Attitude scale towards LGBTI individuals: Validity and reliability study
Kübra Çiçek 1, Ayşe Turanlı 1, Ahmet Sapancı 1 *
More Detail
1 Duzce University, Faculty of Education, Guidance and Psychological Counseling
* Corresponding Author

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to develop an instrument to measure university students’ attitudes towards LGBTI individuals. The sample included 220 university students attended a public university located in the west of Turkey during 2016-2017 education year. The participants were 94 men and 126 women and their age ranged from 18 to 25. During the scale development process, a few steps have been followed. At first, items that had negative correlations with the scale have been removed from the analysis. Then exploratory factor analysis (EFA) has been performed. The results of EFA revealed 28 items loading three factors. These three factors explained 43.9% of the variance. For the reliability of the scale, the Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient of the scale and its sub-dimensions have been found to be .95, .94, .81, and .70 respectively. The results of this study showed that the attitude scale towards LGBTI individuals is a valid and reliable scale.

Keywords

References

  • Alper, U. (2014). Homofobi Nedir? [What is homophobia?] Retrieved on May 19, 2017 from lgbtiHYPERLINK "file:///C:/Users/levan/Desktop/Ayşe-Kübra".org/homofobi-nedir/
  • Burger, J. M. (2006). Kişilik [Personality]. İstanbul: Kaknüs Psikoloji.
  • Dogan, S., Dogan, M., Bestepe, E., & Eker, E. (2008). Development and reliability study of Homosexuality Attitudes Scale: A preliminary study. Anatolian Journal of Psychiatry, 9, 84-90.
  • Duyan, V. & Gelbal, S. (2004). Lezbiyen ve geylere yönelik tutum (LGYT) ölçeği: Güvenirlik ve geçerlik çalışması [Attitude scale towards lesbians and gays (ASTLG): Reliability and validity study]. Turkish Journal of HIV\AIDS, 7(3), 106-112.
  • Kaos GL Association. (2011). Ne Hastalık, Ne Suç, Ne Günah. LGBT Hakları İnsan Haklarıdır [It is not either a disease, crime, or sin. LGBT rights are human rights]. Ankara. Kaos GL Yayınevi.
  • Mohr, J. J., & Kendra, M. S. (2011). Revision and extension of a multidimensional measure of sexual minority identity: The Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Identity Scale. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 58, 234-245.
  • Öztürk, P. & Kındap, Y. (2011). Turkish adaptation of the lesbian internalized Homophobia scale: A study of validity and reliability. Turkish Psychological Articles, 14 (28), 24-38.
  • Pallant, J. (2016). SPSS Survival Manual: A Step by Step Guide to Data Analysis Using SPSS Program (6th ed.). London, UK: McGraw-Hill Education,.
  • Saraç, L. & Rahim, Z. E. (2009). Homophobia in sports: Comparison of male and female university students’ attitudes toward homosexual athletes. Hacettepe Journal of Sport Sciences, 20 (3), 104-116.
  • Szymanski, D. M. & Chung, Y. B. (2001). The lesbian internalized homophobia scale: A rational/theoretical approach. Journal of Homosexuality, 41(2), 37-52.
  • Şah, U. (2012). The relationship of the descriptions of homosexuality, bisexuality and transsexuality with levels of homophobia and acquaintanceship with LGBT people. Studies in Psychology, 32(2), 23-49.

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.