L., & Tsai, C.-C. (2013). A review of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 16(2), 31–51.
• Chavarro, D., Ràfols, I., & Tang, P. (2018). To what extent is inclusion in the Web of Science an indicator of journal ‘quality’? Research Evaluation, 27(2), 106–118. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvy001
• Chen, C. (2017). Science mapping: a systematic review of the literature. Journal of Data and Information Science, 2(2), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1515/jdis-2017-0006
• Dalal, M., Archambault, L., & Shelton, C. (2017). Professional development for international teachers: Examining TPACK and technology integration decision making. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 49(3–4), 117–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2017.1314780
• Dewi, N. R., Rusilowati, A., Saptono, S., Haryani, S., Wiyanto, W., Ridlo, S., Listiaji, P., & Atunnisa, R. (2021). Technological, pedagogical, content knowledge (TPACK) research trends: A systematic literature review of publications between 2010-2020. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 18(4), 589–604. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2021.92
• Ejaz, H., Zeeshan, H. M., Ahmad, F., Bukhari, S. N. A., Anwar, N., Alanazi, A., Sadiq, A., Junaid, K., Atif, M., & Abosalif, K. O. A. (2022). Bibliometric analysis of publications on the omicron variant from 2020 to 2022 in the Scopus database using R and VOSviewer. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(19), 12407. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912407
• Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2010.10782551
• Gaviria-Marin, M., Merigo, J. M., & Popa, S. (2018). Twenty years of the Journal of Knowledge Management: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Knowledge Management, 22(8), 1655–1687. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-10-2017-0497
• Gerstner, K., Moreno‐Mateos, D., Gurevitch, J., Beckmann, M., Kambach, S., Jones, H. P., & Seppelt, R. (2017). Will your paper be used in a meta‐analysis? Make the reach of your research broader and longer lasting. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 8(6), 777–784. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12758
• Gess-Newsome, J., Taylor, J. A., Carlson, J., Gardner, A. L., Wilson, C. D., & Stuhlsatz, M. A. (2019). Teacher pedagogical content knowledge, practice, and student achievement. International Journal of Science Education, 41(7), 944-963. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1265158
• Ghazavi, R., Taheri, B., & Ashrafi-rizi, H. (2019). Article quality indicator: Proposing a new indicator for measuring article quality in scopus and web of science. Journal of Scientometric Research, 8(1), 9–17. https://doi.org/10.5530/jscires.8.1.2
• Glowatz, M., & O'Brien, O. (2017). Academic engagement and technology: revisiting the technological, pedagogical and content knowledge framework (TPACK) in higher education (HE)--the academics' perspectives. iafor Journal of Education, 5, 133-159. https://doi.org/10.22492/ije.5.si.06
• González-Pérez, L. I., & Ramírez-Montoya, M. S. (2022). Components of education 4.0 in 21st century skills frameworks: systematic review. Sustainability, 14(3), 1493. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031493
• Graham, C. R., Borup, J., & Smith, N. B. (2012). Using TPACK as a framework to understand teacher candidates’ technology integration decisions. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28(6), 530–546. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00472.x
• Harris, J., Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2009). Teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge and learning activity types: Curriculum-based technology integration reframed. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41(4), 393–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2009.10782536
• Hofer, B. K., & Pintrich, P. R. (1997). The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of educational research, 67(1), 88-140. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543067001088
• Hughes, J. (2005). The role of teacher knowledge and learning experiences in forming technology-integrated pedagogy. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13(2), 277–302.
• Hunt, G. E., Cleary, M., & Walter, G. (2010). Psychiatry and the Hirsch h-index: The relationship between journal impact factors and accrued citations. Harvard Review of Psychiatry, 18(4), 207–219. https://doi.org/10.3109/10673229.2010.493742
• Jimoyiannis, A. (2010). Designing and implementing an integrated technological pedagogical science knowledge framework for science teachers professional development. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1259–1269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.05.022
• Kind, V., & Chan, K. K. (2019). Resolving the amalgam: connecting pedagogical content knowledge, content knowledge and pedagogical knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, 41(7), 964-978. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1584931
• Klavans, R., & Boyack, K. W. (2017). Research portfolio analysis and topic prominence. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 1158–1174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.10.002
• Kleickmann, T., Richter, D., Kunter, M., Elsner, J., Besser, M., Krauss, S., & Baumert, J. (2013). Teachers’ content knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge: The role of structural differences in teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(1), 90-106. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487112460398
• Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., Akcaoglu, M., & Rosenberg, J. M. (2013). The technological pedagogical content knowledge framework for teachers and teacher educators. Commonwealth Educational Media Centre for Asia.
• Koehler, M., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60–70.
• Koltun, V., & Hafner, D. (2021). The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation. PLoS One, 16(6), e0253397. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253397
• Lachner, A., Backfisch, I., & Stürmer, K. (2019). A test-based approach of modeling and measuring technological pedagogical knowledge. Computers & Education, 142, 103645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103645
• Lee, H.-Y., Chung, C.-Y., & Wei, G. (2022). Research on technological pedagogical and content knowledge: A bibliometric analysis from 2011 to 2020. Frontiers in Education, 7, 765233. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.765233
• Lightfoot, H., Baines, T., & Smart, P. (2013). The servitization of manufacturing: A systematic literature review of interdependent trends. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 33(11/12), 1408–1434. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-07-2010-0196
• Lin, T.-C., Tsai, C.-C., Chai, C. S., & Lee, M.-H. (2013). Identifying science teachers’ perceptions of technological pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK). Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22, 325–336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-012-9396-6
• Lotka, A. J. (1926). The frequency distribution of scientific productivity. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, 16(12), 317–323.
• Lupton, R. C., & Allwood, J. M. (2017). Hybrid Sankey diagrams: Visual analysis of multidimensional data for understanding resource use. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 124, 141–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.05.002
• Maeng, J. L., Mulvey, B. K., Smetana, L. K., & Bell, R. L. (2013). Preservice teachers’ TPACK: Using technology to support inquiry instruction. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22, 838–857. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-013-9434-z
• Mai, M. Y., & Hamzah, M. (2017). Primary science teachers’ perceptions of technological pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK) in Malaysia. European Journal of Social Science Education and Research, 4(1), 12–29.
• Marlina, M., Rahim, A., Ria, R. R. P., & Hadi, H. S. (2023). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Chemistry Education: A Review and Bibliometric Analysis Using VOSviewer and RStudio Applications. Moroccan Journal of Chemistry, 11(3), 11–13. https://doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.13.03.19
• McDaniels, M., Pfund, C., & Barnicle, K. (2016). Creating dynamic learning communities in synchronous online courses: One approach from the Center for the Integration of Research, Teaching and Learning (CIRTL). Online Learning, 20(1), 110–129. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v20i1.518
• Meller, L. L., Vasudev, M., Bui, A. T., Wang, J., Kuan, E. C., Tjoa, T., & Haidar, Y. M. (2023). Identifying core journals in otolaryngology: a bibliometric analysis. The Laryngoscope, 133(12), 3346-3352. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.30709
• Meyer, M. (2000). Does science push technology? Patents citing scientific literature. Research Policy, 29(3), 409–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00040-2
• Mirtl, M., Borer, E. T., Djukic, I., Forsius, M., Haubold, H., Hugo, W., Jourdan, J., Lindenmayer, D., McDowell, W. H., & Muraoka, H. (2018). Genesis, goals and achievements of long-term ecological research at the global scale: a critical review of ILTER and future directions. Science of the Total Environment, 626, 1439–1462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.001
• Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
• Mouza, C., Karchmer-Klein, R., Nandakumar, R., Ozden, S. Y., & Hu, L. (2014). Investigating the impact of an integrated approach to the development of preservice teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Computers & Education, 71, 206–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.09.020
• Muhlis, M., Kartono, K., & Kuswardono, S. (2023). Bibliometric analysis: research trends in the development of the TPACK instrument in the 2019–2023 Period. Journal of Research and Educational Research Evaluation, 12(2), 113–124.
• Nilsson, P. (2008). Teaching for understanding: The complex nature of pedagogical content knowledge in preservice education. International Journal of Science Education, 30(10), 1281-1299. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802186993
• Nilsson, P., & Van Driel, J. (2011). How will we understand what we teach?-Primary student teachers’ perceptions of their development of knowledge and attitudes towards physics. Research in Science Education, 41, 541-560. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-010-9179-0
• Osareh, F., & Mostafavi, E. (2011). Lotka’s Law and authorship distribution in computer science using Web of Science (WoS) during 1986–2009. Collnet Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management, 5(2), 171-183. https://doi.org/10.1080/09737766.2011.10700911
• Prahani, B. K., Bin Amiruddin, M. Z., Jatmiko, B., Suprapto, N., & Amelia, T. (2022). Top 100 Cited publications for the last thirty years in digital learning and mobile learning. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 16(8). https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v16i08.29803
• Pranckutė, R. (2021). Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The titans of bibliographic information in today’s academic world. Publications, 9(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications9010012
• Putri, A. H., Robandi, B., Samsudin, A., & Suhandi, A. (2022). Science education research within TPACK framework at a glance: a bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science, 6(3), 458–476. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijtes.404
• Riehmann, P., Hanfler, M., & Froehlich, B. (2005). Interactive sankey diagrams. In J. Stasko & m. Ward (Eds.), IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization, 2005 (pp. 233–240). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/INFVIS.2005.1532152
• Rodríguez Moreno, J., Agreda Montoro, M., & Ortiz Colon, A. M. (2019). Changes in teacher training within the TPACK model framework: A systematic review. Sustainability, 11(7), 1870. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11071870
• Sahu, A., & Jena, P. (2022). Lotka’s law and author productivity pattern of research in law discipline. Collection and Curation, 41(2), 62-73. https://doi.org/10.1108/CC-04-2021-0012
• Santos, J. M., & Castro, R. D. R. (2021). Technological Pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) in action: Application of learning in the classroom by preservice teachers (PST). Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 3(1), 100110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2021.100110
• Schmidt, D. A., Baran, E., Thompson, A. D., Mishra, P., Koehler, M. J., & Shin, T. S. (2009). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) the development and validation of an assessment instrument for preservice teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(2), 123–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2009.10782544
• Schneider, R. M., & Plasman, K. (2011). Science teacher learning progressions: A review of science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge development. Review of educational research, 81(4), 530-565. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654311423382
• Seglen, P. O. (1997). Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. Bmj, 314(7079), 497. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.314.7079.497
• Serenko, A., & Dumay, J. (2015). Citation classics published in knowledge management journals. Part I: articles and their characteristics. Journal of Knowledge Management, 19(2), 401-431. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-06-2014-0220
• Shafie, H., Majid, F. A., & Ismail, I. S. (2019). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) in teaching 21st century skills in the 21st century classroom. Asian Journal of University Education, 15(3), 24–33. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v15i3.7818
• Shenton, A. K., & Hay-Gibson, N. V. (2009). Bradford's Law and its relevance to researchers. Education for Information, 27(4), 217-230. https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-2009-0882
• Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
• Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004
• Simangunsong, M. F., Waspada, I., Rasto, R., Muhammad, I., Triansyah, F. A., & Gunawan, A. (2024). The impact of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) on learning outcomes: a bibliometric review. Jurnal EDUCATIO: Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 9(2), 1098–1107. https://doi.org/10.29210/1202323188
• So, H.-J., & Kim, B. (2009). Learning about problem based learning: Student teachers integrating technology, pedagogy and content knowledge. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(1), 1183. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1183
• Sood, S. K., Kumar, N., & Saini, M. (2021). Scientometric analysis of literature on distributed vehicular networks: VOSViewer visualization techniques. Artificial Intelligence Review, 54, 6309–6341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-021-09980-4
• Sudhier, K. P. (2013). Lotka's Law and pattern of author productivity in the area of physics research. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 33(6), 457–464. https://doi.org/10.14429/djlit.33.5477
• Suprapto, N., Sukarmin, S., Puspitawati, R. P., Erman, E., Savitri, D., Ku, C.-H., & Mubarok, H. (2021). Research Trend on TPACK through Bibliometric Analysis (2015-2019). International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 10(4), 1375–1385. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v10i4.22062
• Tahamtan, I., Safipour Afshar, A., & Ahamdzadeh, K. (2016). Factors affecting number of citations: a comprehensive review of the literature. Scientometrics, 107, 1195–1225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1889-2
• Tan, C. N.-L. (2016). Enhancing knowledge sharing and research collaboration among academics: the role of knowledge management. Higher Education, 71, 525–556. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-015-9922-6
• Tanak, A. (2020). Designing TPACK-based course for preparing student teachers to teach science with technological pedagogical content knowledge. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 41(1), 53–59.
• Tauxe, L., Shaar, R., Jonestrask, L., Swanson‐Hysell, N. L., Minnett, R., Koppers, A. A. P., Constable, C. G., Jarboe, N., Gaastra, K., & Fairchild, L. (2016). PmagPy: Software package for paleomagnetic data analysis and a bridge to the Magnetics Information Consortium (MagIC) Database. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 17(6), 2450–2463. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GC006307
• Tondeur, J., Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Baran, E. (2020). Enhancing preservice teachers' technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): A mixed-method study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(1), 319–343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09692-1
• Trajtenberg, M. (1990). A penny for your quotes: patent citations and the value of innovations. The Rand Journal of Economics, 21(1), 172–187. https://doi.org/10.2307/2555502
• Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2017). Citation-based clustering of publications using CitNetExplorer and VOSviewer. Scientometrics, 111, 1053–1070. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2300-7
• Van Eck, N., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
• Wagner, C. S., Roessner, J. D., Bobb, K., Klein, J. T., Boyack, K. W., Keyton, J., Rafols, I., & Börner, K. (2011). Approaches to understanding and measuring interdisciplinary scientific research (IDR): A review of the literature. Journal of Informetrics, 5(1), 14–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.06.004
• Wang, A. Y. (2022). Understanding levels of technology integration: A TPACK scale for EFL teachers to promote 21st-century learning. Education and Information Technologies, 27(7), 9935–9952. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11033-4
• Xu, F., Liu, W., & Mingers, J. (2015). New journal classification methods based on the global h-index. Information Processing & Management, 51(2), 50–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2014.10.011
• Yang, D.-C., & Sianturi, I. A. J. (2021). Sixth grade students’ performance, misconception, and confidence on a three-tier number sense test. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 19(2), 355–375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10051-3
• Yang, K., & Thoo, A. C. (2023). Visualising the knowledge domain of reverse logistics and sustainability performance: scientometric mapping based on VOSviewer and CiteSpace. Sustainability, 15(2), 1105. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15021105
• Yates, T. B., & Marek, E. A. (2014). Teachers teaching misconceptions: A study of factors contributing to high school biology students’ acquisition of biological evolution-related misconceptions. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 7, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12052-014-0007-2
• Yeh, Y., Hsu, Y., Wu, H., Hwang, F., & Lin, T. (2014). Developing and validating technological pedagogical content knowledge‐practical (TPACK‐practical) through the D elphi survey technique. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(4), 707–722. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12078
• Zou, D., Huang, X., Kohnke, L., Chen, X., Cheng, G., & Xie, H. (2022). A bibliometric analysis of the trends and research topics of empirical research on TPACK. Education and Information Technologies, 27(8), 10585–10609. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10991-z

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.