Abstract

The current longitudinal qualitative research explored the development of pre-service English teachers’ perspectives on critical literacy and critical pedagogy throughout the Critical Reading and Writing course. The data were collected through a text selection questionnaire, pre-course and post-course critical consciousness questionnaires, and semi-structured interviews. At the beginning, a text selection questionnaire was administered to identify social issues relevant to the target teacher candidates’ lives. Based on the results obtained from the text selection questionnaire, the texts which are about women, virtual education, censorship and future anxiety were chosen to be used in the course. The critical consciousness questionnaires assessed shifts in understanding and attitudes toward critical literacy and pedagogy over the course and semi-structured interviews provided in-depth insights into the pre-service English teachers’ perspectives and experiences. The data were analyzed using content analysis to interpret the qualitative findings. The findings indicate a notable change in the students’ perspectives toward integrating social issues into English teaching. They developed more positive attitudes toward a more critical language education approach including social issues and empowering learners to be the agents of change. The participants also demonstrated improved understanding of critical pedagogy, and recognition of the transformative role of English teachers. According to the results, it is likely that these pre-service teachers will be able to integrate critical literacy activities and social awareness into their future teaching practices.

Keywords

References

• Akbari, R. (2008). Transforming lives: Introducing critical pedagogy into ELT classrooms. ELT journal, 62(3), 276-283. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccn025
• Anderson, G. L., & Irvine, P. (1993). Informing critical literacy with ethnography. In C. Lankshear & P. L. McLaren (Eds.), Critical literacy: Politics, praxis, and the postmodern (pp. 81-104). State University of New York Press.
• Balbay, S. (2019). Enhancing critical awareness through Socratic pedagogy. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5(3), 515-536. https://doi.org/10.32601/ejal.651348
• Balıkçı, G., & Daloğlu, A. (2016). Critical reading discourse of pre-service English teachers in Turkey. Tesl-Ej, 20(1), 1-19.
• Baynham, M. (2006). Agency and contingency in the language learning of refugees and asylum seekers. Linguistics and Education, 17(1), 24-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2006.08.008
• Bilgin, N. (2014). Sosyal bilimlerde içerik analizi: Teknikler ve örnek çalışmalar [Content analysis in social sciences: techniques and case studies]. Siyasal.
• Bilki, Z., & Irgin, P. (2022). Towards becoming critical readers and writers: ELT students' perceptions on the effectiveness of critical reading and writing instruction. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching, 9(2), 987-1003.
• Bilki, Z. (2023). Developing a reading course model for pre-service English language teachers within the framework of critical pedagogy. RumeliDE Journal of Language and Literature Studies, 32, 1387-1401. https://doi.org/10.29000/rumelide.1253151
• Boozer, M. E., Maras, L В., & Brummett, В. (1999). xchanging ideas and changing positions: The importance of conversation to holistic, critical endeavors. In С. Edelsky (Ed.), Making justice our project: Teachers working toward critical whole language practice (pp. 55-76). National Council of Teachers of English.
• Bryman, A. (2012). Social research methods. Oxford University Press.
• Cervetti, G., Pardales, M. J., & Damico, J. S. (2001). A tale of differences: Comparing the traditions, perspectives, and educational goals of critical reading and critical literacy. Reading online, 4(9), 80-90.
• Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. Routledge.
• Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage.
• Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method approaches. Sage.
• Crookes, G., & Lehner, A. (1998). Aspects of process in an ESL critical pedagogy teacher education course. Tesol Quarterly, 32(2), 319-328. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587586
• Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11
• Freire, P. (2000). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Continuum.
• Gieve, S. (1998). Comments on Dwight Atkinson's "A critical approach to critical thinking in TESOL": A case for critical thinking in the English language classroom. A reader reacts. Tesol Quarterly, 32(1), 123-129. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587907
• Hedgcock, J. S., & Ferris, D. R. (2018). Teaching readers of English: Students, texts, and contexts. Routledge.
• Helin J. (2021). Transformative competencies - how to define and implement competencies for SDG target 4.7. European Union.
• Huh, S. (2016). Instructional model of critical literacy in an EFL context: Balancing conventional and critical literacy. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 13(3), 210-235. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427587.2016.1154445
• Janks, H. (2009). Literacy and power. Routledge.
• Janks, H. (2013). Critical literacy in teaching and research. Education Inquiry, 4(2), 225–242. https://doi.org/10.3402/edui.v4i2.22071
• Janks, H. (2014). Critical literacy’s ongoing importance for education. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 57(5), 349– 356. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.260
• Jeyaraj, J. J., & Harland, T. (2014). Transforming teaching and learning in ELT through critical pedagogy: An international study. Journal of Transformative Education, 12(4), 343-355. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541344614550042
• Jeyaraj, J. J., & Harland, T. (2016). Teaching with critical pedagogy in ELT: the problems of indoctrination and risk. Pedagogy, Culture and Society 24(4), 587–598. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2016.1196722
• Kızılay, Y. (2014). Developing critical reading for pre-service English teachers’ actual reflections (Publication no. 377642) [Master’s thesis, Sakarya University]. Council of Higher Education Thesis Center.
• Kumaravadivelu, B. (2006). TESOL methods: changing tracks, challenging trends. TESOL Quarterly, 40(1), 59-81. https://doi.org/10.2307/40264511
• Leland, C. H., Harste, J., & Huber, K. R. (2005). Out of the box: Critical literacy in a first-grade classroom. Language Arts, 82(4), 257-268. https://doi.org/10.58680/la20054400
• Lewison, M., Leland, C., & Harste, J. (2000). 'Not in my classroom!' the case for using multi-view social issues books with children. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 23(1), 8-20.
• Lewison, M., Flint, A. S., & Van Sluys, K. (2002). Taking on critical literacy: The journey of newcomers and novices. Language arts, 79(5), 382-392. https://doi.org/10.58680/la2002255
• Lewison, M., Leland, C., & Harste, J. C. (2015). Creating critical classrooms: Reading and writing with an edge. Routledge.
• Lincoln, Y. & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry: Establishing Trustworthiness. Sage.
• Luke, A. (2004). Two takes on the critical. In B. Norton & K. Toohey (Eds.), Critical pedagogies and language learning (pp. 21–31). Cambridge University Press.
• Luke, A. (2012). Critical literacy: Foundational notes. Theory into Practice, 51(1), 4-11. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2012.636324
• Mayo, P. (2004). Liberating praxis: Paulo Freire’s legacy for radical education and politics. Sense Publishers.
• McLaren, P. (2015). Life in schools: An introduction to critical pedagogy in the foundations of education. Routledge.
• Miles, M, B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded Sourcebook. Sage.
• Muijs, D. (2012). Surveys and sampling. In A. R. J Briggs, M. Coleman, & M. Morrison (Eds.), Research methods in educational leadership & management (pp. 140–154). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473957695.n10
• Nam, J. (2020). Disrupting the commonplace: Critical literacy practices in the ESL reading classroom. The International Journal of Critical Pedagogy, 11(1), 131-153
• OECD. (2019). Future of education and skills 2030. Author. https://www.oecd.org/
• Ördem, E., & Yükselir, C. (2017). Views of Turkish EFL instructors on critical pedagogy. Electronic Turkish Studies, 12(14), 285-294. http://dx.doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.11622
• Ördem, E., & Ulum, Ö. G. (2019). Critical pedagogy and participatory approach in Turkey: views of pre-service ELT teachers. Electronic Turkish Studies, 14(2), 679-693. http://dx.doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.14655
• Pennycook, A. (1990). Critical pedagogy and second language education. System, 18(3), 303–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/0346-251X(90)90003-N
• Pennycook, A. (1999). Introduction: Critical approaches to TESOL. TESOL Quarterly, 33(3), 329-348. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587668
• Pennycook, A. (2001). Critical applied linguistics: A critical introduction. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Santana-Williamson, E. (2000). Critical Pedagogy in TESOL: A Review of the Literature (ED447700). Eric.
• Shor, I. (1992). Empowering education: Critical teaching for social change. University of Chicago Press.
• Shor, I. (1999). What is critical literacy? Journal of Pedagogy, Pluralism, and Practice, 1(4), 1-32.
• Siegel, M., & Fernandez, S. L. (2000). Critical approaches. In M.L. Kamil, R. Barr, P.D. Pearson, & P. Mosenthal (Eds.), Handbook of reading research: Volume III (pp. 141-151). Routledge.
• Soares, L. B., & Wood, K. (2010). A critical literacy perspective for teaching and learning social studies. The Reading Teacher, 63(6), 486-494. https://doi.org/10.1598/RT.63.6.5
• Şenbayrak, M., & Ortaçtepe Hart, D. (2024). Exploring social justice dialogues in EFL conversation clubs: discursive moves and affordances. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 37(3), 327-342. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2024.2339316
• Unsworth, L. (2001). Teaching multiliteracies across the curriculum. Open University Press.
• United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. Author. https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda
• Van Sluys, K. (2005). What if and why? Literacy invitations for multilingual classrooms. Heinemann.
• Vasquez, V. M. (2010). iPods, puppy dogs, and podcasts: Imagining literacy instruction for the 21st century. School Talk, 15(2), 1– 2.
• Vasquez, V. M. (2014a). Inquiry into the incidental unfolding of social justice issues: 20 years of seeking out possibilities for critical literacies. In J. Z. Pandya & J. Ávila (Eds.), Moving critical literacies forward: A new look at praxis across contexts (pp. 174– 186). Routledge.
• Vasquez, V. M. (2014b). Negotiating critical literacies with young children: 10th anniversary edition. Routledge.
• Vasquez, V. M., Janks, H., & Comber, B. (2019). Critical literacy as a way of being and doing. Language Arts, 96(5), 300-311. https://doi.org/10.58680/la201930093
• Wallace, C. (1992) Criticial literacy in the EFL classroom. In N. Fairclough (Ed.), Critical Language Awareness (pp. 59-92). Longman.
• Wallace, C. (2003). Critical reading in language education. Springer.
• Wells, M. S., Morrison, J. D., & López‐Robertson, J. (2022). Building critical reading and critical literacy with picturebook analysis. The Reading Teacher, 76(2), 191-200. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.2130
• Yin, R. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods. Sage.

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.