Abstract

This study investigates the adoption and usage of artificial intelligence [AI] technologies among Chinese undergraduate accounting students, focusing on the roles of Social Influence [SI], Behavioral Intention [BI], and Actual Usage [AU], while examining the mediating effect of BI and the moderating effect of Voluntariness of Use [VOU]. By extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology [UTAUT] model, it addresses gaps in understanding the social and behavioral factors influencing AI adoption within the educational context. A quantitative research design was employed, utilizing Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling. Data was collected through a self-administered survey distributed via the Wenjuanxing platform, with responses from 362 Chinese undergraduate accounting students analyzed to test the hypothesized relationships. The findings reveal that SI significantly affects both BI and AU, with BI serving as a partial mediator in the SI-AU relationship. However, VOU did not exhibit a significant moderating effect on the SI-BI pathway. These results provide insights into the dual role of SI and the importance of fostering positive attitudes toward AI adoption among students. This study contributes to the literature by extending the UTAUT model in an educational setting, emphasizing the interplay of cultural and social dynamics in influencing AI adoption. It offers actionable recommendations for educators, policymakers, and technology vendors to promote AI integration in accounting education and prepare students for AI-driven professional environments.  

Keywords

References

• Agarwal, R., & Prasad, J. (1997). The role of innovation characteristics and perceived voluntariness in the acceptance of information technologies. Decision Sciences, 28(3), 557–582. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1997.tb01322.x
• Ajjan, H., & Hartshorne, R. (2008). Investigating faculty decisions to adopt Web 2.0 technologies: Theory and empirical tests. Internet and Higher Education, 11(2), 71–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.05.002
• Alhasnawi, M. Y., Said, R. M., Alshdaifat, S. M., Elorabi, K. A., Al-Hasnawi, M. H., & Khudhair, A. H. (2024). How does budget participation affect managerial performance in the higher education sector? A mediated-moderated model. Asian Journal of Accounting Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJAR-12-2023-0405
• Almahri, F. A. J., Bell, D., & Merhi, M. (2020). Understanding student acceptance and use of chatbots in the United Kingdom universities: A structural equation modelling approach. In S. Li (Ed.), 2020 6th International Conference on Information Management (ICIM), (pp. 284–288). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIM49319.2020.244712
• Alshdaifat, S. M., Aziz, N. H. A., Alhasnawi, M. Y., Alharasis, E. E., Al Qadi, F., & Al Amosh, H. (2024). The role of digital technologies in corporate sustainability: a bibliometric review and future research agenda. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 17(11), 509. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm17110509
• Andrews, J. E., Ward, H., & Yoon, J. (2021). UTAUT as a model for understanding intention to adopt AI and related technologies among librarians. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 47(6), 102437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2021.102437
• Bentler, P. M., & Yuan, K. H. (1999). Structural equation modeling with small samples: Test statistics. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 34(2), 181–197. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327906Mb340203
• Celik, I., Sahin, I., & Aydin, M. (2014). Reliability and validity study of the mobile learning adoption scale developed based on the diffusion of innovations theory. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 2(4), 300–316. https://doi.org/10.18404/ijemst.65217
• Chao, C. M. (2019). Factors determining the behavioral intention to use mobile learning: An application and extension of the UTAUT model. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1652. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01652
• Chatterjee, S., & Bhattacharjee, K. K. (2020). Adoption of artificial intelligence in higher education: A quantitative analysis using structural equation modelling. Education and Information Technologies, 25(5), 3443–3463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10159-7
• Chatterjee, S., Rana, N. P., Khorana, S., Mikalef, P., & Sharma, A. (2023). Assessing organizational users’ intentions and behavior to AI-integrated CRM systems: A meta-UTAUT approach. Information Systems Frontiers, 25(4), 1299–1313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-021-10181-1
• Cortese, A. (2023, December 28). How realistic are Chinese university AI ambitions? MacroPolo. https://macropolo.org/chinese-university-ai-ambitions/?rp=e
• Cortez, P. M., Ong, A. K. S., Diaz, J. F. T., German, J. D., & Jagdeep, S. J. S. S. (2024). Analyzing Preceding factors affecting behavioral intention on communicational artificial intelligence as an educational tool. Heliyon, 10(3), 25896. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25896
• Cruchinho, P., López-Franco, M. D., Capelas, M. L., Almeida, S., Bennett, P. M., Miranda da Silva, M., Teixeira, G., Nunes, E., Lucas, P. & Gaspar, F. (2024). Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and validation of measurement instruments: a practical guideline for novice researchers. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, 17, 2701-2728. https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S419714
• Cunha, T., Martins, H., Carvalho, A., & Carmo, C. (2022). Not practicing what you preach: how is accounting higher education preparing the future of accounting. Education Sciences, 12(7), 432. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12070432
• Damerji, H., & Salimi, A. (2021). Mediating effect of use perceptions on technology readiness and adoption of artificial intelligence in accounting. Accounting Education, 30(2), 107–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2021.1872035
• Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
• Dwianto, A., Rahman, A. N., Ulynnuha, O. I., Anam, K., & Saif, G. M. S. (2024). The impact of technology readiness, usefulness, and ease of use on AI-based accounting software adoption. Advances in Accounting Innovation, 1(1), 10-11. https://doi.org/10.69725/aai.v1i1.87
• Dwivedi, Y. K., Rana, N. P., Jeyaraj, A., Clement, M., & Williams, M. D. (2019). Re-examining the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT): Towards a revised theoretical model. Information Systems Frontiers, 21, 719–734. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-017-9774-y
• Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley.
• Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 382–388. https://doi.org/10.2307/3150980
• Hair, J. F., Bush, R. P., & Ortinau, D. J. (2009). Marketing research: In a digital information environment. McGraw-Hill Irwin.
• Hair Jr, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage Publications.
• Hair Jr, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & Kuppelwieser, V. G. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research. European Business Review, 26(2), 106–121. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-10-2013-0128
• Hartshorne, R., & Ajjan, H. (2009). Examining student decisions to adopt Web 2.0 technologies: Theory and empirical tests. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 21(3), 183–198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-009-9023-6
• Hubona, G. S., & Kennick, E. (1996, January). The influence of external variables on information technology usage behavior. In J. F. Nunamaker & R. H. Sprague (Eds.), Proceedings of HICSS-29: 29th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (Vol. 4, pp. 166–175). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.1996.495323
• Kavitha, K., & Joshith, V. P. (2024). Pedagogical ıncorporation of artificial ıntelligence in K-12 science education: A decadal bibliometric mapping and systematic literature review (2013-2023). Journal of Pedagogical Research, 8(4), 437-465. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.202429218
• Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford Press.
• Kotb, A., Abdel-Kader, M., Allam, A., Halabi, H., & Franklin, E. (2019). Information technology in the British and Irish undergraduate accounting degrees. Accounting Education, 28(5), 445–464. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2019.1588135
• Li, K. (2023). Determinants of college students’ actual use of AI-based systems: An extension of the technology acceptance model. Sustainability, 15(6), 5221. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15065221
• Moon, J. W., & Kim, Y. G. (2001). Extending the TAM for a World-Wide-Web context. Information & Management, 38(4), 217–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(00)00061-6
• Moore, G. C., & Benbasat, I. (1991). Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Information Systems Research, 2(3), 192–222. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2.3.192
• Moriuchi, E. (2021). An empirical study on anthropomorphism and engagement with disembodied AIs and consumers’ re-use behavior. Psychology & Marketing, 38(1), 21–42. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21407
• Nassar, A. A. M., & Othman, K. (2019). The impact of the social influence on ICT adoption: Behavioral intention as mediator and age as moderator. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 9(11), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v9-i11/6620
• Nunnally, J. C. (1994). Psychometric theory. Tata McGraw-Hill Education.
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
• Popenici, S. A., & Kerr, S. (2017). Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence on teaching and learning in higher education. Research and practice in technology enhanced learning, 12(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-017-0062-8
• Rahi, S., Othman Mansour, M. M., Alghizzawi, M., & Alnaser, F. M. (2019). Integration of UTAUT model in internet banking adoption context: The mediating role of performance expectancy and effort expectancy. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 13(3), 411–435. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIM-02-2018-0032
• Ramllah, & Nurkhin, A. (2020). Analysis of factors affecting behavioral intention to use e-learning using the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology approach. KnE Social Sciences, 4(6), 1005–1025. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v4i6.6658
• Rocha, D. P., Bewersdorff, A., & Nerdel, C. (2024). Exploring Influences on ICT Adoption in German Schools: A UTAUT-Based Structural Equation Model. Journal of Learning for Development, 11(2), 311-322. https://doi.org/10.56059/jl4d.v11i2.1116
• Saleem, I., Abdeljawad, I., & Nour, A. I. (2023). Artificial intelligence and the future of accounting profession: Implications and challenges. In A. Hannoon & A. Mahmood (Eds.), Artificial Intelligence, Internet of Things, and Society 5.0 (pp. 327–336). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-43300-9_27
• Sarstedt, M., & Cheah, J.-H. (2019). Partial least squares structural equation modeling using SmartPLS: A software review. Journal of Marketing Analytics, 7(3), 196–202. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41270-019-00058-3
• Sevnarayan, K. (2024). Exploring the dynamics of ChatGPT: Students and lecturers’ perspectives at an open distance e-learning university. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 8(2), 212-226. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.202426525
• Shorfuzzaman, M., & Alhussein, M. (2016). Modeling learners’ readiness to adopt mobile learning: A perspective from a GCC higher education institution. Mobile Information Systems, 2016(1), 6982824. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/6982824
• Shu, W., Cao, J., Wang, H., & Zhao, S. (2021). Current situation, challenges, and countermeasures of accounting undergraduate talent cultivation in China. Accounting Research, 8, 177–189.
• Tian, W., Ge, J., Zhao, Y., & Zheng, X. (2024). AI Chatbots in Chinese higher education: adoption, perception, and influence among graduate students—an integrated analysis utilizing UTAUT and ECM models. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1268549. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1268549
• Vărzaru, A. A. (2022). Assessing artificial intelligence technology acceptance in managerial accounting. Electronics, 11(14), 2256. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11142256
• Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences, 39(2), 273–315. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x
• Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
• Vincent-Lancrin, S., & Van der Vlies, R. (2020). Trustworthy artificial intelligence (AI) in education: Promises and challenges. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/a6c90fa9-en
• Wang, Y. S., Wu, M. C., & Wang, H. Y. (2009). Investigating the determinants and age and gender differences in the acceptance of mobile learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(1), 92–118. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00809.x
• Weilan, Z. (2024, June 25). Chinese universities ramp up efforts to foster AI talent amid global AI race. Global Times. https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202406/1314800.shtml
• Xue, L., Rashid, A. M., & Ouyang, S. (2024). The unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) in higher education: A systematic review. Sage Open, 14(1), 229570. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241229570

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.