Abstract

Peer mentoring schemes are increasingly visible within professional practice, and in recent years, universities have integrated mentoring across undergraduate programmes. In order to provide the appropriate support to peer mentors and contribute to the future development and success of peer-mentoring schemes, it is necessary to investigate not only the benefits afforded to mentees, but also peer mentors' perceptions of their experiences. This small-scale qualitative study was conducted with participants who were recruited from the peer-mentoring scheme across two professional undergraduate health programmes: Podiatry and Sports Therapy.  Semi-structured interviews were used to explore the early experiences and expectations of being a mentor, mentorship activities, reasons and personal narratives for becoming a mentor, and the effectiveness of the training they received. Findings suggest that constructive and destructive friction exist between how mentors perceive their mentorship role and the strategies and skills they develop and use during their mentorship experiences.The study concludes with recommendations for new mentors and implementation of mentorship schemes within the widening population context of higher education.

Keywords

References

• Archer, L. (2007). Diversity, equality and higher education: a critical reflection on the abuses of equity discourse within widening participation. Teaching in Higher Education, 12(5), 635-653.
• Bayer, A., Grossman, J. B., Dubois, D. L. (2015). Using volunteer mentors to improve the academic outcomes of underserved students: The role of relationships. Journal of Community Psychology, 43(4), 408-429.
• Beattie, M. (2000). Narratives of professional learning: Becoming a teacher and learning to teach. Journal of Educational Enquiry, 1(2), 1-23.
• Brabon, B. (2017). Students at the heart of the system. Horizon scanning report; Contemporary Issues in Teaching and Learning. Higher Education Academy, UK.
• Cantwell, R. H., &Scevak, J. J. (2004). Engaging university learning: The experiences of students entering university via recognition of prior industrial experience. Higher Education Research and Development, 23(2), 131-145.
• Charmaz, K. (2003). Grounded Theory. In J.A. Smith (ed.), Qualitative Psychology: A Practical Guide to Research Methods (pp. 81-110). London: Sage.
• Chow, K., & Healey, M. (2008). Place attachment and place identity: First-year undergraduates making the transition from home to university. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28(4), 362-372.
• Christie, H., Munro, M., & Fisher, T. (2004). Leaving university early: Exploring the difference between continuing and non-continuing students. Studies in Higher Education, 29(5), 617-636.
• Christie, H, Cree, V. E., Mullins, E. &Tett, L. (2018). ‘University opened up so many doors for me’: the personal and professional development of graduates form non-traditional backgrounds. Research in Higher Education, 43(11), 1938-1948.
• Crisp, G., & Cruz, I. (2009). Mentoring college students: A critical review of the literature between 1990 and 2007. Research in Higher Education, 50(6), 525-545.
• Dancer, J.M. (2003). Mentoring in healthcare: theory in search of practice? Clinician in Management, 12(1), 21-31.
• Drew, N. M., Pike, L. T., Pooley, J. A., Young, A. H. C., & Breen, L. (2000). School of psychology peer mentoring pilot program. Paper presented at the 4th PacificRim - First year in higher education Conference: Creating Futures for a New Millennium. QUT, Brisbane, Australia.
• Eby, L. T., Durley, J. R., Evans, S. C., &Ragins, B. R. (2006). The relationship between short-term mentoring benefits and long-term mentor outcomes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 69(3), 424-444.
• Falchikov, N. (2001). Learning Together: Peer Tutoring in Higher Education. London: Routledge.
• Fox, A., & Stevenson, L. (2006). Exploring the effectiveness of peer mentoring of accounting and finance students in higher education. Accounting Education: An International Journal, 15(2), 189-202.
• Gibbs, G. R. (2007). Thematic coding and categorizing. Analyzing Qualitative Data. London: Sage.
• Gilles, C., & Wilson, J. (2004). Receiving as well as giving: Mentors' perceptions of their professional development in one teacher induction program. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 12(1), 88-106.
• Glaser, N., Hall, R., & Halperin, S. (2006). Students supporting students: The effects of peer mentoring on the experiences of first year university students. Journal of the Australia and New Zealand Student Services Association, 27, 4-19.
• Hamshire, C., Willgoss, T.G., &Wibberley, C. (2013). Should I stay or should I go? A study exploring why healthcare students consider leaving their programme. Nurse Education Today, 33(8), 889-895.
• HEFCE (2017). 299 universities and colleges take part in year two of the Teaching Excellence Framework. Report on the 27 January. Retrieved from http:/www.hefce.ac.uk/
• Heirdsfield, A. M., Walker, S., Walsh, K, & Wilss, L. (2008). Peer mentoring for first year teacher education students: the mentors' experience. Mentoring & Tutoring; Partnership in Learning, 16(2), 109-124.
• Jackling, B., & McDowall, T. (2008). Peer Mentoring in an Accounting Setting: A case study of mentor skill development. Accounting Education: An International Journal, 17(4), 447-462.
• Kane, S., Chalcraft, D., & Volpe, G. (2014). Notions of belonging: First year, first semester higher education student enrolled on business or economics degree programmes. International Journal of Management Education, 12(2), 193-201.
• Keller, T. E. (2005). A systemic model of the youth mentoring intervention. Journal of Primary Prevention, 26(2), 169–188
• King, N. (2004). Using templates in the thematic analysis of text. In C.Cassell, & G. Symon (Eds.), Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research (pp. 256-270). London: Sage.
• Le Cornu, R. (2005). Peer mentoring: Engaging pre-service teachers in mentoring one another. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnerships in Learning, 13(3), 335-366.
• Macleod, A.K., & Conway, C. (2007). Well-being and positive future thinking for self versus others. Cognition and Emotion. 21(5):1114-1124.
• McInnis, C., James, R., & Hartley, R. (2000). Trends in the first year experience in Australian universities. Canberra: Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs.
• Pitkethly, A., & Prosser, M. (2001). The first year experience project: a model for university wide change. Higher Education Research and Development, 20(2), 185-198.
• Potter, J. (1997). New directions in student tutoring. Education and Training, 39(1), 24-30.
• Rolfe-Flett, A. (2000). Mentoring in Australia. Frenchs Forest. Pearson: Australia.
• Sambell, K., McDowell, L, & Montgomery, C. (2013). Assessment for learning in higher education. London: Routledge.
• Sambunjak, D., Straus, S.E, & Marusic, A. (2010). A systematic review of qualitative research on the meaning and characteristics of mentoring in academic medicine. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 25(1), 72-78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-009-1165-8
• Scanlon, L., Rowling, L., & Weber, Z. (2007). 'You don't have like an identity... you are just lost in a crowd': Forming a student identity in the first-year transition to university. Journal of Youth Studies, 10(2), 223-241.
• Ten Cate, O., Snell, L., Mann, K., &Vermunt, J. (2004). Orienting teaching towards the learning process. Academic Medicine, 79(3), 219-228.
• University of East London (2018). Annual report and financial statements. Retrieved from https://www.uel.ac.uk/-/media/main/finance/121218_annual-report-2018
• Vermunt, J.D., &Verloop, N. (1999). Congruence and friction between learning and teaching. Learning Instruction, 9, 257-280.
• Vygotsky, L. (1979). Mind in Society: The development of higher psychological processes. M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, (Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.