Abstract

This study aims at determining the efficacy and motivational implications of word count tracking as a viable technique for improving writing output among Saudi EFL undergraduates. An intensive Writing Program was conducted at English Department Al-Majmaah University with two groups who were taught through two different approaches. The experimental group (n=23) took a writing session once a week (for six weeks) with word-count tracking strategy besides their regular credit hours writing classes, while the control group (n=22) was taught through conventional approach. The main hypothesis was that the experimental group will have higher mean score than the control group after the implementation of word-count tracking strategy. The difference between the mean score of pre-test and post-test of the experimental group and the control group was found statistically significant at p<.05. The experimental group, despite achieving lower mean score in the pre-test, made 48.51% improvement in the post-test, while the control group showed only 20.33 % output increase. Hence, the study deduced that the word-count tracking technique improved the writing fluency and motivation of students and should be implemented by the writing teachers. The researcher also administered a questionnaire at the end of the study to evaluate perception of the students toward this technique, the writing program and their overall motivational level after this program which showed that students had positive perception towards word-count and believed that it had enhanced their motivation as well as writing fluency.

Keywords

References

• Ababneh, I. (2017). Analysis of written English: The case of female university students in Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Social Science Studies, 5(4), 2264. https://doi.org/10.11114/ijsss.v5i4.2264
• AbuSeileek, A. F. (2006). The use of word processor for teaching writing to EFL learners in King Saud University. Journal of King Saud University, 19(2), 1-15.
• Al-Ahdal, A. A. M. H., & Mariam, A. (2021). English writing proficiency and apprehensions among Saudi college students: Facts and Remedies. TESOL International Journal, 16(1), 34-56.
• Aldosari, H. (2014). The entwined effects of attitude, motivation, and gender on EFL learning: a correlation study. Studies in Literature and Language, 8(1), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.3968/j.sll.1923156320140801.4183
• Alghizzi, T. M., & Deen, A. A. M. A. E. (2020). Enhancing Saudi EFL learners’ CAF in narrative writing through native speaker kids’ reading website. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 9(6), 67. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.9n.6p.67
• Al-Hajailan, T. (2003). Teaching English in Saudi Arabia. Aldar Alsawtia.
• Alharthi, S. (2021). From instructed writing to free-writing: A study of EFL learners. Sage Open, 11(1), 7112. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211007112
• Alisaari, J., & Heikkola, M. (2016). Increasing fluency in L2 writing with singing. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 6(2), 271-292. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2016.6.2.5
• Alitto, J., Malecki, C. K., Coyle, S., & Santuzzi, A. (2016). Examining the effects of adult and peer mediated goal setting and feedback interventions for writing: two studies. Journal of School Psychology, 56, 89–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2016.03.002
• Alkhairy, M. (2013). Saudi English-major undergraduates' academic writing problems: a taif university perspective. English Language Teaching, 6(6), 1-12.
• Al-Khasawneh, F. (2010). Writing for academic purposes: problems faced by Arab postgraduate students of the College of Business. ESP World, 9(2), 1-23.
• Al-Mahrooqi, R., & Denman, C. (2014). Issues in English Education in the Arab World. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
• Aloairdhi, N. (2019). Writing anxiety among Saudi female learners at some Saudi universities. English Language Teaching, 12(9), 55-65. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v12n9p55
• Al-Qahtani, M. F. (2013). Relationship between English language, learning strategies, attitudes, motivation, and students’ academic achievement. Education in Medicine Journal, 5(3), 19-29. https://doi.org/10.5959/eimj.v5i3.124
• Alrabai, F. (2014). Motivational practices in English as a foreign language classes in Saudi Arabia: Teachers beliefs and learner’s perceptions. Arab World English Journal, 5(1), 224-246.
• Al-Saleh, N. A. (2018). The impact of positive and corrective feedback via Showbie on Saudi students' English writing (Publication no. 215) [Master’s thesis, Imam Muhammad Ibn Saud Islamic University]. Arab World English Journal. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/th.215
• Ashraf, T. A. (2018). Teaching English as a foreign language in Saudi Arabia: Struggles and strategies. International Journal of English Language Education, 6(1), 133–154. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijele.v6i1.13148
• Bandhu, D., Mohan, M. M., Nittala, N. A. P., Jadhav, P., Bhadauria, A., & Saxena, K. K. (2024). Theories of motivation: A comprehensive analysis of human behavior drivers. Acta Psychologica, 244, 104177.
• Berninger, V. W., Rutberg, J. E., Abbott, R. D., Garcia, N., Anderson-Youngstrom, & M., Brooks, A., (2006). Tier 1 and Tier 2 early intervention for handwriting and composing. Journal of School Psychology, 44, 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2005.12.003
• Boynton, P., & Greenhalgh, T. (2004). Selecting, designing, and developing your questionnaire. BMJ, 328, 1312. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.328.7451.1312
• Che Mat, S. S., & Yunus, M. M. (2014). Attitudes and motivation towards learning English among FELDA school students. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 8(5), 1-8.
• Chenoweth, N. A., & Hayes, J. R. (2001). Fluency in writing: Generating text in L1 and L2. Written Communication, 18(1), 80–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088301018001004
• Chmarkh, M. (2021). ‘Writing to learn’ research: A synthesis of empirical studies (2004-2019). European Journal of Educational Research, 10(1), 85-96. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.10.1.85
• Codding, R., Lewandowski, L., & Eckert, T. (2005). Examining the efficacy of performance feedback and goal setting interventions in children with ADHD: A comparison of two methods of goal setting. Journal of Evidence-Based Practices for Schools, 6, 42-58.
• Cusumano, D. L. (2007). Is it working?: An overview of curriculum based measurement and its uses for assessing instructional, intervention, or program effectiveness. The Behavior Analyst Today, 8(1), 24–34. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0100099
• Deno, S. L. (1985). Curriculum-based measurement: The emerging alternative. Exceptional Children, 52, 219-232. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224669030370030801
• Deno, S. L. (2003). Developments in curriculum-based measurement. The Journal of Special Education, 37(3), 184-192. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224669030370030801
• Dhaif-Allah, A.S. (2005). An exploration of saudi students' integrative and instrumental motivation for learning English as a foreign language. Occasional Papers, CDELT, Ain-Shams University, 38, 57-96.
• Elbow, P. (1973). Writing without teachers. Oxford University Press.
• Elola, I. (2006). The complexity of revision in an intermediate-level Spanish language classroom and the creation of a foreign language revision model. DAI-A, 66(8), 28-68.
• Elyas, T., & Picard, M. (2018). A brief history of English and English teaching in Saudi Arabia. In C. Moskovsky & M. Picard (Eds.), English as a foreign language in Saudi Arabia: New insights into teaching and learning English (pp. 70–84). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315688466-3
• Eshghinejad, S. (2016). Retracted Article: EFL students’ attitudes toward learning English language: The case study of Kashan University students. Cogent Education, 3(1), 1236434. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2016.1236434
• Farooqi, S.H. (2024). Perception and practices of Saudi EFL learners towards self-motivated language learning (SMLL): A case study of undergraduate students at the English department of Al-Majmaah University, KSA. Migration Letters, 21(5), 871–892.
• Farrell, A., & McDougall, D. (2008). Self-monitoring of pace to improve math fluency of High school students with disabilities. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 1(2), 26–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03391725
• Fattah, S.F. (2015). The effectiveness of using Whatsapp messenger as one of mobile learning techniques to develop students' writing skills. Journal of Education and Practice, 6, 115-127.
• Ferris, D. R. (2014). Responding to student writing: Teachers’ philosophies and practices. Assessing Writing, 19, 6–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2013.09.00
• Figarola, P. M., Gunter, P. L., Reffel, J. M., Worth, S. R., Hummel, J., & Gerber, B. L. (2008). Effects of self-graphing and goal setting on the math fact fluency of students with disabilities. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 1(2), 36–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03391726
• Fontecha, A. F. & Gallego, M. T. (2012). The role of motivation and age in vocabulary knowledge. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 9, 39–62.
• Galegane, G., & Ntereke, B. B. (2022). Examining the effectiveness of the process-genre writing instructional framework in EAP writing course. Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology, 4(2), 112-130. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPSP.202217703
• Gawi, A. (2012). The effects of age factor on learning English: A case study of learning English in Saudi schools, Saudi Arabia. English Language Teaching, 5(1), 127–139. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v5n1p127
• Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (2009). Almost 30 years of writing research: Making sense of it all with The Wrath of Khan. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 24(2), 58-68
• Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007a). Writing next: Effective strategies to improve writing of adolescents in middle and high schools – A report to Carnegie Corporation of New York. Alliance for Excellent Education.
• Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007b). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for adolescent students. Journal of educational psychology, 99(3), 445. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.445
• Graham, S., Harris, K. R., & Troia, G. A. (1998). Writing and self-regulation: Cases from the self-regulated strategy development model. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulated learning: From teaching to self-reflective practice (pp. 20–41). Guilford Press.
• Gunter, P. L., Miller, K. A., & Venn, M. L. (2003). A case study of the effects of self-graphing reading performance data for a girl identified with emotional / behavioral disorders. Preventing School Failure, 48, 28-31. https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2003.10871076
• Hafiz, S., Omar, A., & Sher, K. (2018). Analysis of syntactic errors in English writing: a case study of jazan university preparatory year students. Journal of Education and Practice, 9, 113-120.
• Hansen, B. D., & Wills, H. P. (2014). The effects of goal setting, contingent reward, and instruction on writing skills. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 47, 171–175. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.92
• Haynes, J. (2007). Getting started with English language learners: How educators can meet the challenge. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
• Hier, B. O., & Eckert, T. L. (2014). Evaluating elementary-aged students’ abilities to generalize and maintain fluency gains of a performance feedback writing intervention. School Psychology Quarterly, 29(4), 488.
• Hughes, J. M., Foti, N. J., Krakauer, D. C., & Rockmore, D. N. (2012). Quantitative patterns of stylistic influence in the evolution of literature. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(20), 7682-7686. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1115407109
• Ismail, S. A. A. (2011). Exploring students' perceptions of ESL writing. English Language Teaching, 4(2), 73-83. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v4n2p73
• Javid, C. Z., & Al-Malki, E. A. (2018). Saudi University undergraduates’ beliefs about language learning long gender lines. International Journal of English Linguistics, 8(4), 39. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v8n4p39
• Kowal, I. (2014). Fluency in second language writing: A developmental perspective. Studia Linguistica Universitatis Iagellonicae Cracoviensis, 131, 229–246. https://doi.org/10.4467/20834624SL.14.013.2321
• Lagan, J. (2000). College writing skills. Longman.
• Lavik K. B. (2014). The effectiveness of a goal setting intervention that incorporates performance feedback, self-graphing, and reinforcement on improving the writing skills of high school students (Publication no. kent1395826954) [Doctoral dissertation, Kent State University]. Ohio Library and Information Network.
• Lee, B. J., & Al Khateeb, A. A. (2021). Analyzing writing fluency on smartphones by Saudi EFL students. Computers and Composition, 62, 102667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2021.102667
• Limpo, T., Parente, N., & Alves, R. A. (2018). Promoting handwriting fluency in
• fifth graders with slow handwriting: a single-subject design study. Reading and Writing Interdisciplinary Journal, 31, 1343–1366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-017-9814-5
• Listyani, (2018). Enhancing academic writing skills through “reading to learn” strategy. Arab World English Journal, 9(1), 268-280. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol9no1.19
• Locke, E.A., & Latham, G.P. (2013). New developments in goal setting and task performance. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203082744
• López-Escribano, C., Martín‐Babarro, J., & Pérez-López, R. (2022). Promoting Handwriting fluency for preschool and elementary-age students: meta-analysis and meta-synthesis of research from 2000 to 2020. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 841573. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.841573
• Mace, F. C., & Kratochwill, T. R. (1988). Self-monitoring. In J. C. Witt, S. W. Elliott, &
• F. M. Gresham (Eds.), Handbook of behavior therapy in education (pp. 277-324).
• Plenum.
• MacGowan-Gilhooly, A. (1991). Fluency first: Reversing the traditional ESL sequence. Journal of Basic Writing, 10, 73-87. https://doi.org/10.37514/JBW-J.1991.10.1.08
• Magulod, G. C. (2018). Use of innovative prewriting techniques in enhancing the writing performance and attitude of second year information technology students. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 6(2), 1-9.
• Manchón, R., & Roca de Larios, J. (2011). Writing to learn in FL contexts Exploring learners’ perceptions of the language learning potential of L2 writing. In R. M. Manchón (Ed.), Learning-to-write and writing-to-learn in an additional language (pp. 181-207). John Benjamins Publishing.
• Martens, B. K., Edward, J. D., Begeny, J. C., & VanDerHeyden, A. (2011). Behavioral approaches to education. In W. W. Fisher, H. S. Piazza, & H. S. Roane (Eds.), Handbook of applied behavior analysis (pp. 385–401). The Guilford Press.
• Martens, B. K., Witt, J. C., Elliott, S. N., & Darveaux, D. X. (1985). Teacher judgments concerning the acceptability of school-based interventions. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 16, 191-198. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7028.16.2.191
• McCarthy, S., & Ro, Y. (2011). Approaches to writing instruction. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 6, 273–295.
• McMullen, M.G. (2009). Using language learning strategies to improve the writing skills of Saudi EFL students: Will it really work? System, 37(3), 418-433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2009.05.001
• Mohammed, A. (2015). EFL effective factors: Anxiety and motivation and their effect on Saudi College student’s achievement. Arab World English Journal, 6, 201-218.
• Mustafa, R. F. (2012). Feedback on the feedback: Sociocultural interpretation of Saudi ESL learners’ opinions about writing feedback. English Language Teaching, 5(3), 3. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v5n3p3
• Nation, P. (2014). Developing fluency. In T. Muller, J. Adamson, P. S. Brown, & S. Herder (Eds.), Exploring EFL fluency in Asia (pp.11-25). Palgrave-Macmillan.
• O'Brien, S., Baugh, H., & Verneda, P. (2013).Effects of minimum word counts on writing tasks. Modern Psychological Studies, 19(1), 3.
• Onoue, T., Iguchi, Y., & Maruno, S. (2017). Effects of goal-setting and self-graphing on math fluency: Class-wide instruction in the third and fourth grades. Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology, 65(1), 132-144. https://doi.org/10.5926/jjep.65.132
• Petri, H. L. & Cofer, C. N. (2024). Motivation. Encyclopedia Britannica.
• Petrić, B., & Czárl, B. (2003). Validating a writing strategy questionnaire. System, 31(2), 187–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(03)00020-4
• Pichère, P., & Cadiat, A.-C. (2015). Maslow’s hierarchy of needs. Lemaitre.
• Pietriková, E. (2015). Audience response systems: Benefits & utilization. Acta Electrotechnica et Informatica, 15(4), 3–7. https://doi.org/10.15546/aeei-2015-0028
• Pour-Mohammadi, M., Zainol Abidin, M., & Cheong Lai, F. (2012). The effect of process writing practice on the writing quality of form one students: A Case Study. Asian Social Science, 8(3), 88-99.
• Raoofi, S., Miri, A., Gharibi, J. & Malaki, B. (2017). Assessing and validating a writing strategy scale for undergraduate students. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 8, 624. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0803.23
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
• Sakihama, H. (2005). Does a length limitation promote better expository writing? Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology, 53(1), 63-73. https://doi.org/10.5926/jjep1953.53.1_62
• Schmidt, R. (1992). Psychological mechanism underlying Second Language Fluency. – Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 14, 357–385. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100011189
• Skinner, B.F. (1953). Science and human behavior. Macmillan.
• Taherdoost, H. (2016). Validity and reliability of the research instrument; how to test the validation of a questionnaire/survey in a research (3205040). SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3205040
• Tahseldar, M. (2018). The impact of journal writing on cycle two EFL students writing achievement. International Journal of Science and Research, 7(5), 1774–1787. https://doi.org/10.21275/art20182913
• Tse, S., & Hui S. (2016). Chinese writing curriculum reforms in Hong Kong in recent years and their impact on teaching and learning. Reading & Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 29, 1013–1037. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9595-7
• Vroom, V.H., & Deci, E.L. (1993). Management and motivation. Penguin.
• Vu, T., Magis‐Weinberg, L., Jansen, B. R., Van Atteveldt, N., Janssen, T. W. P., Lee, N., Van Der Maas, H. L. J., Raijmakers, M. E. J., Sachisthal, M. S. M., & Meeter, M. (2021). Motivation-achievement cycles in learning: a literature review and research agenda. Educational Psychology Review, 34(1), 39–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09616-7
• Williams, J. A. (2001). Classroom conversations: Opportunities to learn for ESL students in mainstream classrooms. Reading Teacher, 54(8), 750-757.
• Wolfe-Quintero, K., Inagaki, S., & Kim, H.-Y. (1998). Second language development in writing: Measures of fluency, accuracy and complexity [Technical report]. University of Hawai'i Press.
• Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: a social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13-39). Academic Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50031-7
• Zohrabi, M. (2013). Mixed method research: Instruments, validity, reliability and reporting findings. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.3.2.254-262

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.