Abstract

In the new context of comprehensively deepening education reform and school management oriented towards distributed leadership, analyzing the influencing factors of teachers' professional development to improve teachers' professional development is of great significance in strengthening the construction of the teaching force and promoting the high-quality development of education. Based on the theory of distributed leadership, this study used the Distributed Leadership Scale, the Teacher Professional Learning Community Scale, and the Teacher Professional Development Scale. A convenient sampling method was used to distribute questionnaires to 650 teachers in 33 primary schools in Hebei Province, China, and 593 valid questionnaires were collected. The structural equation model was employed to explore the relationships among distributed leadership, teacher professional learning communities, and teachers' professional development. The research results indicate that both distributed leadership and teacher professional learning communities can positively predict teacher professional development, and distributed leadership can positively predict teacher professional learning communities; The teacher professional learning community plays a completely mediating role between distributed leadership and teacher professional development.

Keywords

References

• Amzat, I. H., Yanti, P. G., & Suswandari, S. (2022). Estimating the effect of principal instructional and distributed leadership on professional development of teachers in Jakarta, Indonesia. SAGE Open, 12(3), https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221109585
• Anthony, A. B., Gimbert, B. G., Luke, J. B., & Hurt, M. H. (2019). Distributed leadership in context: Teacher leaders’ contributions to novice teacher induction. Journal of School Leadership, 29(1), 54–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052684618825086
• Aubrey, C., Godfrey, R., & Harris, A. (2013). How do they manage? An investigation of early childhood leadership. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 41(1), 5-29. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143212462702
• Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
• Bolam, R., McMahon, A., Stoll, L., Thomas, S., Wallace, M., Greenwood, A., Hawkey, K., Ingram, M., Atkinson, A., & Smith, M. (2005). Creating and sustaining effective professional learning communities (Publication no. 637). Department for Education and Skills, University of Bristol.
• Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structure equations with latent variables. John Wiley.
• Bowman, M. A., Vongkulluksn, V. W., Jiang, Z., & Xie, K. (2022). Teachers’ exposure to professional development and the quality of their instructional technology use: The mediating role of teachers’ value and ability beliefs. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 54(2), 188-204. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2020.1830895
• Bryk, A. S., Camburn, E., & Louis, K. S. (1999). Professional community in Chicago elementary schools: Facilitating factors and organizational consequences. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35(5), 751-781. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013161X99355004
• Choi, S., & Mao, X. (2021). Teacher autonomy for improving teacher self-efficacy in multicultural classrooms: A cross-national study of professional development in multicultural education. International Journal of Educational Research, 105, 101711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101711
• Colmer, K. (2017). Collaborative professional learning: Contributing to the growth of leadership, professional identity and professionalism. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 25(3), 436-449. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2017.1308167
• Day, C., & Sammons, P. (2013). Successful leadership: A review of the international literature. CfBT Education Trust.
• Doll, W. J., Xia, W., & Torkzadeh, G. (1994). A Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the End-User Computing Satisfaction Instrument. MIS Quarterly, 12(2), 259-274.
• Elmore, R. F. (2000). Building a new structure for school leadership. Albert Shanker Institute.
• Gao, Q. Y. (2020). A Study on the job satisfaction of elementary school teachers - a case study of Shijiazhuang area [Unpublished master's thesis]. Hebei Normal University.
• Gong, J. (2023). The impact of distributed leadership on teachers' job satisfaction: The mediating roles of teacher collaboration and teacher self-efficacy - Based on the TALIS 2018 Shanghai teacher data. Global Education Outlook, 5, 105-118.
• Gong, Y. L. (2018). A study on the relationship between elementary school principals' learning leadership, teachers' professional development, and learning-oriented schools [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Taipei Municipal University.
• Gore, J. M., Miller, A., Fray, L., Harris, J., & Prieto, E. (2021). Improving student achievement through professional development: Results from a randomised controlled trial of Quality Teaching Rounds. Teaching and Teacher Education, 101, 103297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103297
• Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998) .Multivariate data analysis. Prentice-Hall International.
• Hamzah, M. I. M., & Jamil, M. F. (2019). The Relationship of distributed leadership and professional learning community. Creative Education, 10(12), 2730-2741. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2019.1012199
• Hard, L., Press, F., & Gibson, M. (2013). ‘Doing’ social justice in early childhood: the potential of leadership. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 14(4), 324-334. https://doi.org/10.2304/ciec.2013.14.4.324
• Hargreaves, A. (2007). Sustainable professional learning communities. In L. Stoll, & K. S. Louis (Eds.), Professional learning communities: Divergence, depth and dilemmas (pp. 181-195). McGraw-Hill Education.
• Harris, A. (2007). Distributed leadership: Conceptual confusion and empirical reticence. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 10(3), 315-325. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603120701257313
• Hayes, A. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. Journal of Educational Measurement, 51(3), 335-337. https://doi.org/10.1111/jedm.12050
• Hebei Provincial Bureau of Statistics. (2022). Hebei statistical yearbook. Author. http://tjj.hebei.gov.cn/
• Heck, R. H., & Hallinger, P. (2009). Assessing the contribution of distributed leadership to school improvement and growth in math achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 46(3), 659-689. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831209340042
• Hermann, K. R. (2016). The principal’s role; Distributed leadership [Doctoral dissertation]. Old Dominion University. https://doi:10.25777/a1s9-1z37
• Hilel, A., & Ramírez-García, A. (2022). The relationship between professional environmental factors and teacher professional development in Israeli schools. Education Sciences, 12(4), 285. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12040285
• Joo, Y. H. (2020). The effects of distributed leadership on teacher professionalism: The case of Korean middle schools. International Journal of Educational Research, 99, 101500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2019.101500
• Klar, H. W., Huggins, K. S., Hammonds, H. L., & Buskey, F. C. (2016). Fostering the capacity for distributed leadership: A post-heroic approach to leading school improvement. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 19(2), 111-137. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2015.1005028
• Liu, Y., & Werblow, J. (2019). The operation of distributed leadership and the relationship with organizational commitment and job satisfaction of principals and teachers: A multi-level model and meta-analysis using the 2013 TALIS data. International Journal of Educational Research, 96, 41-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2019.05.005
• Liu, Y., Bellibaş, M. Ş., & Gümüş, S. (2021). The effect of instructional leadership and distributed leadership on teacher self-efficacy and job satisfaction: Mediating roles of supportive school culture and teacher collaboration. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 49(3), 430-453. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143220910438
• Liu, Y. Y. (2017). A study on the relationship between kindergarten principal's distributed leadership, teacher leadership, and teacher professional development: A case of the central Changhua and Taichung area [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. National Taichung University of Education.
• Lu, X., & Smith, R. (2021). Exploring the manifestation of distributed leadership in Chinese Higher Education. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 24, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2021.1956598
• MacCallum, R. C., & Hong, S. (1997). Power analysis in covariance structure modeling using GFI and AGFI. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 32, 193-210. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr3202_5
• Mawhinney, H. A. N. N. E., Haas, J. A. C. K. I. E., & Wood, C. A. R. O. L. Y. N. (2005). Teachers' collective efficacy beliefs in professional learning communities. Leading and Managing, 11(2), 12-45. https://doi.org/10.3316/aeipt.149313
• Meeuwen, P. V., Huijboom, F., Rusman, E., Vermeulen, M., & Imants, J. (2020). Towards a comprehensive and dynamic conceptual framework to research and enact professional learning communities in the context of secondary education. European journal of teacher education, 43(3), 405-427. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2019.1693993
• Meirink, J. A., Imants, J., Meijer, P. C., & Verloop, N. (2010). Teacher learning and collaboration in innovative teams. Cambridge Journal of Education, 40(2), 161-181. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2010.481256
• Ministry of Education. (2022). Strengthening the professional development system for teachers to cultivate great teachers in the new era of a strong country. Journal of Chinese Education, 9, 1-6.
• Moser, C. A., & Kalton, G. (2017). Survey methods in social investigation. Routledge.
• Mulaik, S. A., James, L. R., Altine, J. V., Bennett, N., Lind, S., & Stilwell, C. D. (1989). Evaluation of goodness-of-fit indices for structural equation models. Psychological Bulletin, 105(3), 430-445. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.105.3.430
• Nevitt, J., & Hancock, G. R. (2001). Performance of bootstrapping approaches to model test statistics and parameter standard error estimation in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 8(3), 353-377. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0803_2
• Nicholas, B., Avram, A., Chow, J., & Lupasco, S. (2018). Building a community of connected ELT professionals on Twitter. TESL Canada Journal, 35(2), 166-178. https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v35i2.1296
• OECD. (2020). TALIS 2018 results (Volume II): teachers and school leaders as valued professionals. Author. https://doi.org/10.1787/19cf08df-en
• Opfer, V. D., & Pedder, D. (2011). Conceptualizing teacher professional learning. Review of Educational Research, 81(3), 376-407. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654311413609
• Özer, N., & Beycioğlu, K. (2013). The development, validity and reliability study of distributed leadership scale. Elementary Education Online, 12(1), 7‐86.
• Poekert, P. E. (2016). Teacher leadership and professional development: Examining links between two concepts central to school improvement. Professional Development in Education, 38(2), 169–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2012.657824
• Prenger, R., Poortman, C. L., & Handelzalts, A. (2019). The effects of networked professional learning communities. Journal of Teacher Education, 70(5), 441-452. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487117753574
• Qiu X. Y., & Xiao J. H. (2019). A study on the correlation between high school teachers' teaching styles and teaching efficacy - with teacher professional development as the mediating variable and school organizational culture as the moderating variable. Contemporary Education Research Quarterly, 27(1), 39-78. https://doi.org/10.6151/CERQ.201903_27(1).0002
• Schmoker, M. (2005). No turning back: The ironclad case for professional learning communities. In R. DuFour, & R. DuFour (Eds.), On common ground: The power of professional learning communities (pp. 135-153). National Educational Service.
• Sebastian, J., Allensworth, E., & Huang, H. (2016). The role of teacher leadership in how principals influence classroom instruction and student learning. American Journal of Education, 123(1), 69-108. https://doi.org/10.1086/688169
• Spillane, J. P. (2005). Distributed leadership. The Educational Forum, 69(2), 143–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131720508984678
• Spillane, J., Halverson, R. & Diamond, J. (2004) Towards a theory of leadership practice: a distributed perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 31(1), 3-34. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022027032000106726
• Ullman, J. B. (2001). Structural equation modeling. In B. G. Tabachnick & L. S. Fidell (Eds.), Using multivariate statistics. Pearson Education.
• Van den Boom-Muilenburg, S. N., de Vries, S., van Veen, K., Poortman, C. L., & Schildkamp, K. (2021). Understanding sustainable professional learning communities by considering school leaders’ interpretations and educational beliefs. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 27(4), 934-961. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2021.1937705
• Vanblaere, B., & Devos, G. (2016). Relating school leadership to perceived professional learning community characteristics: A multilevel analysis. Teaching and Teacher Education, 57, 26-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.03.003
• Vangrieken, K., Meredith, C., Packer, T., & Kyndt, E. (2017). Teacher communities as a context for professional development: A systematic review. Teaching and Teacher Education, 61, 47-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.10.001
• Wahlstrom, K. L., & Louis, K. S. (2008). How teachers experience principal leadership: The roles of professional community, trust, efficacy, and shared responsibility. Educational administration quarterly, 44(4), 458-495. https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013161X08321502
• Wang, T. (2016). School leadership and professional learning community: Case study of two senior high schools in Northeast China. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 36(2), 202-216. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2016.1148849
• Wenger, E. (1999). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press.
• Wheaton, B. (1987). Assessment of fit in overidentified models with latent variables. Sociological Methods & Research, 16(1), 118-154. https://doi.org/10.1177/00491241870160010
• Widodo, H. P., & Allamnakhrah, A. (2020). The impact of a blended professional learning community on teacher educators’ professional identity: Towards sustainable teacher professional development. Journal of Education for Teaching, 46(3), 408-410. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2020.1761249
• Wu, M. L. (2010). Practical questionnaire statistical analysis: SPSS operations and applications. Chongqing University Press.
• Xiu, Q., Liu, P., Yao, H., & Liu, L. (2022). The relationship between distributed leadership and teacher commitment to change: the mediating roles of professional learning communities and job satisfaction. Asia Pacific Education Review, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-022-09747-8
• Zhao, Y. (2016). Distributed leadership: origin, content, and practice path. Shandong Social Sciences, 7, 166-171.
• Zheng, X., & Yin, H. B. (2015). Distributed leadership: concepts, practices, and prospects. Global Education Outlook, 2, 96-106.
• Zhou, H. & Long, L. R. (2004). Statistical testing and control methods for common method bias. Advances in Psychological Science, 12(6), 942-950.
• Zhu, G., & Zhu, L. B. (2022). James Spillane's distributed leadership theory in education: structural implications and future research directions. Foreign Education Research, 2, 17-37.

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.