Fostering learner autonomy through explicit metacognitive strategy instruction: A study in the Omani EFL context
Surya S. Vellanki 1 * , Zahid K. Khan 1, Saadat Mond 1
More Detail
1 University of Technology and Applied Sciences, Nizwa, Oman
* Corresponding Author

Abstract

This research paper explores the effectiveness of Metacognitive Strategy Instruction [MSI] in enhancing the listening skills and autonomy of adult EFL learners in the advanced level of university preparatory studies in Oman. Utilizing a quasi-experimental design, the study involved an Experimental Group [EG] and a Control Group [CG], each comprising 24 students. The EG received MSI, while the CG did not, allowing for a comparative analysis of their listening performances and metacognitive strategy awareness. The study employed a mixed-method approach, incorporating both quantitative and qualitative data. Quantitative data, gathered through pretest and posttest along with the Metacognitive Awareness Listening Questionnaire, assessed the impact of MSI on students’ listening skills and metacognitive strategy awareness. Qualitative insights were derived from informal, semi-structured interviews with EG participants, focusing on their experiences and perceptions of MSI. Findings revealed that postintervention, the EG showed significant improvements in listening skills and metacognitive strategy awareness compared to the CG. Specifically, the EG demonstrated notable advancements in planning and evaluation, directed attention, person knowledge, and problem-solving skills. However, both groups continued to rely heavily on mental translation, indicating a persistent dependence on their native language. The study underscores the potential of MSI in fostering learner autonomy and enhancing listening competencies in the Omani EFL context. It advocates for the integration of metacognitive strategies into the language curriculum, specialized teacher training, and the provision of accessible learning resources. The findings particularly highlight the importance of MSI in promoting autonomous learning behaviors, such as planning, monitoring, and evaluating one's own learning process. By enhancing metacognitive strategy awareness, MSI empowers students to take charge of their language learning, thereby increasing their self-efficacy and autonomy. The research suggests that targeted MSI can significantly contribute to the development of L2 learner autonomy in listening. It also recommends further investigation into MSI's long-term effects on promoting autonomy in other language skills and fostering overall learner autonomy in various educational contexts.

Keywords

References

  • Ahmadian, M. J., & Hedayati, M. (2020). The effect of metacognitive strategy instruction on EFL learners’ listening comprehension ability. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 49(6), 1489-1506.
  • Al Balushi, A. (2017) The effect of using test-taking strategies in Omani grade 11 students’
  • performance in listening comprehension tests and their perceptions of these strategies.
  • [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat, Sultanate of
  • Oman.
  • Al-Busaidi, S. (1997). An investigation into the causes of students’ listening comprehension
  • problems in English at secondary level in two schools in Sultanate of Oman.
  • [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Exeter University, England.
  • Al-Jahwari M., Al-Mekhlafi A.M., Al-Barwani T., Abdulraheim A. (2019). The effect of metacognitive listening strategy instruction on Omani grade 11 EFL learners’ listening comprehension and their metacognitive listening awareness. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 18, 256–275. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.18.9.14
  • Alkhelaiwi, S. (2023). Are you listening strategically or randomly? examining listening comprehension strategies among Saudi university EFL students. World Journal of English Language, 13(5), 221–230. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v13n5p221
  • Altuwairesh, N. (2021). L2 listening expertise: a deliberate practice approach. International Journal of English Language Education, 9(2), 78. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijele.v9i2.18918
  • Anaktototy, K. (2022). A “Wake-Up Call” for EFL Students: Exploring the Metacognitive Learning Strategy in the Professional Listening Course. REiLA : Journal of Research and Innovation in Language, 4(2), 184-196. https://doi.org/10.31849/reila.v4i2.9476
  • Anderson, N. J. (2002). The role of metacognition in second/foreign language teaching and learning (ED463659). ERIC.
  • Benson, P. (2007). Autonomy in Language Teaching and Learning. Language Teaching, 40, 21-40. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444806003958
  • Benson, P. (2011). Teaching and researching: autonomy in language learning. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315833767
  • Benson, P., & Voller, P. (1997). Autonomy and independence in language learning. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315842172
  • Bermillo, J., & Aradilla, F. J. (2022). Developing students’ listening comprehension and metacognitive awareness through metacognitive process-based listening instruction. Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 4(1), 84–93. https://doi.org/10.32996/jeltal.2022.4.1.8
  • Berne, J. E. (2008). Listening comprehension strategies: a review of the literature. Foreign Language Annals, 37, 521–531. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2004.tb02419.x
  • Bloomfield, A., Wayland, S., Rhoades, E., Blodgett, A., Linck, J., & Ross, S. (2010). What makes listening difficult? Factors affecting listening comprehension [Technical report]. University of Maryland Center for Advanced Study of Language. https://doi.org/10.21236/ADA550176
  • Bozorgian, H. (2014). Less-skilled learners benefit more from metacognitive instruction to develop listening comprehension. International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning, 4(1), 3-12. https://doi.org/10.5861/ijrsll.2014.748
  • Bozorgian, H., & Padiav, B. (2015). The role of metacognitive instruction through pedagogical cycle on metacognitive awareness of EFL learners: Gender difference focus. Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies, 2(2), 99-117.
  • Brunfaut, T., & Revesz, A. (2015). The role of task and listener characteristics in second language listening. TESOL Quarterly, 49(1), 141-168. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.168
  • Cao, Z., & Lin, Y. (2020). A study on metacognitive strategy use in listening comprehension by vocational college students. English Language Teaching, 13(4), 127–139. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v13n4p127
  • Chamot, A. U. (2005). Language learning strategy instruction: Current issues and research. Annual review of Applied Linguistics, 25, 112–30 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190505000061
  • Chase, B.T., &Johannsen, K. L. (2012). Pathways 3: Listening, speaking and critical thinking. Heinle Cengage.
  • Cohen, A. D., & Dörnyei, Z. (2002). Focus on the language learner: Motivation, styles, and strategies. In N. Schmitt (Ed.), An introduction to applied linguistics (pp. 170-190). Arnold.
  • Cohen, A., &Weaver, S. (1998). Strategies-based instruction for second language learners. In W.A. Renandya, & G. M. Jacobs (Eds.), Learners and language learning (pp. 1-25). Sameo Regional Language Centre.
  • Creswell, J. W. (2012). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage.
  • Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, D. J. (2018). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage.
  • Creswell, J.W. & Plano Clark, V.L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage.
  • Daskalovska, N., Hadzi-Nikolova, A., & Alogjozovska, N. (2023). The use of metacognitive listening strategies by English language learners. European Journal of English Language Teaching, 8(1), 4648. https://doi.org/10.46827/ejel.v8i1.4648
  • Diora, L., & Rosa, R. N. (2020). An analysis of students’ difficulties in listening comprehension: a descriptive study at English language and literature department FBS UNP. Journal of English Language Teaching, 9(1), 87–98. https://doi.org/10.24036/jelt.v9i1.107957
  • Dörnyei, Z. (2021). The psychology of second language acquisition. Oxford University Press.
  • Elkhafaifi, H. (2005). Listening comprehension and anxiety in the arabic language classroom. Modern Language Journal, 89(2), 206–220. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2005.00275.x
  • Episiasi, E., Mujiyanto, J., Suwandi, S. & Hartono, R. (2023). Exploring the effects of metacognitive strategy on efl students’ listening performance in Indonesia. The New Educational Review, 72, 176–187. https://doi.org/10.15804/tner.23.72.2.13
  • Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1-4.
  • Fathi, J., & Hamidizadeh, R. (2019). The contribution of listening strategy instruction to improving second language listening comprehension: a case of Iranian EFL Learners. International Journal of Instruction, 12(2), 17-32. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.1222a
  • Field, J. (2008). Listening in the language classroom. Cambridge University Press.
  • Field, J. (2019). Second language listening: current ideas, current issues. In J. W. Schwieter, & A. Benati (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of language learning (pp.283-319). Cambridge University Press.
  • Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906-911. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906
  • Flowerdew, J. & Miller, L. (2005). Second language listening: theory and practice. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667244
  • Goh, C. (1999). How much do learners know about the factors that influence their listening comprehension? Hong Kong Journal of Applied Linguistics, 4, 17–40.
  • Goh, C. (2005). Second language listening expertise. In K. Johnson (Ed.), Expertise in second language learning and teaching (pp. 64–84). Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Goh, C. (2008). Metacognitive instruction for second language listening development: Theory, practice and research implications. RELC Journal, 39(2), 188-213. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688208092184
  • Goh, C. (2017). Cognition, metacognition, and L2 listening. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 214–228). Routledge.
  • Goh, C. C. M. (2000). A cognitive perspective on language learners' listening comprehension problems. System, 28(1), 55-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(99)00058-0
  • Goh, C. C. M. (2002). Learners' Self-Reports on Comprehension and Learning Strategies for Listening. Asian Journal of English Language Teaching, 12, 45-68.
  • Goh, C. C. M., & Hu, G. (2013). Exploring the relationship between metacognitive awareness and listening performance with questionnaire data. Language Awareness, 23(3), 255-274. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2013.769558
  • Goh, C. C., & Vandergrift, L. (2021). Teaching and learning second language listening: metacognition in action. Routledge.
  • Graham, S. & Santos, D. (2015). Strategies for second language listening: Current scenarios and improved pedagogy. Palgrave. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137410528
  • Graham, S. (2011). Self-efficacy and academic listening. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 10, 113-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2011.04.001
  • Graham, S., & Macaro, E. 2008. Strategy instruction in listening for lower-intermediate learners of French. Language Learning, 58, 747–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2008.00478.x
  • Graham, S., Santos, D., & Vanderplank, R. (2008). Listening comprehension and strategy use:A longitudinal exploration. System, 36, 52–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2007.11.001
  • Hasan, A. S. (2000). Learners’ perceptions of listening comprehension problems. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 13, 137–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908310008666595
  • Holec, H. (1981). Autonomy and foreign language learning. Pergamon Press.
  • Huang, H., & Liu, M. (2020). The effect of metacognitive strategy instruction on the listening comprehension of Chinese EFL learners. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(5), 963-976.
  • Irgin, P., & Erten, I. H. (2020). Exploring the role of strategy instruction: Young learners’ listening performance and strategy use. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 6(3), 415-441. https://doi.org/10.32601/ejal.834676
  • Ishikawa, Y., & Takeuchi, O. (2022). Mediation effects of learner autonomy on the relationship between metacognitive strategy use and English listening comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 51(2), 397-410.
  • Jesus, T. (2022). Metacognitive awareness in L2 listening: a transition from doing listening to teaching it. In C. Hampton &S. Salin (Eds.), Innovative language teaching and learning at university: facilitating transition from and to higher education (pp. 103-111). Research-publishing.net https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2022.56.1377
  • Kobayashi, A. (2018). Investigating the effects of metacognitive instruction in listening for EFL Learners. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 15, 310–328. doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2018.15.2.4.310
  • Lee, J., & Lee, J. (2020). Metacognitive strategy use in L2 listening comprehension: The role of learner autonomy. Language Teaching Research, 24(5), 656-675.
  • Li, Q., Zhang, L., & Goh, C. C. M. (2022). Metacognitive Instruction in Second Language Listening: Does Language Proficiency Matter?. English As a Foreign Language International Journal, 2(5), 27–55. https://doi.org/10.56498/3922652022.
  • Li, W. (2013). A Study of metacognitive awareness of non-English majors in L2 listening. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 4(3), 504-510. https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.4.3.504-510.
  • Lynch, T. (2011). Academic listening in the 21st century: Reviewing a decade of research. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 10, 79–88.
  • Maftoon, P., & Fakhri Alamdari, E. (2016). Exploring the effect of metacognitive strategy instruction on metacognitive awareness and listening performance through a process-based approach. International Journal of Listening, International Journal of Listening, 34(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/10904018.2016.1250632
  • Mekhoukh, S. (2022). Metacognitive strategy-based listening instruction. Social Sciences Journal, 16(1), 972-985.
  • Moradian, M., & Kogani Baharvand, P. (2017). Exploring the role of process–based instruction in improving young efl learners' metacognitive awareness and listening comprehension: a sociocultural perspective. Teaching English Language, 11(1), 145-166. https://doi.org/10.22132/tel.2017.53534
  • Naseri, R., Tabatabaei, O., & Sadighi, F. (2019). The effect of metacognitive strategy instruction on listening comprehension and recall of EFL learners. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 13(1), 71-86.
  • Nemtchinova, E. (2013). Teaching Listening. TESOL Publications.
  • O’Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Language learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge University Press.
  • O’Malley, J. M., Chamot, A. U., & Küpper, L. (1989). Listening comprehension strategies in second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 10, 418–437.
  • Oxford, R. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Heinle & Heinle.
  • Oxford, R. L. (2020). Toward a more comprehensive theory of L2 learning strategy instruction: Autonomy-supportive, meaning-focused approaches. Modern Language Journal, 104(1), 239-260.
  • Payaprom, S. (2022). Investigating the Relationship Among Metacognitive Awareness, Self-efficacy, and EFL Learners’ Listening Comprehension Performance. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 13(1), 27-34. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1301.04
  • Purwanto, D., Fadhly, F. Z., & Rahmatunisa, W. (2021). Listening comprehension study: Difficulties and strategies used by college students. Indonesian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 4(1), 55–62. https://doi.org/10.25134/ijli.v4i1.4345
  • Rahimi, M., & Abedi, S. (2014). The relationship between listening self-efficacy and metacognitive awareness of listening strategies. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98(6), 1454-1460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.565
  • Rahimirad, M., & Shams, M. (2014). The effect of activating metacognitive strategies on the listening performance and metacognitive awareness of EFL students. International Journal of Listening, 28(3), 162-176. https://doi.org/10.1080/10904018.2014.902315
  • Rahimirad, M., & Zare-ee, A. (2015). Metacognitive strategy instruction as a means to improve listening self-efficacy among Iranian undergraduate learners of English. International Journal of Instruction, 8(1), 117-132. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2015.819a
  • Richards, J. C. & Burns, A. (2012). Tips for teaching listening: A practical approach. Pearson.
  • Robillos, R. J. (2019). Crossing metacognitive strategy instruction in an EFL classroom: Its impact on Thai learners’ listening comprehension performance and metacognitive awareness. Asian EFL Journal, 21(2), 311-336.
  • Robillos, R. J. (2020). Instruction of metacognitive strategies: Its role on EFL learners’ listening achievement and awareness of their metacognitive listening strategies and self-regulation. Asian EFL Journal, 27(3), 442-452.
  • Robillos, R. J., & Bustos, I. G. (2022). Learners’ listening skill and metacognitive awareness through metacognitive strategy instruction with pedagogical cycle. International Journal of Instruction, 15(3), 393-412. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15322a
  • Rost, M. (2011). Teaching and researching listening. Longman.
  • Saraswaty, D. R. (2018). Learners’ difficulties & strategies in listening comprehension. English Community Journal, 2(1), 139–152. https://doi.org/10.32502/ecj.v2i1.1003.
  • Sari, N., & Fithriyana, R. (2019). Exploring EFL students’ problems in listening comprehension. Journal of English Educators Society, 4(1), 47–52. https://doi.org/10.21070/jees.v4i1.1722
  • Siegel, J. (2013). Exploring L2 listening instruction: Examinations of practice. ELT Journal, 68(1), 22-30. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/cct058
  • Siegel, J. (2015). Exploring listening strategy instruction through action research. Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Taguchi, K. (2017). A Follow-up study on listening strategy use and self-efficacy in relation to listening proficiency in EFL. The Economic Review of Toyo University, 42(2), 155-166.
  • Vandergrift, L, (2005). Relationships among motivation orientations, metacognitive awareness and proficiency in L2 listening. Applied Linguistics, 26(1), 70–89. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amh039
  • Vandergrift, L. (1997). The comprehension strategies of second language (French) listeners: A descriptive study. Foreign Language Annals, 30(3), 387–409. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.1997.tb02362.x
  • Vandergrift, L. (1999). Facilitating second language listening comprehension: Acquiring successful strategies. ELT Journal, 53(3), 168-176.
  • Vandergrift, L. (2003). Orchestrating strategy use: toward a model of the skilled second language listener. Language learning, 53(3), 463-496. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00232
  • Vandergrift, L. (2004). Listening to learn or learning to listen? Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 3-25. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190504000017
  • Vandergrift, L. (2007). Recent developments in second and foreign language listening comprehension research. Language Teaching, 40(3), 191-210. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444807004338
  • Vandergrift, L., & Goh, C. C. M. (2012). Teaching and learning second language listening: Metacognition in action. Routledge.
  • Vandergrift, L., & Tafaghodtari, M. H. (2010). Teaching L2 learners how to listen does make a difference: An empirical study. Language learning, 60(2), 470-479. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00559.x
  • Vandergrift, L., Goh, C., Mareschal, C.J., & Tafaghodatari, M. H. (2006). The metacognitive awareness listening questionnaire (MALQ): Development and validation. Language Learning, 56, 431-462. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2006.00373.x
  • Vellanki, S. S., Mond, S., Khan, Z. K., & Nair, L. G. (2022). Teachers’ viewpoint of metacognitive strategy instruction in listening during remote teaching in oman: challenges and strategies. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 21(7), 82-106. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.7.5
  • Wenden, A. L. (2001). Meta-cognitive knowledge in SLA: The neglected variable. In M. P. Breen (Ed.), Learner contributions to language learning: New directions in research (pp. 44-46). Pearson.
  • Xu, J., Fan, J., & Luo, K. (2021). Exploring L2 listening instruction, self-efficacy, and strategy use: a mediation analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 758757. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.758757
  • Xu, J., & Huang, Y. T. (2018). The mediating effect of listening metacognitive awareness between listening test anxiety and listening test performance. The Asia- Pacific Education Researcher, 27(4), 313–324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-018-0388-z
  • Yeldham, M., & Gruba, P. (2016). The development of individual learners in an L2 listening strategies course. Language Teaching Research, 20(1), 9-34. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168814541723
  • Yuan, Z., & Chunrong, W. (2023). An investigation on the use of Metacognitive strategies in English listening learning among junior high school students. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 10(2), 12-19. https://doi.org/10.14445/23942703/ijhss-v10i2p102
  • Zeng, Y., & Goh, C. C. (2018). A self-regulated learning approach to extensive listening and its impact on listening achievement and metacognitive awareness. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 8(2), 193–218. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2018.8.2.2
  • Zhai, J. & Aryadoust, V. (2022). The metacognitive and neurocognitive signatures of test methods in academic listening. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 930075. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.930075
  • Zhang, L., Yu, X., & Goh, C. C. (2022). Improving performance and metacognitive awareness in listening through metacognitive instruction for Chinese language learners. RELC Journal. Advanced Online Publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882221129645

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.